Re: Trick Flow heads
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#1957551
11/25/15 06:34 AM
11/25/15 06:34 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 234 Brisvegas, Australia
Alchemi
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 234
Brisvegas, Australia
|
So apart from valve shrouding, has anyone seen any reason no to put these on a 4.280 bore? if the lift is kept under .600 it should be all good? I mentioned this in a prev thread and the guy from trickflow came back with it would fit, but they just speced the larger bore size because of the 2.19 inlet valve... no other tech explanation other than "because"... them being 10% off at summit atm is a deal clincher for me, will have to see if i can generate the coin b4 they go off special though, 5 days argh (and if they have any left!) Edit: ahh (expletive) it, Im going to blow something up in the trans or the diff if i do use these guys, too much power, too much compression, too much stall needed. Im going to stick with the sidewinders, 500 ish hp is enough for my build/budget. Still would like some opinions on the idea though
|
|
|
Re: Trick Flow heads
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#1957600
11/25/15 10:28 AM
11/25/15 10:28 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 743 Southern Alberta
Uberpube
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 743
Southern Alberta
|
Is the Chamber to small to use on a older build with l2266 pistons 30 over 440? I had the deck cut .040, IIRC they were down the hole .060 or .070. It has ported and shaved 452's on it right now, cam is a PAW 224 grind.
Last edited by Uberpube; 11/25/15 10:31 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Trick Flow heads
[Re: Alchemi]
#1957603
11/25/15 10:33 AM
11/25/15 10:33 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 559 Idaho
LaRoy Engines
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 559
Idaho
|
So apart from valve shrouding, has anyone seen any reason no to put these on a 4.280 bore? if the lift is kept under .600 it should be all good? I mentioned this in a prev thread and the guy from trickflow came back with it would fit, but they just speced the larger bore size because of the 2.19 inlet valve... no other tech explanation other than "because"... them being 10% off at summit atm is a deal clincher for me, will have to see if i can generate the coin b4 they go off special though, 5 days argh (and if they have any left!) Edit: ahh (expletive) it, Im going to blow something up in the trans or the diff if i do use these guys, too much power, too much compression, too much stall needed. Im going to stick with the sidewinders, 500 ish hp is enough for my build/budget. Still would like some opinions on the idea though I put them on a 4.250 bore with a .039" gasket and the intake valve hit the cylinder wall at .770" lift. On the exhaust valve the retainer hit the seal at .850" and hadn't struck the cylinder wall.
|
|
|
Re: Trick Flow heads
[Re: AndyF]
#1958115
11/26/15 01:59 AM
11/26/15 01:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 126 Oregon
Jamie McGrath
member
|
member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 126
Oregon
|
We ended up honing the valve guides slightly to provide "racing clearance". The valve clearance was "pass car" tight right out of the box. Everything else looked good. We swapped out the Ti retainers for some steel retainers. The steel retainers are only $45 and they won't get chewed up by the damper. I'm pretty sure the engine will still spin 7000 rpm with the steel retainers so no need for the lighter weight components. If we run into a float issue then I'll install some tool steel retainers.
Engine is ready to fire up. Should have some data after T-day. Baro is 30.15 and outside temp is 45 degrees so we're looking at some good air density numbers for dyno testing. Uncorrected numbers should be really nice. Just in case I missed it what is the rest of engine combo?
|
|
|
Re: Trick Flow heads
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#1958335
11/26/15 01:00 PM
11/26/15 01:00 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,447 Md.
carnut68
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,447
Md.
|
With the heart shaped chamber,will a .140 Ross dome piston work? .014 in the hole .027 headgasket 4.350 bore.
America First!
|
|
|
|
|