Re: Challenger inner fender wells....remove?
[Re: 590 Challenger]
#2010316
02/12/16 01:56 AM
02/12/16 01:56 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,096 Australia
ozymaxwedge
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,096
Australia
|
I agree, I cant see the benefit of the hoop over the tank ? Is it there for a reason ? That is a big lump of horse power you have there ![smile smile](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/smile.gif) there is a stack of weight in a blower and hat isn't there ? I had a 8/71 with bird hat, nearly crapped my pants lifting on and off ![smile smile](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/smile.gif)
1963 Plymouth Max Wedge 1971 Barracuda
|
|
|
Re: Challenger inner fender wells....remove?
[Re: 590 Challenger]
#2010331
02/12/16 02:20 AM
02/12/16 02:20 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257 gulfport, ms, west mi
rowin4
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
|
Isn't there something in the rule book on protecting the fuel cell? Seem to remember a old friend of mine had to ad some tubing around his front mounted fuel cell to be in compliance .
it's ok to butt heads, just don't do it with a butthead
|
|
|
Re: Challenger inner fender wells....remove?
[Re: 590 Challenger]
#2024923
03/05/16 11:32 AM
03/05/16 11:32 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,213 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,213
New York
|
a single 1 5/8 moly bar is much more solid then the factory frame rail
How do you figure that?
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: Challenger inner fender wells....remove?
[Re: 590 Challenger]
#2025911
03/06/16 08:02 PM
03/06/16 08:02 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
On a high HP car, the mid plate area NEEDS to be an integral part of the chassis or you will have problems. This is still just kind of "hanging out there" and has no side to side support. Those bars coming off the upper strut bars should have been ONE bar that was bent to cross top of trans and then up to other snout bar and THEN tied in to rest of chassis. Plus the mid plate is just mounted on a piece of angle hanging in the breeze off the tubing.
The TWO tubes for the shock support serves no purpose. One would have been plenty. Not trying to be critical here and I applaud anyone who takes on a project like this themselves, but some thought as to what something DOES and what you NEED it to do, needs to be taken into account before you just start welding tubing in where it LOOKS like it needs something.
At this point, car has had a lot of tubing added that doesn't DO anything.
With a "stock firewall" rule, you could have bent the loop the way I referenced, then placed that loop back against firewall or even notched and made it "part" of firewall. Some bracing would have then had mid plate basically boxed and "part" of factory firewall and structure. You could then have moved motor back a touch.
Last edited by Monte_Smith; 03/06/16 08:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
|