Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1932867
10/15/15 10:52 PM
10/15/15 10:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
T
TRENDZ Offline
master
TRENDZ  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
Ok. Now do the same test, except increase the water pressure to the house,and don't create a restriction with your finger.


"use it 'till it breaks, replace as needed"
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: madscientist] #1932868
10/15/15 10:53 PM
10/15/15 10:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,532
off the grid
340B5 Offline
pro stock
340B5  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,532
off the grid
Originally Posted By madscientist
You can have pressure and ZERO flow. That is why if I have to use a .500 fuel line I want the pressure to the regulator to be 30 pounds or more. A bigger fuel line has more fuel in it, thus more weight. So if you don't raise the line pressure you can have pressure but zero flow. Seen it a bunch of times.

That said, most of the time it shows up in 60 feet.


I know what you meant and you're right. More fuel mass in the line has more inertia so it has more of a tendency to stay put during launch, hence the need for more pressure to move it forward.


Yeah, it's got a smallblock.
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1932874
10/15/15 11:01 PM
10/15/15 11:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
T
TRENDZ Offline
master
TRENDZ  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
Where are you reading the fuel pressure? If you have a regulated pump at the rear, you should still be regulating at the carb, and monitoring pressure there.
You can have pressure and zero flow if reading at the rear, but if you are in a dynamic state(float allowing flow) and you have pressure at the carb inlet you WILL have flow.


"use it 'till it breaks, replace as needed"
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1932880
10/15/15 11:05 PM
10/15/15 11:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 525
Can , Nova Scotia , Cape Breto...
C
caper Offline
mopar
caper  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 525
Can , Nova Scotia , Cape Breto...
You would have more water pressure, but not necessary more flow. The pump will only put out much flow as it is designed to put out at a certain RPM, and the pump puts its most flow out when there is no restriction.
You could increase the voltage (16 volts)to the pump to get it to spin higher and maybe put out more flow.

Last edited by caper; 10/15/15 11:06 PM.

New best 10.18 , 1.40 60 ft 496 Scott Brown built, street driven 3600 lbs,654 hp , 653 ft tq
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: caper] #1932882
10/15/15 11:11 PM
10/15/15 11:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,225
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,225
Bend,OR USA
Originally Posted By caper
Experiment

Go to your kitchen sink, open up the cold water facet, put a gallon jug under it and time how long it takes to fill the jug.
Now put your finger on the head of your facet to cause a restriction (pressure). Time how long it takes to fill the jug up. It will take much longer.

It may take pressure to unseat the needle from the seat on a Holley carb. But what about a old Carter carb. The floats drop pulling the needle of the seat allowing the bowls to fill quite quickly.
The original Carter AFB carbs didn't come with that device to pull the floats down, niether did any of the early Carter carbs, 1,2 or 4 barrel WCFBs. I'm not sure exactly when I started seeing those in Carter carb. kits or in the after market over the counter Hi Po AFB and AVS carbs confused As far as restricting fuel flow I did a test before and after on my old pump gas car with the six pak and the Magnafuel 275 pump and then replaced that pump with a Magnafuel 300 pump. It took the exact same time in seconds to fill a 2.5 gallon jug with all three #6AN fuel lines dumping into that jug shock I called Magnafuel to complain and they said try using a rstrictor in the lines like the needles and seats are so that would load the pump like the real world, I hooked one line back up to the rear carb and redid the test with the 300 pump on that car, it filled that 2.5 gallon jug up a lot quicker threw(SP?) two lines flowing into it than it did with all three lines free flowing into it shock No other changes either shruggy


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1932886
10/15/15 11:19 PM
10/15/15 11:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
T
TRENDZ Offline
master
TRENDZ  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
listen to thumper.
you can run lower pressure with a larger/better bowl /needle/ seat. A stock holley needle seat/ bowl will not flow enough to keep up with the jets on most engines with a gravity feed under sustained load.


"use it 'till it breaks, replace as needed"
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1932897
10/15/15 11:30 PM
10/15/15 11:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 525
Can , Nova Scotia , Cape Breto...
C
caper Offline
mopar
caper  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 525
Can , Nova Scotia , Cape Breto...
If I understand what Thumper is saying is that there is an added restriction to the flow of fuel through the needle and seat and the bowls. He removes the restriction by putting in a bigger needle seat and better designed bowl. Lowering the pressure, allowing more fuel to enter the bowl.


