Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: 440Jim] #2197479
11/16/16 06:53 PM
11/16/16 06:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By 440Jim
Originally Posted By dvw
As far as vicosity vs temop. Drag motors don't gain a lot of oil temp. Mine seldom exceeds 160 with a diaper.
Doug
I was going to say something similar for drag race applications. I typically saw between 130-160F oil temp. And some days it took serious engine warm up to get the oil up to 130F.
At 140F, I am thinking a 10W-30 would be about 90 SUS.
At 200F, I am thinking a 20W-50 would be about 100 SUS.
IMO, Pretty close at associated operating temperatures.
And as previously posted, specific brands can vary from each other. I have been using 10W-30 in my drag cars for years. But in my street/strip car, I use 20W-50.

I agree with what BradH said:
Quote:
From the dual-purpose car perspective, I know my oil gets plenty of heat during street use, including the trips to the track
It wouldn't surprise me if after driving 30 minutes with water temp around 180F, the oil would be around 200F.



Your temp assumptions are correct, if the oil was built in the middle of the grade, or the high end.

What if you bought a 10w30 and the oil, out of the can, was on the low end for a 30? At temp it is out of grade.

IIRC, to pass the API grade, and oil only has to pass the test 5 times out of 10, again, IIRC. They don't have to pass 100% of the tests.

That's why testing oil is expensive. You have to monitor oil temps very close, among other things.

IMHO, a good oil is built on the high end of the grade. That's one reason why it's difficult to compare a 40 of one brand to a 40 of another, without knowing EXACTLY where the oil tested in the grade. One oil could be on the high end (almost a 50) and the other on the low end (almost a 30) and you end up spending a bunch of time trying to figure out why the high dollar oil is down on power (assuming the expensive oil is on the high side of the grade, which most of the ones I know of are, and the cheaper oils are usually on the low side of grade) compared to a cheap oil. In that case, you would test a high grade 30 (almost a 40) against the cheaper 40 (almost a 30) and th results would be more accurate.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: BradH] #2197553
11/16/16 09:35 PM
11/16/16 09:35 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,871
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,871
MI, usa
Why would the cheap oil be towards the low side of the grade number? 20,30,40 all costs the same. Less film strength, additive package, and base stock you bet, but viscosity?
Doug

Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: dvw] #2197565
11/16/16 09:55 PM
11/16/16 09:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By dvw
Why would the cheap oil be towards the low side of the grade number? 20,30,40 all costs the same. Less film strength, additive package, and base stock you bet, but viscosity?
Doug


It has more to do with fuel economy and incompetent regulation, like CAFE standards.

And all oils don't cost the same to manufacture.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Cab_Burge] #2197607
11/16/16 10:54 PM
11/16/16 10:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
I never saw the oil temps exceed the water temps in my old street Duster, same thing on the tranny temps. shruggy It had the stock OEM 1970/1971 6 quart street hemi Mopar brand oil pan on it with no oil cooler confused
That was with 5w20WT Valvoline petroleum oil and loose (.003+ rods and.004+ main) bearing clearances shruggy
Oil temp will easily exceed water temp if you are using block filler. With 1/2 fill, my oil temp sees 212 while my water temp is at 180. - 10W30 Royal Purple full synthetic race oil. Per Royal Purple, most run too low oil temps - claims their synthetic will easily handle 250+ temps with no ill effects. shruggy Think they were mostly referring to expunging water from the crankcase. At idle start up I am looking at 70 psi. At idle and 212 oil temp I am looking at about 25 psi.( makes me a little nervous) Yes, it has been my experience that synthetics are more prone to leaks. I switch to 10W40 in real hot weather.


