.035 quench too tight on a 572?
#2259731
02/26/17 11:32 AM
02/26/17 11:32 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 347 Kewaskum, WI
Kelob_pie
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 347
Kewaskum, WI
|
Hey guys, building a 572 (4.5 x 4.5), however, pistons are in hole .006. I happen to have two sets of Cometic gaskets, one set is .040, which leaves me not enough quench for my liking, and the other set I have is .030 thick. Do you guys think I would be safe with the .030 set??? Just wondering with the big bore how much of an issue piston rock will be. Will be street car (4-speed), rev limiter probably set at 6200ish. Scat crank and rods, Ross pistons.
Thanks!!!
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: Kelob_pie]
#2259787
02/26/17 12:54 PM
02/26/17 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
piston rock depends alot on bore clearance. I worry more about actual gasket thickness being what it is supposed to be. I wouldn't think a 572 would be a high RPM screamer & I'd be OK with a confirmed/measured three times! .035. when done I would see if I could measure the space between the head and the deck anywhere on the outside of the block & more important, on assy with 1 head gasket on, with the block upside down, loosen a rod cap then turn crank till the piston is at TDC & see how far you can push the rod/piston further in till it contacts the head (that is the bottom line that it will see when operating). if its too close you are only out 1 gasket assuming all measurements on both decks everywhere are equal.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: AndyF]
#2259818
02/26/17 01:36 PM
02/26/17 01:36 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300 West Coast, USA
jbc426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
West Coast, USA
|
It should work fine with the 0.030 gaskets at that RPM. If you were going to spin it a lot higher then maybe it would be an issue. Next time you pull the heads you might want to order the 0.036 gaskets. Andy, is the difference in quench effectiveness between .046 and .036 significant enough to make a change to attain the tighter number?
1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's 1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: Kelob_pie]
#2259915
02/26/17 03:18 PM
02/26/17 03:18 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,882 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,882
Bend,OR USA
|
I'm in the middle of assembling a pump gas 340 stroker motor with SRP pistons that have right at .0035 piston to cylinder wall clearances, those pistons rock from .0050 to .0080 on the cam side at the edge of the cylinders with a small screwdriver holding the piston tops towards the cam My old pump gas 400 srtoker motor had .035 with a .042 thick head gasket on both sides of the pistons, it was touching both head on both sides a tiny bit It didn't touch with .047 thick head gaskets after that To many people on here preach things that don't work for me when it comes to clearances in motors we beat on .0010 to much clearance are way safer then .00010 to little Be safe
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 02/26/17 03:18 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: Kelob_pie]
#2260001
02/26/17 05:42 PM
02/26/17 05:42 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,454 Glendora Ca.
Just-a-dart
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,454
Glendora Ca.
|
[quote=Kelob_pie]Compression will be at about 13.6 to 1 with .040 quench. Will be running on E85. Cam is solid roller street grind 267/279 .640 lift. Heads are EZ'z with MCH cnc porting. Also will be running HP EFI system. I think this should make a nice street engine, I would think 650hp shouldn't be an issue. My I would run the .040 gaskets you have and be happy. 572",e85(lots of fuel volume), over 13.5 comp, street motor, 4speed. I agree with Cab.
"Just a Bracket car dressed up like a streetcar"
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: Kelob_pie]
#2260160
02/26/17 10:01 PM
02/26/17 10:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,487 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,487
Kalispell Mt.
|
Check how much piston rock you have, stick a clean wooden dowl on the bottom of an installed piston and push up and measure that way on both sides. Bore size, piston to bore clearance, piston skirt height, bearing clearance can all add up to a supprise, basing it off a calculated clearance is silly or even a static center of the bore measurement. Useing this method I run pretty much any motor at .020 clearance and never had an issue. Measureing this way will give you more of an actual running minimum clearance than taking rod center to center-piston heaght-stroke-deck height or even more acurate than measureing at the center of an idle/static unloaded piston. My only disclaimer is I have only built one aluminum rod engine and it had no quench to speak of so if your useing an AL rod you need to consider that.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: Kelob_pie]
#2260317
02/27/17 03:42 AM
02/27/17 03:42 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
On my 440/493 street eng I am using the basic EZ heads and I use a dished piston to have a 10.6 comp ratio. I run about .046 quench and it runs fine on 91 to 93 pump with 36 total timing all in about 1800 rpm. I use the felpro .039 gaskets and my piston flats are about .006 to .007 down in the cyl. You are running more comp then me but I have had no eng ping at all as I run a full exh and would hear it if it had any ping or spark knock. My cam is 264 & 270 @ .050 with .585 & .592 lift. And if its a street eng you plan to put alot of miles on as I do I would feel better at the .045 quench. Ron
Last edited by 383man; 02/27/17 03:43 AM.
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: Kelob_pie]
#2260390
02/27/17 11:11 AM
02/27/17 11:11 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 253 near St Petersburg, FL
Lifsgrt
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 253
near St Petersburg, FL
|
I find it interesting you're building a street engine at 13.6:1 CR? Guess I need to get out more...
B3 1969 Charger R/T SE, 440/727 with 3:91s running 11.07@120
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: Kelob_pie]
#2260414
02/27/17 11:43 AM
02/27/17 11:43 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,150 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,150
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
Hopefully the motor will never have problems, but a little bore ware, rod bearing going south, and you might hurt a piston or worse. Better to have a safety margin than what, five extra hp?.
8.582, 160.18 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: Lifsgrt]
#2260565
02/27/17 03:27 PM
02/27/17 03:27 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927 Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927
Kirkland, Washington
|
I find it interesting you're building a street engine at 13.6:1 CR? Guess I need to get out more... its an E85 motor.
|
|
|
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572?
[Re: Kelob_pie]
#2260566
02/27/17 03:30 PM
02/27/17 03:30 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927 Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927
Kirkland, Washington
|
Well, I guess you guys convinced me, I'll go for the .036 gaskets. I believe I'll still retain the quench benefits at .042. You already have a set of $150 .040 Cometics and you are willing to spend $150 more just for .004? Man, I'd run the .040's, but yea, I'm cheap.
|
|
|
|
|