New best 10.18 , 1.40 60 ft 496 Scott Brown built, street driven 3600 lbs,654 hp , 653 ft tq
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: Thumperdart] #1932935
10/16/15 12:08 AM
10/16/15 12:08 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,532
off the grid
340B5 Offline
pro stock
340B5  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,532
off the grid
Originally Posted By Thumperdart
I have ran pretty well w/a smallish holley 150 but stepped up to the 300 Magnafuel and the second half of the time slip came around. Volume and pressure are two different deals and the big pumps return right back into the cell/tank to keep em cool and the pre-set pressures are 28+ lbs. for a reason. I run .130 n&s`s in Dominators and .120`s in 4150`s w/great results and lower pressures combined w/Quickfuel whale mouth(My terms)entrance fuel bowls keep aeration under control. Just look at your stock bowls and check out the "wall"the fuel hits before entering the bowl......not good.


Which Quickfuel bowls are you referring to? I'm looking for something better than my stock Holley bowls that won't break the bank.


Yeah, it's got a smallblock.
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: caper] #1932948
10/16/15 12:22 AM
10/16/15 12:22 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,696
jersey
S
Spaceman Spiff Offline
master
Spaceman Spiff  Offline
master
S

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,696
jersey
Originally Posted By caper
I would say that the 3.5# pressure was enough pressure to keep enough flow up to fill your bowls in your carb, and also enough to overcome your G forces. A carb does not work on pressure, it works flow of fuel. You can have all the pressure in the world if you don't have flow you have no fuel for your engine.

EX. Lets say your car used just less than a gallon of gas to run the 1/4 mile. You mount a gallon can on top of the engine hood just over the top of the carb. You hook a hose to your carb. The fuel would be gravity feed to the carb bowls, no pressure. The car would run the 1/4 mile with no problem. No fuel pump.
Don't try this at home. LOL


GRAVITY is creating pressure.
Put that fuel jug on the frame rail and see what happens.


526 cubes of angry wedge, pushbutton shifted, 9 passenger killer!
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: 340B5] #1933023
10/16/15 02:16 AM
10/16/15 02:16 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Originally Posted By 340B5
Originally Posted By Thumperdart
I have ran pretty well w/a smallish holley 150 but stepped up to the 300 Magnafuel and the second half of the time slip came around. Volume and pressure are two different deals and the big pumps return right back into the cell/tank to keep em cool and the pre-set pressures are 28+ lbs. for a reason. I run .130 n&s`s in Dominators and .120`s in 4150`s w/great results and lower pressures combined w/Quickfuel whale mouth(My terms)entrance fuel bowls keep aeration under control. Just look at your stock bowls and check out the "wall"the fuel hits before entering the bowl......not good.


Which Quickfuel bowls are you referring to? I'm looking for something better than my stock Holley bowls that won't break the bank.


Dont have part #`s in ft. of me but it`s a kit that Quickfuel sells for around $105 and comes w/new bolts, nylon washers and gaskets and I try to talk every customer into using em if I can. Just one look at a stock Holley bowl and even the "high end" stuff and you`ll see the wall fuel hits THEN get yer hands on the mentioned bowls, and you will never run a stock one again.........There`s more "science" in carbs than most people think.........

Last edited by Thumperdart; 10/16/15 02:39 AM.

72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1933079
10/16/15 08:48 AM
10/16/15 08:48 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
poboyengineering Offline
mopar
poboyengineering  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
Thumper, is this it? 34-100, comes with aluminum fuel bowls?
It's on their website at $101 and change.........


It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.

Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: poboyengineering] #1933099
10/16/15 10:13 AM
10/16/15 10:13 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,840
NW Indiana
F
fbs63 Offline
top fuel
fbs63  Offline
top fuel
F

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,840
NW Indiana
I have always understood this to be a basic rule in hydraulics. Increasing pressure reduces volume and vice versa. This only remains true while keeping the same orifice.

Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1933106
10/16/15 10:31 AM
10/16/15 10:31 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 984
San Diego CA
6
65 Hemi Offline
super stock
65 Hemi  Offline
super stock
6

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 984
San Diego CA
In our old TS car we would only run 4.75-5 psi with big needle and seat. You don't want to high of pressure because it can get air in the fuel and/or when your floats let fuel in you don't want the fuel on top of the float weighing the float down.


