Cam for a 512
#2016696
02/21/16 05:24 PM
02/21/16 05:24 PM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62 Indianapolis
Roadrunner451
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
|
Thought I had better start my own thread before I mess up another one.
I need to make a decision on a cam for my combo. The one I have might be just fine, and I've contacted a few cam grinders and received back two very different cam recommendations.
My combo is a 68 roadrunner, 3600 lbs with me in it, 3.91 gears, what should be a 4500 stall 9.5" converter, 512 low deck, 10.8 compression, Indy s/r heads with max wedge ports currently getting worked on at M&M, Indy single plane, AED 1000 hp. The cam I have now is a solid roller single pattern 292 adv 261@50 .648 lift on a 108 l/c installed at 104. The intended use here is street strip, hence the low compression and modest gearing. I only drive it in good weather and don't go too terribly far with it. I just want it to go as fast as possible at the track and I'm not too concerned with street manners. If I have to do maintenance on it every year, that's ok with me.
The first cam that was recommended was a solid roller 276&50 .660 lift intake, 284&50 .664 lift exhaust on a 112 L/c they didn't say where they wanted the cl to be. the second one was another solid roller 263&50 .675 lift intake 269&50 .650 lift exhaust on a 108 l/c installed at 104.
Quite a bit different I would think. What would you guys do here ?
Last edited by Roadrunner451; 02/21/16 06:02 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: AndyF]
#2016945
02/21/16 11:10 PM
02/21/16 11:10 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,744 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,744
Bend,OR USA
|
Your current cam seems fine to me for 512 inches with 10.8 compression. I wouldn't go much bigger that is for sure. The 263/269 cam that someone recommended for you would also work if your valve springs are good for the extra lift but I really doubt you would see enough difference to justify the cost of switching. My 517 C.I.(4.300 stroke in a 400 block) pump gas 3450 lb Duster with a similar motor and heads ran bottom tens(10.001) and high nines on Oregon 91 octane pump gas through the 3 inch exhaust at Wodburn Or. in the summer That cam was a Com Cams with 260@.050 and .420 lobe lift on the intake side, 266 @.050 with .409 lobe lift on the exhausts side with a set of Harland Sharp 1.65 ratio rockers Try changing one thing at a time so you can see real world results on your own Let us know what they are also
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 02/21/16 11:11 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: Roadrunner451]
#2017148
02/22/16 03:16 AM
02/22/16 03:16 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Ok then, well I guess I'll keep the cam I have for now. I think I'm still going to look into getting my dynamic compression up to about 8.5 though.
I think the first change I would make is higher ratio rockers. How much is it raced VS street driving.. have you done a compression test.. what is it... I wouldnt waste the money on a new cam.. your very close now
Last edited by MR_P_BODY; 02/22/16 03:17 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#2017156
02/22/16 03:26 AM
02/22/16 03:26 AM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62 Indianapolis
Roadrunner451
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
|
Ok then, well I guess I'll keep the cam I have for now. I think I'm still going to look into getting my dynamic compression up to about 8.5 though.
I think the first change I would make is higher ratio rockers. How much is it raced VS street driving.. have you done a compression test.. what is it... I wouldnt waste the money on a new cam.. your very close now I would say about 60/40 street to track. My house is literally 5 minutes away from the front gate at IRP. No, haven't done a compression check.
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: Roadrunner451]
#2017159
02/22/16 03:27 AM
02/22/16 03:27 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
I did run it when it was a 451. It seemed ok then. No problems really and I drove the heck out of it on the street. Was a bit of a disappointment at the track, but it had other issues. Lets just say finding a good shop is not always easy.
I was just reading some of the things posted in Tex's 505 thread, and thought that perhaps a bit more cam would work out well for me, as now would be the time to do it. It's good to get feed back from people much more experienced with this. Since it was a bit of disappointment at the track I would ask what was your 60' time.. that tells a lot
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#2017163
02/22/16 03:33 AM
02/22/16 03:33 AM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62 Indianapolis
Roadrunner451
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
|
I did run it when it was a 451. It seemed ok then. No problems really and I drove the heck out of it on the street. Was a bit of a disappointment at the track, but it had other issues. Lets just say finding a good shop is not always easy.