Fastest 300
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Crizila] #2197625
11/16/16 11:16 PM
11/16/16 11:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,284
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,284
Bend,OR USA
I wouldn't and don't use block fillers in any of the engine I build due to the oil temps and cylinder wall heat and expansion differences tsk I'm old and I don't like a lot of the changes in a lot of the things we have to deal today runaway stirthepot devil
I regularly saw 15 to 20 lbs oil pressure at 850 RPM idling in gear with my duster with 180+F oil temps with that 5w20WT oil, 30+lbs at 1200 RPM shruggy
As far as oil temps my air cooled airplane motor had a oil thermostat to make the oil get up to 190 F before opening the lines to the oil cooler so it would boil the water out of the motor from condensation up I used 15W40Wt in it.
I was told in commercial flight training that petroleum based oils would start to deteriorate and destruct the oil molecule at or above 325F, synthetics where good to 500+F shruggy
ATF has added dyes that will start to change colors from red at 275F and be black at 325F work

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 11/16/16 11:23 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Cab_Burge] #2197640
11/16/16 11:32 PM
11/16/16 11:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
Skeptic Offline
master
Skeptic  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
ANY oil pressure at idle hot is fine. Our 500" inline 6 cyl CNG buses barely register @ idle hot and have NO issues, dragging around 33K pound transits running 21psi boost. The big diesels are the same lot's of boost and hardly any hot idle oil pressure- 10 psi/1000 rpm just works, more than that you are throwing away power and overheating your oil by pumping it past the bypass back into the crankcase. twocents

Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Skeptic] #2197689
11/17/16 12:09 AM
11/17/16 12:09 AM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By Skeptic
ANY oil pressure at idle hot is fine. Our 500" inline 6 cyl CNG buses barely register @ idle hot and have NO issues, dragging around 33K pound transits running 21psi boost. The big diesels are the same lot's of boost and hardly any hot idle oil pressure- 10 psi/1000 rpm just works, more than that you are throwing away power and overheating your oil by pumping it past the bypass back into the crankcase. twocents


If you don't run any spring pressure. The higher the spring pressure, the harder the low oil pressure at idle is on cam bearings, pushrod cups, adjusters and rockers and shafts. Anything over 120 on the seat and you need more idle oil pressure.


Roller cam bearings have more than one person.

Last edited by madscientist; 11/17/16 12:10 AM.

Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: madscientist] #2197919
11/17/16 01:00 PM
11/17/16 01:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Mattax Offline
top fuel
Mattax  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
As far as viscosity at specific temperature goes, that can be calculated or graphed. You just need the viscosity at 40 and 100 C which almost all manufacturers provide on-line if you hunt. This is also a way to compare specific oils, say a brand X PAO synthetic vs. its conventional, vs a Brand B semisynthetic.
Viscosity Graphing page
Operational Viscosity

As far as how far they fall off in use, that's a good point and will require sending a sample of used oil to a testing company.
Originally Posted By madscientist
Originally Posted By 440Jim
Originally Posted By dvw
As far as vicosity vs temop. Drag motors don't gain a lot of oil temp. Mine seldom exceeds 160 with a diaper.
Doug
I was going to say something similar for drag race applications. I typically saw between 130-160F oil temp. And some days it took serious engine warm up to get the oil up to 130F.
At 140F, I am thinking a 10W-30 would be about 90 SUS.
At 200F, I am thinking a 20W-50 would be about 100 SUS.
IMO, Pretty close at associated operating temperatures.
And as previously posted, specific brands can vary from each other....



Your temp assumptions are correct, if the oil was built in the middle of the grade, or the high end.

What if you bought a 10w30 and the oil, out of the can, was on the low end for a 30? At temp it is out of grade.

IIRC, to pass the API grade, and oil only has to pass the test 5 times out of 10, again, IIRC. They don't have to pass 100% of the tests.
...

PS. Brad - Thanks for posting that!

Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: dthemi] #2197928
11/17/16 01:14 PM
11/17/16 01:14 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Originally Posted By dthemi
What's really cool to me is PS engines run at 10,000 rpm, 1500hp with oil as light as kerosene, and have less oil pressure than my hot idle pressure. The bearings look perfect too. Just Amazing to me


I brought this up a while ago when I freeze framed the crew strapping in Greg Anderson and Erica Enders at a race and saw the oil was around 20 lbs at idle and figured we're good. The 10 lbs per 1000 seems safe enuff............

Last edited by Thumperdart; 11/17/16 01:22 PM.

