Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: cbusters]
#2342279
07/24/17 02:56 AM
07/24/17 02:56 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
Oil fill and pcv/breather.
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: cbusters]
#2342461
07/24/17 03:19 PM
07/24/17 03:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922
S.E. Michigan
|
Breather and pcv.
(Oil fill is the big cap, already covered.)
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: ZIPPY]
#2342502
07/24/17 04:18 PM
07/24/17 04:18 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784 Florida
cbusters
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
|
Breather and pcv.
(Oil fill is the big cap, already covered.) So the PCV valve screws into the threaded opening under the filler cap? Is that a standard 5.7 item that will transfer over to the MP intake? Or something I will have to hunt down or make?
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: cbusters]
#2342613
07/24/17 07:09 PM
07/24/17 07:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922
S.E. Michigan
|
Can't recall if the pcv valve goes in the side or in the front by the cap. It's only been 12 years...
I am pretty sure it is not a 5.7 pcv valve, it is from some other application, 5.7 does not use a hose, crate engine did.
I might still have the crate engine I sheet on cd someplace. Would take awhile to find it, though. (everything is boxed up).
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: cbusters]
#2342627
07/24/17 07:37 PM
07/24/17 07:37 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
look at an 05 Magnum with the 5.7 for the PCV valve
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: cbusters]
#2342932
07/25/17 08:27 AM
07/25/17 08:27 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,400 Trumbauersville PA
ric3xrt
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,400
Trumbauersville PA
|
Google MOPAR 53032531AE For the PCV
Truth has no agenda, but those with an agenda make their own truth. Some of us are so open minded they only see their View
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: cbusters]
#2343006
07/25/17 12:31 PM
07/25/17 12:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922
S.E. Michigan
|
The stock 5.7 pcvs are a quarter turn thing with no hose attached. They won't work with this intake.
The old crate intake intake uses a pcv from some other application that screws in the front near the oil cap, and a hose runs to it from there. The valve looks like one from a 2.0 or 2.4.
Run a breather hose to a breather tank, or a small k&N type breather or whatever you've got, off the fitting in the side of the intake.
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: moparcyco]
#2343180
07/25/17 05:47 PM
07/25/17 05:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922
S.E. Michigan
|
I have the efi version been searching the same issues. pcv that will thread into small port below oil fill is napa number 2-9627 fits 2.4. Sometimes it's great to be reminded your memory isn't as shot as you thought it was (thanks) I knew it looked like a 2.0 or 2.4 pcv but couldn't remember what it was actually from.
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: ZIPPY]
#2343250
07/25/17 08:36 PM
07/25/17 08:36 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784 Florida
cbusters
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
|
Run a breather off the port labeled "intake breather port" in the picture above. Is that nipple what is missing in this picture?
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: cbusters]
#2343500
07/26/17 02:59 AM
07/26/17 02:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,922
S.E. Michigan
|
Honestly I think it was kind of cheesy, it was just a bubble flared chunk of steel tubing pressed in the hole. If I remember right it was only sold with the crate motor.
You're probably better off creating something different/better.
If I can scrounge up any more instructions that refer to this, I will look for the sensor and let ya know. I remember absolutely nothing about that from my 8+ run working there, but unfortunately never worked hands on with this intake during that time period.
I agree the price is crazy, always has been, the fellow managing the program was somewhat rushed and the casting/machining work ended up going to high dollar prototype shops instead of mp's normal intake foundry out in CA, the one with the "BB" casting mark (buddy bar). He brought the product to market quickly that way, but after he left mp seemed to be no marketing interest in resourcing/managing it. So there it sits, kind of stuck.
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: Gen3 Mopar Performance Intake
[Re: moparcyco]
#2343525
07/26/17 08:08 AM
07/26/17 08:08 AM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784 Florida
cbusters
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
|
Is that nipple piece still available from Chrysler? Tried searching and calling dealer both came up with nada. measuring the hole looks like it would be easy to machine to 1/4 npt threads which would be much easier to source. Just pisses me off that you have to spend a $1000 dollars for this and can't get parts or have to make stuff work. Since this is the breather port that goes to the air cleaner, I understand that these engines have a tendency to pump oil out of these ports. I am going to run this to an Air Grabber and really don't want to ruin an oval air filter with oil stains. There were oil catch cans for the Gen III's that people upgraded to in the early days, is this where it was "spliced" into? This might effect how I try to fix the missing fitting issue.
|
|
|
|
|