I was just reading some of the things posted in Tex's 505 thread, and thought that perhaps a bit more cam would work out well for me, as now would be the time to do it. It's good to get feed back from people much more experienced with this. Since it was a bit of disappointment at the track I would ask what was your 60' time.. that tells a lot I don't have a time slip in front of me, and where they are now is a bit of a mystery.....getting married means not knowing where your stuff is now apparently. But as remember it was 1.65. It didn't dead hook. Didn't miles an hour all that great either. 11.48 at 118.5
Last edited by Roadrunner451; 02/22/16 03:42 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: Roadrunner451]
#2017227
02/22/16 09:14 AM
02/22/16 09:14 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,333 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,333
Prospect, PA
|
I did run it when it was a 451. It seemed ok then. No problems really and I drove the heck out of it on the street. Was a bit of a disappointment at the track, but it had other issues. Lets just say finding a good shop is not always easy.
I was just reading some of the things posted in Tex's 505 thread, and thought that perhaps a bit more cam would work out well for me, as now would be the time to do it. It's good to get feed back from people much more experienced with this. Since it was a bit of disappointment at the track I would ask what was your 60' time.. that tells a lot I don't have a time slip in front of me, and where they are now is a bit of a mystery.....getting married means not knowing where your stuff is now apparently. But as remember it was 1.65. It didn't dead hook. Didn't miles an hour all that great either. 11.48 at 118.5 Something does not seem right. Seems like you might have another problem that you should find before replacing the cam.
Last edited by BSB67; 02/22/16 09:19 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: Roadrunner451]
#2017362
02/22/16 02:00 PM
02/22/16 02:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,539 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,539
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
There isn't quite enough info to tell if you could/should run more cam than you have now or not. Primarily, header size and the make up of the exhaust system.
My preference is to build to a targeted goal, then work towards that end. As long as the goals and budget are on the same page, I find that to be a better way to approach it.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2017373
02/22/16 02:20 PM
02/22/16 02:20 PM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62 Indianapolis
Roadrunner451
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
|
There isn't quite enough info to tell if you could/should run more cam than you have now or not. Primarily, header size and the make up of the exhaust system.
My preference is to build to a targeted goal, then work towards that end. As long as the goals and budget are on the same page, I find that to be a better way to approach it. The headers are the TTI step headers for Indy heads. 2"x2 1/8" into a 3 1/2" collector. That goes into a Dr.Gas 3 1/2" X pipe that reduces down to 3" after the X. Then it's to the biggest case 3" Magnaflows and then it's 3" mandrel bent over the axle to the back of the car. I really don't have a set time I want to see, so I'm probably not approaching this the right way. I just want fast within the limits of pump gas and 3.91 rear gears, and I can go to e85 as that's pretty easy to get here.
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: Roadrunner451]
#2017429
02/22/16 03:29 PM
02/22/16 03:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,539 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,539
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Without a specific goal in mind, about the best I can offer is the cam you have is appropriately sized for pump gas and 3.91 gears. Since you already own it, I'd just try it and see if it runs well enough for you to be satisfied.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: Roadrunner451]
#2017432
02/22/16 03:35 PM
02/22/16 03:35 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318 State of confusion
Thumperdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
|
Yes, for sure. This is a new motor though, not the one that ran the 11.48. I'd like to get this one right so I don't have another underachiever.
Besides issues with the exhaust (3" pipe attached directly to the 3 1/2" collector, poor muffler choice) the dynamic compression was pretty low 7.35. I don't remember what the cranking compression was, that was a while ago. The carb was on the small side too. What carb...........that can make or break good 60`s and overall driveability............
72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2017450
02/22/16 03:46 PM
02/22/16 03:46 PM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62 Indianapolis
Roadrunner451
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
|
Without a specific goal in mind, about the best I can offer is the cam you have is appropriately sized for pump gas and 3.91 gears. Since you already own it, I'd just try it and see if it runs well enough for you to be satisfied. That makes sense. The general consensus seems to be run what I already have as it's not bad, make sure everything else is good, see how it runs and go from there. So that's what I'll do. I will be checking where this cam is installed at as I don't trust anyone anymore.
|
|
|
Re: Cam for a 512
[Re: Thumperdart]
#2017453
02/22/16 03:49 PM
02/22/16 03:49 PM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62 Indianapolis
Roadrunner451
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
|
Yes, for sure. This is a new motor though, not the one that ran the 11.48. I'd like to get this one right so I don't have another underachiever.
Besides issues with the exhaust (3" pipe attached directly to the 3 1/2" collector, poor muffler choice) the dynamic compression was pretty low 7.35. I don't remember what the cranking compression was, that was a while ago. The carb was on the small side too. What carb...........that can make or break good 60`s and overall driveability............ On that 451 motor I ran an old Holley 950 HP, which I still have. I also have a Quickfuel 950 with downleg boosters, and an AED 1000Hp with their new wazoo annulars.
|
|
|
|
|