Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: 67autocross] #1978053
12/28/15 07:30 PM
12/28/15 07:30 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By 67autocross

I would say that suspension might add some weight, but I would guess at the most 50lbs over a dana 60 with leaf springs.


My guess is a whole lot more, are you forgetting the frame clip needed for the IRS?


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: Supercuda] #1978080
12/28/15 08:11 PM
12/28/15 08:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,432
NorCal
RylisPro Offline
top fuel
RylisPro  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,432
NorCal
I would think that it would add weight in the right area though as most iron block cars are what a 60/40 split front/rear?
This IRS may just make it easier for a car to be 50/50.

Too bad it takes a lot of mass off the wallet as well haha!


73 `Cuda
Instagram: @rylispro
YouTube: RylisPro
www.rylispro.com
925-214-9192
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: Supercuda] #1978126
12/28/15 09:13 PM
12/28/15 09:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,074
Manitoba Canada
67autocross Offline
super stock
67autocross  Offline
super stock

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,074
Manitoba Canada
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Originally Posted By 67autocross

I would say that suspension might add some weight, but I would guess at the most 50lbs over a dana 60 with leaf springs.


My guess is a whole lot more, are you forgetting the frame clip needed for the IRS?


I'm just guessing off the last dana 60 I moved still had the leaf springs and all the hangers, u bolts, shocks, ect attached to it. All that stuff must have weighed 300lbs, that IRS setup and associated mounting hardware can't be that much more. I could be wrong but I don't think I'm to far off.


A new iron curtain drawn across the 49th parallel
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: DeMopuar] #1978215
12/28/15 11:22 PM
12/28/15 11:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,785
Utah and Alaska
astjp2 Offline
master
astjp2  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,785
Utah and Alaska
An empty 60 housing weighs less than 70# I can ship them UPS and not pay the overweight fees


1941 Taylorcraft
1968 Charger
1994 Wrangler
1998 Wrangler
2008 Kia Rio
2017 Jetta

I didn't do 4 years and 9 months of Graduate School to be called Mister!
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: RylisPro] #1978244
12/28/15 11:46 PM
12/28/15 11:46 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By RylisPro
I would think that it would add weight in the right area though as most iron block cars are what a 60/40 split front/rear?
This IRS may just make it easier for a car to be 50/50.

Too bad it takes a lot of mass off the wallet as well haha!


Well, if adding weight to the back to get 50/50 is all that you're concerned about fill the trunk with concrete.

Yeah, I know foolish, but putting a heavy rear suspension in to accomplish the same goal is about as foolish too. Now if the heavier rear suspension markedly improved the handling and ride, and that is the question at hand for an E body here, then go for it.

But less weight generally helps handling more than increasing weight.

I don't know where y'all are finding prices and weights, but the picture I see doesn't show brakes or shocks or springs, which will add to the weight. I also don't know why one would compare it to a stock Dana 60 setup either, not what I'd choose in a handler myself. In fact one could make a very cogent argument that the 8 3/4 is a better choice to ease gear changes for different type races and lighter in weight and most like more than strong enough for a handler.

Last edited by Supercuda; 12/28/15 11:51 PM.

They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: Supercuda] #1978273
12/29/15 12:24 AM
12/29/15 12:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
I agree on all your above points on the AM IRS.


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: Supercuda] #1978304
12/29/15 12:59 AM
12/29/15 12:59 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,074
Manitoba Canada
67autocross Offline
super stock
67autocross  Offline
super stock

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,074
Manitoba Canada
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Originally Posted By RylisPro
I would think that it would add weight in the right area though as most iron block cars are what a 60/40 split front/rear?
This IRS may just make it easier for a car to be 50/50.

Too bad it takes a lot of mass off the wallet as well haha!


Well, if adding weight to the back to get 50/50 is all that you're concerned about fill the trunk with concrete.

Yeah, I know foolish, but putting a heavy rear suspension in to accomplish the same goal is about as foolish too. Now if the heavier rear suspension markedly improved the handling and ride, and that is the question at hand for an E body here, then go for it.

But less weight generally helps handling more than increasing weight.

I don't know where y'all are finding prices and weights, but the picture I see doesn't show brakes or shocks or springs, which will add to the weight. I also don't know why one would compare it to a stock Dana 60 setup either, not what I'd choose in a handler myself. In fact one could make a very cogent argument that the 8 3/4 is a better choice to ease gear changes for different type races and lighter in weight and most like more than strong enough for a handler.


I was comparing it to a Dana 60 because the Art Morrison IRS uses a Dana 60 or strange 60 centre section.
8 3/4 rear ends are great for a decent horsepower street build but I think anyone looking at this IRS would be looking at putting some big power through it, as it is rated a 1300RWHP.


A new iron curtain drawn across the 49th parallel
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: DeMopuar] #1978343
12/29/15 01:35 AM
12/29/15 01:35 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
I don't usually equate 1300 hp with a handler or enough HP to frag an 8 3/4 for that matter, at least not in this forum. A blindspot perhaps. I dunno how much dead weight this unit might save over a normal Dana, but unsprung weight I can see.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: Supercuda] #1978490
12/29/15 12:42 PM
12/29/15 12:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
Its sprung weight, and anybody that can put 1300hp to the pavement successfully in a handler is not on moparts, that is way beyond anything we can even dream about. Few if any chose an IRS for drag use, so that would not have been their market design target. A 9" or QC would have mt first choices if I was in their shoes. Strange.


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: 72Swinger] #1985692
01/07/16 06:03 PM
01/07/16 06:03 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 259
n.c.
G
geo. Offline
enthusiast
geo.  Offline
enthusiast
G

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 259
n.c.
Originally Posted By 72Swinger
It costs 12K so it must be awesome. And the 250 lbs it adds only makes the handle better to.


