Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
.035 quench too tight on a 572? #2259731
02/26/17 11:32 AM
02/26/17 11:32 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 347
Kewaskum, WI
K
Kelob_pie Offline OP
enthusiast
Kelob_pie  Offline OP
enthusiast
K

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 347
Kewaskum, WI
Hey guys, building a 572 (4.5 x 4.5), however, pistons are in hole .006.
I happen to have two sets of Cometic gaskets, one set is .040, which leaves me not enough quench for my liking, and the other set I have is .030 thick.
Do you guys think I would be safe with the .030 set???
Just wondering with the big bore how much of an issue piston rock will be.
Will be street car (4-speed), rev limiter probably set at 6200ish.
Scat crank and rods, Ross pistons.

Thanks!!!

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2259754
02/26/17 12:06 PM
02/26/17 12:06 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,096
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,096
Ontario, Canada
I have .035 quench and for peace of mind I sure would have liked an extra .010 !!!

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2259787
02/26/17 12:54 PM
02/26/17 12:54 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
piston rock depends alot on bore clearance. I worry more about actual gasket thickness being what it is supposed to be. I wouldn't think a 572 would be a high RPM screamer & I'd be OK with a confirmed/measured three times! .035. when done I would see if I could measure the space between the head and the deck anywhere on the outside of the block & more important, on assy with 1 head gasket on, with the block upside down, loosen a rod cap then turn crank till the piston is at TDC & see how far you can push the rod/piston further in till it contacts the head (that is the bottom line that it will see when operating). if its too close you are only out 1 gasket assuming all measurements on both decks everywhere are equal.


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2259794
02/26/17 01:04 PM
02/26/17 01:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,256
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,256
Oregon
It should work fine with the 0.030 gaskets at that RPM. If you were going to spin it a lot higher then maybe it would be an issue. Next time you pull the heads you might want to order the 0.036 gaskets.

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: AndyF] #2259818
02/26/17 01:36 PM
02/26/17 01:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
West Coast, USA
Originally Posted By AndyF
It should work fine with the 0.030 gaskets at that RPM. If you were going to spin it a lot higher then maybe it would be an issue. Next time you pull the heads you might want to order the 0.036 gaskets.


Andy, is the difference in quench effectiveness between .046 and .036 significant enough to make a change to attain the tighter number?


1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2259847
02/26/17 02:07 PM
02/26/17 02:07 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927
Kirkland, Washington
What compression ratio is this bad boy at?

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2259860
02/26/17 02:21 PM
02/26/17 02:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
B G Racing Offline
master
B G Racing  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
There are many factors that need consideration before running that tight of clearance at that bore and stroke.Then throw in the 4-speed factor.I think you already know the answer since it is a street build and the gain of the quench benefit is certainly not worth the risk.Theoretically it is recommended that clearance should be set at .055 with all the factors,we can list many,taken into consideration.We have run race engines as tight as .038 but don't recommend it.

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: B G Racing] #2259913
02/26/17 03:17 PM
02/26/17 03:17 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 347
Kewaskum, WI
K
Kelob_pie Offline OP
enthusiast
Kelob_pie  Offline OP
enthusiast
K

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 347
Kewaskum, WI
Compression will be at about 13.6 to 1 with .040 quench.
Will be running on E85. Cam is solid roller street grind 267/279 .640 lift.
Heads are EZ'z with MCH cnc porting.
Also will be running HP EFI system. I think this should make a nice street engine, I would think 650hp shouldn't be an issue.


I suppose I could get the .036 gaskets, maybe that would be the way to go ($450 laying around in head gaskets, ouch).
I'll still ponder on it, thanks for all the replies so far!

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2259915
02/26/17 03:18 PM
02/26/17 03:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,882
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,882
Bend,OR USA
I'm in the middle of assembling a pump gas 340 stroker motor with SRP pistons that have right at .0035 piston to cylinder wall clearances, those pistons rock from .0050 to .0080 on the cam side at the edge of the cylinders with a small screwdriver holding the piston tops towards the cam shruggy My old pump gas 400 srtoker motor had .035 with a .042 thick head gasket on both sides of the pistons, it was touching both head on both sides a tiny bit shruggy It didn't touch with .047 thick head gaskets after that thumbs
To many people on here preach things that don't work for me when it comes to clearances in motors we beat on work .0010 to much clearance are way safer then .00010 to little shruggy
Be safe thumbs

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 02/26/17 03:18 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2260001
02/26/17 05:42 PM
02/26/17 05:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,454
Glendora Ca.
J
Just-a-dart Offline
pro stock
Just-a-dart  Offline
pro stock
J

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,454
Glendora Ca.
[quote=Kelob_pie]Compression will be at about 13.6 to 1 with .040 quench.
Will be running on E85. Cam is solid roller street grind 267/279 .640 lift.
Heads are EZ'z with MCH cnc porting.
Also will be running HP EFI system. I think this should make a nice street engine, I would think 650hp shouldn't be an issue.