72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Thumperdart] #2197940
11/17/16 01:41 PM
11/17/16 01:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By Thumperdart
Originally Posted By dthemi
What's really cool to me is PS engines run at 10,000 rpm, 1500hp with oil as light as kerosene, and have less oil pressure than my hot idle pressure. The bearings look perfect too. Just Amazing to me


I brought this up a while ago when I freeze framed the crew strapping in Greg Anderson and Erica Enders at a race and saw the oil was around 20 lbs at idle and figured we're good. The 10 lbs per 1000 seems safe enuff............



Like I posted earlier, you have to remember PS has extra cam bearings, and they are almost always roller bearings. That alone allows for much less pressure, and way less volume of oil at the cam.

There isn't much oil in those engines that isn't accounted for.

Smaller bearings, rigid blocks and cranks allow smaller clearance. Cold blocks and coolant allow thinner oils. Thinner oils equals less pressure.

Not a good idea for the average guy to follow the PS lead on this.

David Reher has published this and it can be found on the RMRE web site.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: madscientist] #2197966
11/17/16 02:23 PM
11/17/16 02:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
I understand those are purpose built race cars which makes sense and I have been running 5w30 wt oils for years now and see temps from the teens to 114+ and my bearings looked real good after my usual 5+ year teardowns/freshen ups. When I see guys recommend 20w50 because of wider(race)bearing clearances I cringe unless your cars sits in the sun at 100+ degrees before start ups............


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Thumperdart] #2198039
11/17/16 04:34 PM
11/17/16 04:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Originally Posted By Thumperdart
I understand those are purpose built race cars which makes sense and I have been running 5w30 wt oils for years now and see temps from the teens to 114+ and my bearings looked real good after my usual 5+ year teardowns/freshen ups. When I see guys recommend 20w50 because of wider(race)bearing clearances I cringe unless your cars sits in the sun at 100+ degrees before start ups............
Not that uncommon to race in 100* temps in the Phoenix / Tucson area. Pulled in to the track in Tucson a few years ago and it was 105 - in the evening!! Yes, 10 lbs per 1000 rpm is generally accepted as the standard. What is the general rule on viscosity change when switching from petroleum to synthetic? - all else being equal.


Fastest 300
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Crizila] #2198058
11/17/16 05:07 PM
11/17/16 05:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By Crizila
Originally Posted By Thumperdart
I understand those are purpose built race cars which makes sense and I have been running 5w30 wt oils for years now and see temps from the teens to 114+ and my bearings looked real good after my usual 5+ year teardowns/freshen ups. When I see guys recommend 20w50 because of wider(race)bearing clearances I cringe unless your cars sits in the sun at 100+ degrees before start ups............
Not that uncommon to race in 100* temps in the Phoenix / Tucson area. Pulled in to the track in Tucson a few years ago and it was 105 - in the evening!! Yes, 10 lbs per 1000 rpm is generally accepted as the standard. What is the general rule on viscosity change when switching from petroleum to synthetic? - all else being equal.


Depends on whose oil you start with, and whose oil you change to.

I'd never change oil without talking to the manufacturer of the oil.

You can buy a 40 that is almost a 50. What if you are running a 40 that barely makes a 40 and then you switch to an oil that is a 40 but is almost a 50?

There need to be more time spent learning about oil.

Testing oil is very costly. I have seen testing done in a sloppy manner, where a great oil made less HP than a cheap oil. It was piss poor testing.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Crizila] #2198063
11/17/16 05:29 PM
11/17/16 05:29 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Originally Posted By Crizila
Originally Posted By Thumperdart
I understand those are purpose built race cars which makes sense and I have been running 5w30 wt oils for years now and see temps from the teens to 114+ and my bearings looked real good after my usual 5+ year teardowns/freshen ups. When I see guys recommend 20w50 because of wider(race)bearing clearances I cringe unless your cars sits in the sun at 100+ degrees before start ups............
Not that uncommon to race in 100* temps in the Phoenix / Tucson area. Pulled in to the track in Tucson a few years ago and it was 105 - in the evening!! Yes, 10 lbs per 1000 rpm is generally accepted as the standard. What is the general rule on viscosity change when switching from petroleum to synthetic? - all else being equal.


