Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: BradH] #2315456
06/03/17 01:55 AM
06/03/17 01:55 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
Originally Posted By BradH
Originally Posted By AndyF

I'm going to be forced to run an Indy intake on my 470 with the new 270 heads and I'm not really a fan of the Indy 4500 intake.

"Hello, Wilson Manifolds. I have another intake for you..."
whistling


Yep, that is exactly what I ended up doing. Wilson did fantastic work as usual. I haven't gotten this engine back on the dyno yet but I'm sure it will pick up some power.

DSC_0690 (Large).JPGDSC_0692 (Large).JPG
Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: AndyF] #2315465
06/03/17 02:47 AM
06/03/17 02:47 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
I see they didn't go w/the razor edges on this one.............. thumbs


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: AndyF] #2315888
06/04/17 11:13 AM
06/04/17 11:13 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 610
long time lurker, short time p...
P
PorkyPig Offline
mopar
PorkyPig  Offline
mopar
P

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 610
long time lurker, short time p...
Any before and after shots that show just how much work went into that intake? Looks like modern art now instead of an car part.

Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: 70VcodeCoronetRT] #2315941
06/04/17 12:50 PM
06/04/17 12:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
Here is one shot that I took as I was marking it up before sending it to Wilson. The plenum area out of the box from Indy was pretty sad looking.

DSC_0538 (Large).JPG
Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: 70VcodeCoronetRT] #2315972
06/04/17 01:58 PM
06/04/17 01:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,724
Nebraska
70VcodeCoronetRT Offline OP
top fuel
70VcodeCoronetRT  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,724
Nebraska
Quick question, do you guys think it's worth going with the 270 over the 240 heads if your using the TF intake? I was told there is not enough meat on it to open it up to the 270 port size. I don't have the room for an Indy intake. This is a low deck so the 337 is out. Thanks

Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: 70VcodeCoronetRT] #2316120
06/04/17 05:58 PM
06/04/17 05:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
I wouldn't spend the money buying new heads if you already have the 240 heads. If haven't bought the heads yet then it might be worth going to the 270 heads even if you run the TF intake. Just be prepared to do some "hot rodding" to get them to work together. Maybe some welding and grinding on the intake for example.

I made 750 hp with the 270 heads on a pump gas 470 shortblock with a standard port intake. But it was a very, very good standard port intake: http://www.hotrod.com/articles/dyno-day-trick-flow-270-mopar-heads/

Last edited by AndyF; 06/04/17 06:00 PM.
Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: 70VcodeCoronetRT] #2316125
06/04/17 06:08 PM
06/04/17 06:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,558
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,558
So. Burlington, Vt.
IMO, TF really should have made the 240 head as a raised runner head....... If for no other reason than to get away from the std bathtub gasket.

I suppose there is an argument to keep them std port height to fit under low hoods, but I feel like the raised std port configuration would be a nice option.

I think if you made your own flat valley plate, and then used some "cut to fit" gaskets like what Hughes sells, and then raised the roof of the port opening as much as the TF or SV intake would facilitate....... You would bridge the performance gap between the 240 and 270 heads.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: 70VcodeCoronetRT] #2316126
06/04/17 06:10 PM
06/04/17 06:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,724
Nebraska
70VcodeCoronetRT Offline OP
top fuel
70VcodeCoronetRT  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,724
Nebraska
Thanks AndyF, Any word if TF will ever offer a matching intake for the 270s?

Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: fast68plymouth] #2316132
06/04/17 06:15 PM
06/04/17 06:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
Originally Posted By fast68plymouth
IMO, TF really should have made the 240 head as a raised runner head....... If for no other reason than to get away from the std bathtub gasket.

I suppose there is an argument to keep them std port height to fit under low hoods, but I feel like the raised std port configuration would be a nice option.

I think if you made your own flat valley plate, and then used some "cut to fit" gaskets like what Hughes sells, and then raised the roof of the port opening as much as the TF or SV intake would facilitate....... You would bridge the performance gap between the 240 and 270 heads.