My twocents I would run the .040 gaskets you have and be happy.

572",e85(lots of fuel volume), over 13.5 comp, street motor, 4speed. I agree with Cab.



"Just a Bracket car dressed up like a streetcar"
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2260061
02/26/17 07:32 PM
02/26/17 07:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
B G Racing Offline
master
B G Racing  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
At that C/R and the added information we would recommend you use at least use a .040/.041 head gasket.E85 is not always E85 it could be less and sometimes garbage depending on the source.Save yourself a lot of grief. up

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2260112
02/26/17 09:01 PM
02/26/17 09:01 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 905
Missouri
J
jwb123 Offline
super stock
jwb123  Offline
super stock
J

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 905
Missouri
You might be able to get by with the Quench that tight, but I would make sure every cylinder has the same quench. Production tolerances may give you less on some cylinders. I have run them as tight as .038 and had no trouble. Seen one set at .030, and you could read the part number of the piston on the cylinder head when they took it apart, ran for a season, didn't see any damage but it was set a .040 when it went back together.

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2260160
02/26/17 10:01 PM
02/26/17 10:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,487
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,487
Kalispell Mt.
Check how much piston rock you have, stick a clean wooden dowl on the bottom of an installed piston and push up and measure that way on both sides. Bore size, piston to bore clearance, piston skirt height, bearing clearance can all add up to a supprise, basing it off a calculated clearance is silly or even a static center of the bore measurement. Useing this method I run pretty much any motor at .020 clearance and never had an issue. Measureing this way will give you more of an actual running minimum clearance than taking rod center to center-piston heaght-stroke-deck height or even more acurate than measureing at the center of an idle/static unloaded piston. My only disclaimer is I have only built one aluminum rod engine and it had no quench to speak of so if your useing an AL rod you need to consider that.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2260317
02/27/17 03:42 AM
02/27/17 03:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
On my 440/493 street eng I am using the basic EZ heads and I use a dished piston to have a 10.6 comp ratio. I run about .046 quench and it runs fine on 91 to 93 pump with 36 total timing all in about 1800 rpm. I use the felpro .039 gaskets and my piston flats are about .006 to .007 down in the cyl. You are running more comp then me but I have had no eng ping at all as I run a full exh and would hear it if it had any ping or spark knock. My cam is 264 & 270 @ .050 with .585 & .592 lift. And if its a street eng you plan to put alot of miles on as I do I would feel better at the .045 quench. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 02/27/17 03:43 AM.
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2260390
02/27/17 11:11 AM
02/27/17 11:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 253
near St Petersburg, FL
Lifsgrt Offline
enthusiast
Lifsgrt  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 253
near St Petersburg, FL
I find it interesting you're building a street engine at 13.6:1 CR? Guess I need to get out more...


B3 1969 Charger R/T SE, 440/727 with 3:91s running 11.07@120
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2260414
02/27/17 11:43 AM
02/27/17 11:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,150
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
I Live Here
gregsdart  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,150
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
Hopefully the motor will never have problems, but a little bore ware, rod bearing going south, and you might hurt a piston or worse. Better to have a safety margin than what, five extra hp?.


8.582, 160.18 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: gregsdart] #2260556
02/27/17 03:04 PM
02/27/17 03:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
To that add crank flex. AndyF has a lot of dyno time under his belt and he's probably right, but I'm thinking a piston that big and a crank that flexible (because of the lack of overlap due to the long stroke and small pin diameter) would push me to add the extra clearance. You'll never notice the tiny drop in performance.

R.

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: dogdays] #2260559
02/27/17 03:09 PM
02/27/17 03:09 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 347
Kewaskum, WI
K
Kelob_pie Offline OP
enthusiast
Kelob_pie  Offline OP
enthusiast
K

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 347
Kewaskum, WI
Well, I guess you guys convinced me, I'll go for the .036 gaskets.
I believe I'll still retain the quench benefits at .042.

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Lifsgrt] #2260565
02/27/17 03:27 PM
02/27/17 03:27 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927
Kirkland, Washington
Originally Posted By Lifsgrt
I find it interesting you're building a street engine at 13.6:1 CR? Guess I need to get out more...


its an E85 motor.

Re: .035 quench too tight on a 572? [Re: Kelob_pie] #2260566
02/27/17 03:30 PM
02/27/17 03:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,927
Kirkland, Washington
Originally Posted By Kelob_pie
Well, I guess you guys convinced me, I'll go for the .036 gaskets.
I believe I'll still retain the quench benefits at .042.


You already have a set of $150 .040 Cometics and you are willing to spend $150 more just for .004?

Man, I'd run the .040's, but yea, I'm cheap.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1