Doug

MOPAR or NO CAR!!!
1965 Dodge Coronet soon a 6.1 Hemi with a Magnson blower 810 hp on pump gas
1964 Dodge Polara 582" Indy alum Block 426-1RA heads,
1933 Plymouth PE all Steel, LT1 4L60E
1959 Plymouth Savoy 33,000 mile survivor
Old cars are never done. They are ongoing projects!
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1933114
10/16/15 10:51 AM
10/16/15 10:51 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,128
sweden
S
sshemi Offline
top fuel
sshemi  Offline
top fuel
S

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,128
sweden
Only way to increase pressure is to choke more witch also reduces flow.
Simple laws of physics.

Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: fbs63] #1933130
10/16/15 11:25 AM
10/16/15 11:25 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 715
Central TEXAS!!!!
sr4440 Offline
super stock
sr4440  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 715
Central TEXAS!!!!
Originally Posted By fbs63
I have always understood this to be a basic rule in hydraulics. Increasing pressure reduces volume and vice versa. This only remains true while keeping the same orifice.


Doesn't work that way with mechcanical fuel injection. to flow 200 lb/hr takes 20 psi; to flow 400 lb/hr takes 80 psi, so
to get twice the flow takes four times the pressure. Why? If we want to flow twice as much through a fixed hole size, we will have to push twice as many fuel particles through it at twice the velocity, so we will have to do 2 x 2 or 4 times the work. We use the pressure to do this work.

If you want to flow more through an orifice, but keep the pressure the same, then you must use a larger orifice. The flow increases as the area of the orifice increases. Since the area is Pi x diameter squared / 4, the area increases as the square of the diameter, so twice the diameter is four times the area.

Joe


Without Data, you’re just another guy with an opinion.
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: poboyengineering] #1933148
10/16/15 12:03 PM
10/16/15 12:03 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Originally Posted By poboyengineering
Thumper, is this it? 34-100, comes with aluminum fuel bowls?
It's on their website at $101 and change.........


YES........


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1933164
10/16/15 12:15 PM
10/16/15 12:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
I need to pull one of the bowls off my QF 750 and one off my Biggs 950HP and compare them. Thanks for the info Thumper.

Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: justinp61] #1933167
10/16/15 12:17 PM
10/16/15 12:17 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Originally Posted By justinp61
I need to pull one of the bowls off my QF 750 and one off my Biggs 950HP and compare them. Thanks for the info Thumper.


Post a pic if you can of the fuel entrance for all to see....... thumbs


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1933207
10/16/15 01:43 PM
10/16/15 01:43 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319
Puyallup, WA
S
StealthWedge67 Offline
master
StealthWedge67  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319
Puyallup, WA
It seems to me that if you have pressure at (just before) the carb, then you have what you need to keep it full. Pressure should only be created from the needle / seat restricting what enters the bowl, based on how much it takes to keep the floats in the correct position. I like the inclusion of the bowl design and needle & seat in this discussion because ultimately it may be more important than the pump. Its the damn, whereas the pump is the river.

I only make a little over 500hp, but FWIW: I run dominator style bowls and .120 needles & seats at both ends of my 830 DP. Some would say overkill, but I think it helps keep the floats in the right position. I monitor pressure right at the carb, and generally I see 6psi @ general running conditions, and it drops to a steady 3.5psi through a run. I run a Carter 110 mechanical pump and stock 5/16 line to the pump, 3/8" from the pump to the carb.

Notable: this past year I had a couple of runs on a real hot day where I watched the fuel pressure guage drop to 0 halfway through the run. I waited for the car to nose over, but it never happened. car ran right on its best MPH on those runs. All I can take from that is that even with 0 pressure, if you have a good flowing system within the fuel bowl, you're probably still okay. (???)


LemonWedge - Street heavy / Strip ready - 11.07 @ 120
Re: Fuel Volume vs. Fuel Pressure [Re: tboomer] #1933244
10/16/15 02:51 PM
10/16/15 02:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,718
Portage,michigan
B
B3422W5 Offline
I Live Here
B3422W5  Offline
I Live Here
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,718
Portage,michigan
I ran much quicker and faster than the OP at probably as much weight(3350) with a deadheaded Holley Black.
Upgraded the entire system and picked up absolutely zero anywhere.
Save your money Ted for something else.
ETA....... Insuring good and constant adequate voltage at the pump is very important, and overlooked

Last edited by B3422W5; 10/16/15 02:57 PM.

69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight
418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam
Best so far, 10.40 @127 1/4
1.41 best 60 foot
6.60 at 103.90 1/8

Page 2 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1