I agree. I think a raised standard port runner in the extended face 270 casting would be a great head for 470 or smaller engines. The raised runner would make more power than the standard location head but a person would be able to use a standard port intake.

Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: 70VcodeCoronetRT] #2316134
06/04/17 06:18 PM
06/04/17 06:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
Originally Posted By 4406forPOWER
Thanks AndyF, Any word if TF will ever offer a matching intake for the 270s?


I have no idea what Trick Flow is thinking or planning. They don't tell me that kind of stuff. I told them that they need to do a MW intake and I told them that they need to add EFI bosses to their standard port intake but they haven't done either so I suspect that they don't care what I think.

Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: AndyF] #2316140
06/04/17 06:28 PM
06/04/17 06:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,558
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,558
So. Burlington, Vt.
Originally Posted By AndyF
Originally Posted By fast68plymouth
IMO, TF really should have made the 240 head as a raised runner head....... If for no other reason than to get away from the std bathtub gasket.

I suppose there is an argument to keep them std port height to fit under low hoods, but I feel like the raised std port configuration would be a nice option.

I think if you made your own flat valley plate, and then used some "cut to fit" gaskets like what Hughes sells, and then raised the roof of the port opening as much as the TF or SV intake would facilitate....... You would bridge the performance gap between the 240 and 270 heads.


I agree. I think a raised standard port runner in the extended face 270 casting would be a great head for 470 or smaller engines. The raised runner would make more power than the standard location head but a person would be able to use a standard port intake.


At this point, it would just be a matter of them plugging in a std port CNC program into what is now the 270 head.

It would be interesting to take a 270 head, and epoxy up one of the port openings and shrink it down to std size........ And see how much flow it actually loses.
I bet it's not much at all.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: PorkyPig] #2316286
06/04/17 09:39 PM
06/04/17 09:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
Originally Posted By PorkyPig
Any before and after shots that show just how much work went into that intake? Looks like modern art now instead of an car part.


Here is the view down the plenum. Wilson extended two of the runner dividers into the plenum and then fully ported and polished everything.

DSC_0737 (Large).JPG
Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: 70VcodeCoronetRT] #2318307
06/09/17 12:05 AM
06/09/17 12:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
I'm in the process of switching my 470 over to wet sump with a belt drive pump. I'll use this Moroso pan and then add a Petersen belt drive oil pump. Should have it all together in a couple of weeks.

DSC_0770 (Large).JPG
Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: AndyF] #2318636
06/09/17 07:41 PM
06/09/17 07:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
Originally Posted By AndyF
Originally Posted By PorkyPig
Any before and after shots that show just how much work went into that intake? Looks like modern art now instead of an car part.


Here is the view down the plenum. Wilson extended two of the runner dividers into the plenum and then fully ported and polished everything.

I wonder why they didn't add extensions to all of the dividers, instead of only 2? I don't recall having seen it done that way before, since it's usually all of them getting the same modification.

Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: 70VcodeCoronetRT] #2318650
06/09/17 08:11 PM
06/09/17 08:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,310
Oregon
Beats the heck out of me. I figure they know what they are doing, guess we'll see what the dyno says. I'm working on the new oil pump and lines and stuff like that so it might be a few weeks before I get this engine back on the dyno.

In the meantime I've updated my website with the Trick Flow valley plates and batwings and stuff like that. (which is what this thread title says)

Here is the link: http://arengineering.com/home-page/valley-plates/

Re: Trick Flow 270 intake and valley pan? [Re: 70VcodeCoronetRT] #2318950
06/10/17 01:10 PM
06/10/17 01:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,724
Nebraska
70VcodeCoronetRT Offline OP
top fuel
70VcodeCoronetRT  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,724
Nebraska
Will be ordering as soon as I make a final decision on the 240 or 270. Right now I'm leaning on a set of 240 and send them to Larry Smith. Along with the TF intake. This motor will be Procharged. So I think a good set of 240s will get me where I need to be.

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1