Couldn't have put it better myself!

Interesting how the magazines almost never tell you about weight INCREASES from the latest gadget!!

Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: DeMopuar] #1985704
01/07/16 06:19 PM
01/07/16 06:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Mountain View, CA
6
68rrunner Offline
enthusiast
68rrunner  Offline
enthusiast
6

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Mountain View, CA
Speaking to a few folks that have made the jump, from leafs to 3 link to the AM IRS; they have all said that the improved handling and stability were astronomical and that it was well worth the investment and done again, they'd skip the 3 link setup.

p.s. waiting on a text reply on chassis weight changes across the last 2 if not all 3.

Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: DeMopuar] #1985751
01/07/16 07:01 PM
01/07/16 07:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
How many of them have jumped from a Mopar rear suspension to IRS?

because comparing Ford/GM rear suspensions is moot.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: DeMopuar] #1985812
01/07/16 08:15 PM
01/07/16 08:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Mountain View, CA
6
68rrunner Offline
enthusiast
68rrunner  Offline
enthusiast
6

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Mountain View, CA
Here is the message from the horses' mouth:
"The AM its added about 40 lbs over the 3 link with floater. I don't know about leaf vs 3 link, but the 3 link has less Unsprung weight. You can feel it even driving in a parking lot! Somewhere I have the 3 link weight. I think the leaf springs are 45 lbs each, most of it Unsprung."

So long and short, 40 lbs of sprung weight all in the rear. Not a bad bit and I'm thinking with the new Alloy housings hitting the market, maybe a few more lbs could be lost.

I don't really think the difference between GM/Ford Mopar makes a whole bit of difference, as the weight differences shouldn't be too more varied that the half dozen spring and rear options we all have. Everyone is going to be a bit different from 8.25's, 8.75's and Dana's. Not to mention 3 leaf packs, 7 leaf packs, etc.

Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: 68rrunner] #1985916
01/07/16 11:09 PM
01/07/16 11:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
I think he was suggesting the geometry of the mopar leaf system is better to begin with when compared to GM/Ford, not any weight issues. Furthermore, I suspect dialing in/adjustments with an IRS vs a 3 link, would find the 3 link much more adaptable. IRS IMO would shine best with unfortunately the more complicated and heat sensitive inboard brake set-up, not offered yet, as I can see. I would also guess some of the AM IRS weight gain could be mitigated because it is first a somewhat universal design, and therefore needs beef to be a solution for all, but I might be wrong.


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: DeMopuar] #1985964
01/08/16 12:13 AM
01/08/16 12:13 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
yes. the geometry.

If your source is comparing the handling of a GM/Ford coil sprung 4 link setup then yeah I can see why they are impressed.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: DeMopuar] #1986076
01/08/16 02:43 AM
01/08/16 02:43 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,328
St. Louis, MO
mopardamo Offline
pro stock
mopardamo  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,328
St. Louis, MO
We also have to consider anyone spending big bucks on this type of setup will automatically say how great is is (smart they were). Bucks = happiness for many. We all work hard for our bucks. Now if an actual heavy hitter racer who had driven different setups in the same car would say WOW! what a setup, then it really holds some weight for me. So many times I see the average hot rodder wanna be say good things about their new toy. The more expensive the more they overstate. Just human reaction for many. I get it.

Bought a set of Fox 2.0 shocks with the resivours for my 2006 Ram 4x4 diesel. Hundreds of positive things on the net about ride improvements on road. Just installed them. The ride is super stiff. The tire leaves the road on small sharp bumps and sometimes the truck moves sideways. Scary. I have to pay attention at all times just in case. Great more stress in life:-( Can't wait to take them off and send them back.

NOT saying this is one of those things but i'm in my skeptical corner.

Damon

Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: DeMopuar] #1986090
01/08/16 03:02 AM
01/08/16 03:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
72Swinger Offline
master
72Swinger  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
Who valved those Fox's?


Mopar to the bone!!!
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: DeMopuar] #1986093
01/08/16 03:04 AM
01/08/16 03:04 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,328
St. Louis, MO
mopardamo Offline
pro stock
mopardamo  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,328
St. Louis, MO
Supposedly custom for Thuren.

Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: mopardamo] #1986104
01/08/16 03:28 AM
01/08/16 03:28 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,074
Manitoba Canada
67autocross Offline
super stock
67autocross  Offline
super stock

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,074
Manitoba Canada
Originally Posted By mopardamo
We also have to consider anyone spending big bucks on this type of setup will automatically say how great is is (smart they were). Bucks = happiness for many. We all work hard for our bucks. Now if an actual heavy hitter racer who had driven different setups in the same car would say WOW! what a setup, then it really holds some weight for me. So many times I see the average hot rodder wanna be say good things about their new toy. The more expensive the more they overstate. Just human reaction for many. I get it.

Bought a set of Fox 2.0 shocks with the resivours for my 2006 Ram 4x4 diesel. Hundreds of positive things on the net about ride improvements on road. Just installed them. The ride is super stiff. The tire leaves the road on small sharp bumps and sometimes the truck moves sideways. Scary. I have to pay attention at all times just in case. Great more stress in life:-( Can't wait to take them off and send them back.

NOT saying this is one of those things but i'm in my skeptical corner.

Damon


Let some nitogen out of them.


A new iron curtain drawn across the 49th parallel
Re: Cuda Art Morrison Multilink Independent Rear Suspension?? [Re: mopardamo] #1986105
01/08/16 03:33 AM
01/08/16 03:33 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
72Swinger Offline
master
72Swinger  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
Originally Posted By mopardamo
Supposedly custom for Thuren.
Did you couple those with his coils? If not email him and tell him they suck, and let him make it right.


Mopar to the bone!!!
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1