Low deck stroker intake?
#2004869
02/03/16 03:39 PM
02/03/16 03:39 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,450 Michigan
MarkZ
OP
Worthy
|
OP
Worthy
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,450
Michigan
|
The more I read on this the more unsure I get. I'm building a 512 out of a 400 block and I'm currently in the bolt-on parts collecting phase. I need some opinions on what intake to run. Heads will most likely be worked over Edelbrocks or Trick Flows. This will be a 100% street driven motor and won't be spun past 6,000 RPM. Eventually it will get some kind of TBI setup as well.
I'm probably over thinking this and should just get an RPM Performer and be done with it. Ideas?
1987 Fifth Avenue - 512/518/D60
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: MarkZ]
#2004885
02/03/16 03:56 PM
02/03/16 03:56 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,272 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,272
Bend,OR USA
|
The camshaft, converter, rear gear ratio carb. size and intake manifold all need to match the intended application for the motor. That being said most single plane intakes are not very responsive at or below 2500 RPM and they will make more HP and torque above 4500 than a decent dual plane intake will on the same storker motor like yours I have dyno tested several different intake combinations on 500 to 700 HP pump gas street motors and I like and use the Eddy Performer RPM on most of the normal guys motors. If they want the fastest and baddest sounding street cars then they get the M.W. heads and bigger and better single plane intakes that match the heads, cam and so on
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 02/03/16 03:56 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: MarkZ]
#2004927
02/03/16 05:01 PM
02/03/16 05:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 250 Iceland
BadMoonRacer
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 250
Iceland
|
I agree with Andy and Cab. I use the Performer RPM dual plane on my 451 stroker (around 530 hp) going through the traps at 5.600 rpm at high elevens in a 4.000 lbs Charger with 4.10:1 gears and a 10" converter on regular (i.e. non-softcompound tires) Firestone Firehawks. Before that I used the TM7 on the same combo;it was decent but not as good as the Performer RPM.
Ragnar in Iceland
Last edited by BadMoonRacer; 02/03/16 05:02 PM.
66 Charger, 451, .582" lift, 11" conv. 4.10:1. 4118 lbs 11.75@117 mph on regular Firestone Firehawk radials. Icelandic Champion in MC 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2022.
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: MarkZ]
#2004937
02/03/16 05:12 PM
02/03/16 05:12 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318 State of confusion
Thumperdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
|
Open plenum especially if you go to tbi as the distribution is WAY better.........
72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: MarkZ]
#2004939
02/03/16 05:18 PM
02/03/16 05:18 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 474 Alberta, Canada
451Guy
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 474
Alberta, Canada
|
I run a Street Dominator on my low deck 512. Love it!
Thanx 451 Guy
512 cu in 71 Demon Super Street Car - NO LONGER - Broke Crank Best ET 9.57 @ 139.96
451 cu in Pump Gas - 71 Demon Super Street Car Best ET 9.99 @ 136.80
512 cu in 69 Charger R/T Best ET 11.39 @ 118.11
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2005004
02/03/16 07:50 PM
02/03/16 07:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,450 Michigan
MarkZ
OP
Worthy
|
OP
Worthy
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,450
Michigan
|
The camshaft, converter, rear gear ratio carb. size and intake manifold all need to match the intended application for the motor. That being said most single plane intakes are not very responsive at or below 2500 RPM and they will make more HP and torque above 4500 than a decent dual plane intake will on the same storker motor like yours I have dyno tested several different intake combinations on 500 to 700 HP pump gas street motors and I like and use the Eddy Performer RPM on most of the normal guys motors. If they want the fastest and baddest sounding street cars then they get the M.W. heads and bigger and better single plane intakes that match the heads, cam and so on The car has 4.10 gears right now, but I'm looking forward to dropping back down to a 3.55 after the motor is installed. The converter is a tight 10" Turbo Action. Haven't decided on a cam yet. It sounds like a dual plane is what I want then. Thanks.
