Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 1.7 Rockers ... why so rare? [Re: Scott440] #2219378
12/23/16 12:47 AM
12/23/16 12:47 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,689
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,689
W. Kentucky
My comp solid roller has .432/.436 lobes, theoretically with my T&D 1.7's and zero lash the lift should be .734/.741". With .018" lash my lift at the retainers was .711/.719", with the lash added back it's .729/.737".

Re: 1.7 Rockers ... why so rare? [Re: justinp61] #2219583
12/23/16 01:42 PM
12/23/16 01:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515
So. Burlington, Vt.
Originally Posted By justinp61
My comp solid roller has .432/.436 lobes, theoretically with my T&D 1.7's and zero lash the lift should be .734/.741". With .018" lash my lift at the retainers was .711/.719", with the lash added back it's .729/.737".


With checking springs or full spring pressure?


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: 1.7 Rockers ... why so rare? [Re: Cab_Burge] #2219585
12/23/16 01:43 PM
12/23/16 01:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515
So. Burlington, Vt.
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
I tried to respond and this web site dumped it runaway Pierre at Smith Bros. didn't offer to replace them after I pointed out that I had paid for the .120 wall and he wasn't going to replace the two bad ones until one of the shop supervisors came in and looked at both of them and told Pierre to replace them both for no charge.
Needles to say I normally buy Manton now at a better price and get what I order and pay for up
Smith Bros. was here in Bend back then, they moved to Redmond, OR (23 miles further north now) several years back. I started buying pushrods from the original owner back in the late 1960s when they where in West Covina, CA, that guy was a real jerk down His Son was a lot better to deal with thumbs His Son moved the business up here to Bend a long time before I moved here in 2005 and I think he sold it to the current owners in that time frame, 2004 to 2006 confused


I still use Smith Bros, but if I had/have an experience like that I'd have switched too.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: 1.7 Rockers ... why so rare? [Re: fast68plymouth] #2219605
12/23/16 01:59 PM
12/23/16 01:59 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,689
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,689
W. Kentucky
Originally Posted By fast68plymouth
Originally Posted By justinp61
My comp solid roller has .432/.436 lobes, theoretically with my T&D 1.7's and zero lash the lift should be .734/.741". With .018" lash my lift at the retainers was .711/.719", with the lash added back it's .729/.737".


With checking springs or full spring pressure?


Full spring pressure.

BTW this is a Indy headed small block.

Last edited by justinp61; 12/23/16 02:00 PM.
Re: 1.7 Rockers ... why so rare? [Re: Scott440] #2219637
12/23/16 02:40 PM
12/23/16 02:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515
So. Burlington, Vt.
That's really really good if it's a 59deg block.

The worst case I've seen with aftermarket rockers was on some TA heads that had HS rockers on them. The rocker stands had been milled off, and they had the blocks around the shafts, along with the offset shafts(iirc) like W2 heads.
Going off memory, they were about 1.46 on the exhaust, 1.45 on the offset rocker intakes...... With checking springs.
With 500lbs open spring pressure they were down around 1.43-1.44.

On the BB ones I've checked, using rockers with the std offset, both Crane and HS seem to have about .5 added ratio built in when checking with soft springs(depending on exactly where you have the adjuster set).
The HS seem so have less deflection and are usually still higher than the advertised ratio even with 600lbs+ open pressure.
I had a set of HS 1.6's on some SR heads...... Checked about 1.67 with soft springs, were still 1.62-1.63 with 700lbs open pressure.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: 1.7 Rockers ... why so rare? [Re: Scott440] #2219642
12/23/16 02:47 PM
12/23/16 02:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,689
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,689
W. Kentucky
It's a 59*. I mentioned it to Brett in one of our phone conversations and he seemed to think maybe T&D put more ratio in them to offset the losses.

Re: 1.7 Rockers ... why so rare? [Re: justinp61] #2219644
12/23/16 02:54 PM
12/23/16 02:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515
So. Burlington, Vt.
Originally Posted By justinp61
It's a 59*. I mentioned it to Brett in one of our phone conversations and he seemed to think maybe T&D put more ratio in them to offset the losses.


They would have pretty much had to.
You get loss from the pushrods and lifters not being in line with each other.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1