That was my point about 100+ heat allowing for the thicker oils and I just changed mine and went w/5 qts. of Valvoline Syn. and 2 qts. of regular dino Valvoline both in 5w30 and a K&N 3001 filter.........Even in the summer I street drive w/thinner oils and at the very hottest here in the high desert where 110+ is common and hotter, I still have 25+ oil pressure at idle and it quickly jumps when revved........... thumbs


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Cab_Burge] #2198070
11/17/16 05:39 PM
11/17/16 05:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
S
Scully Offline
enthusiast
Scully  Offline
enthusiast
S

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
The first motor, 1962 pump gas 426 M.W., I dyno tuned lost 30 HP going from Valvoline 30 WT detergent oil to Mobil 1 10x30 WT shock
It was slightly seeping oil through the intake port gaskets on #2,#5 and #7, those spark plugs where slightly shiny before the oil change. After the first pull with the Mobil 1 they where all (8) oiling bad shruggy Synthetics lubes will leak past gaskets that regular lubes won't shruggy
I've heard that most motors that are sealed up good will gain some HP and torque changing to a good brand of synthetics lubricants shruggy I haven't done any other test on them since back then in 1991, once bit, twice shy work

On the Max, it's best to use the Fel-Pro 1218 and then coat them all around with a shellac type of sealant before installing, Jerry Stein taught me that trick.

Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: BradH] #2198071
11/17/16 05:41 PM
11/17/16 05:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline OP
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline OP
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
The spec sheets available for pretty much every oil I'll ever use contain the viscosity #s that are used to find a "heavy" 30 or a "light" 40. That's why I posted those charts previously to make it easier for people to see things like this.

Oh, I haven't seen any pattern when checking the #s that indicates the "better" oils come in at the high end of their advertised weight. The brand doesn't matter; they can be all over the viscosity range for a given weight.



Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: Crizila] #2198073
11/17/16 05:48 PM
11/17/16 05:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline OP
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline OP
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
Originally Posted By Crizila
What is the general rule on viscosity change when switching from petroleum to synthetic? - all else being equal.

There isn't one. Viscosity is viscosity; synthetic oils advantages start with the ability to operate under higher temperatures before they break down. The additive package for one synthetic could be weaker than a comparable petroleum, so there's no guarantee it's a "better" oil under normal operating temperatures.

Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: BradH] #2198077
11/17/16 05:54 PM
11/17/16 05:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By BradH
The spec sheets available for pretty much every I'll ever use contain the viscosity #s that are used to find a "heavy" 30 or a "light" 40. That's why I posted those charts previously to make it easier for people to see things like this.

Oh, I haven't seen any pattern when checking the #s that indicates the "better" oils come in at the high end of their advertised weight. The brand doesn't matter; they can be all over the viscosity range for a given weight.




Exactly. The manufacturers have a wide field to work with as far as viscosity is concerned.

And your correct, most manufacturers post their oil specs on a web page. I'd rather call them


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: madscientist] #2198122
11/17/16 07:08 PM
11/17/16 07:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
I keep reading about stiffer blocks and cranks. Well, maybe the blocks if going from grey cast (20 million PSI) to nodular or Compacted Graphite (25 to 30 million PSI).

For the cranks, however, if we start out with a standard stock forged crank and change material to 4340, it is maybe 3% stiffer.
When we change the journal size to smaller diameter the crank loses stiffness, it is a natural fact. There is no material that is stiffer than steel that a crank can be made from, except molybdenum, and I don't remember ever seeing molybdenum in its pure form, ready to be cut into a crank. Plus, moly is about 30% more dense than steel.

R.

Re: Oil Viscosity vs Bearing Clearance [Re: BradH] #2198134
11/17/16 07:33 PM
11/17/16 07:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,080
organ
M
maximum entropy Offline
master
maximum entropy  Offline
master
M

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,080
organ
i took some really cool classes in college, and if i remember correctly, the winter number is not a viscosity, but a behavior. it BEHAVES like a 10 weight oil. it equals the lubricating qualities of a 10 weight at the specified temperatures. it was exactly one million years ago tomorrow, so i could be wrong.


for what is the good life if not doing things thoughtfully?
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1