1987 Fifth Avenue - 512/518/D60
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: MarkZ]
#2005013
02/03/16 08:09 PM
02/03/16 08:09 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318 State of confusion
Thumperdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
|
Check out the vid posted on here about frieburgh(sp)from Hot Rod mag where they tested carbs against efi and the problems they had w/a dual plane and efi distribution..........
72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: MarkZ]
#2005068
02/03/16 09:26 PM
02/03/16 09:26 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 150 It's Complicated
HDNMOPERS
member
|
member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 150
It's Complicated
|
We are essentially doing the same build. I think I will be going with a Torker that I will have Larry Smith at HP engines port and balance the flow. I need the hood clearance is why. I will be running throttle body injection probably FI Tech unit. I may get a RPM for mock up and check hood clearance. But pretty sure it is to tall in my case.
Last edited by HDNMOPERS; 02/04/16 02:07 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: HDNMOPERS]
#2005081
02/03/16 09:48 PM
02/03/16 09:48 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664 IN
ahy
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
|
I went with the MI SP on my low deck Ed head 496. It tested well on the Hot Rod manifold comparison and I wanted best possible air distribution for EFI. A dual plane should help lower end torque... but with 512 CI you probably have more than enough already. I figured a little help at the top end was more important. It is super responsive at any RPM. It did require some tuning of the electronic "pump shot" to avoid stumble on acceleration below 2000 RPM. It will now accelerate smoothly from 1200 RPM in overdrive if that is what I want. I recently pulled it for freshen (pic). I'll post dyno results shortly. With >600 ft lb torque at 3000 RPM it does keep up with traffic OK...
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: davenc]
#2005272
02/04/16 01:51 AM
02/04/16 01:51 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318 State of confusion
Thumperdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
|
Like a week or so ago on here.............Maybe someone can bring it up.......
72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: forphorty]
#2005333
02/04/16 05:52 AM
02/04/16 05:52 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,272 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,272
Bend,OR USA
|
Lets see, a 750 CFM carb compared to a 1000 CFM throttle body, thats a fair comparision, correct Me thinks a decntly tuned 950 CFM HP carb would have made more HP and torque than the 750 CFM did on that motor and intake
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 02/04/16 05:53 AM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: Thumperdart]
#2005439
02/04/16 02:13 PM
02/04/16 02:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,450 Michigan
MarkZ
OP
Worthy
|
OP
Worthy
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,450
Michigan
|
Check out the vid posted on here about frieburgh(sp)from Hot Rod mag where they tested carbs against efi and the problems they had w/a dual plane and efi distribution.......... I would never have thought that would be an issue. So what I'm taking away from this then is I should use different manifolds and avoid a potential headache altogether. This helped me out a lot. Seeing as how I still have the 5/16 fuel lines in the car I might as well upgrade them and inject the 360 this season first. I'll pick up an M1 single for the 512. Thanks everyone.
1987 Fifth Avenue - 512/518/D60
|
|
|
Re: Low deck stroker intake?
[Re: MarkZ]
#2005474
02/04/16 03:13 PM
02/04/16 03:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,881 Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,881
Weddington, N.C.
|
Low Deck 512 with standard port heads?
Ported 383 Holley Street Dominator will IMO be best all the way around, OOTB a good toss-up between an RPM and the SD, but ported a SD will walk the dog and still fit under your hood.
But on a big cube motor AND....I had to run it out of the box I'd probably go with an old TM6 (tarantula) or the Weiand X-cellerator over the RPM, but a ported SD would still be my first choice. The M1 is about as good out of the box as the SD, but it's tall/skinny plenum runners are tougher to port, the SD is easier to work the runners and you can get better taper for good power...but opinions vary.
I'd highly recommend you send it to Larry Smith at HP Engines; I used to port the mess out of SD's and get them to flow from ~270 to ~310-315, that's plenty for 600+ hp. As a general rule if your intake port doesn't outflow your head by ~5-7%, you're leaving power on the table. Here is some of Larry's handiwork (mine could never be this pretty, lol) on a Mopar 337 on my 517 Max Wedge Low deck.
Last edited by Streetwize; 02/04/16 03:20 PM.
|
|
|
|
|