Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 9 10
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: madscientist] #1856134
06/24/15 08:05 PM
06/24/15 08:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
C
camastomcat Offline
top fuel
camastomcat  Offline
top fuel
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
The fastest engines I've had built were built by a guy that runs GM stuff. He doesn't run it because he likes it necessarily, he runs it because it's fast and cheaper than Mopar stuff, and he builds a lot of the Mopars too. Oh, and he know's they're all just air pumps!

Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: AndyF] #1856142
06/24/15 08:32 PM
06/24/15 08:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,928
A shed in England
Tig Offline
master
Tig  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,928
A shed in England
Originally Posted By AndyF
A 1000 hp pump gas engine is an R&D project, especially a Mopar wedge one. You might be able to find a few engine builders who build BB Chevy based pump gas engines that make 1000 hp, but I doubt that there are very many (if any) Mopar (NA) wedge engines that make 1000 hp on pump gas.

I wouldn't attempt to build a 1000 hp pump gas Mopar wedge myself and I've been designing and building Mopar bb wedge motors for over 30 years. I'm surprised it only cost you $22K. My 514 dyno mule makes 930 hp with 15:1 compression and cost more than $25K. Making more horsepower with less compression on a smaller budget is hard to imagine.

If someone asked me to build them a NA Mopar wedge that made 1000 hp on pump gas I'd ask them for $30K down payment and tell them to call back in a year to see how close I was. I'm not sure it is even possible since you would need something on the order of 600 inches that make 1.7 hp/inch. It isn't easy to make 1.7 hp/inch on pump gas in a big engine. 1.7 hp/inch for a 440 is 750 hp. Not very many 750 hp 440 pump gas engines running around.

I'm building a pump gas 470 engine at the moment using some really good parts and I'm shooting for 675 hp or 1.44 hp/inch. I just can't see a reasonable way to get to 1.7 hp/inch with pump gas.


https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/1622793/1.html
up


'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials.
9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge.
RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: steve660] #1856148
06/24/15 08:45 PM
06/24/15 08:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,928
A shed in England
Tig Offline
master
Tig  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,928
A shed in England
Top of the mountain


'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials.
9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge.
RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: steve660] #1856166
06/24/15 09:26 PM
06/24/15 09:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
D
dizuster Offline
master
dizuster  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
Since when do customers pay for someone else's R&D?

Either a shop can deliver what's promised at a agreed price, or they can't.

Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: steve660] #1856173
06/24/15 09:38 PM
06/24/15 09:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880
-
R
RSNOMO Offline
Moparts Torchbearer
RSNOMO  Offline
Moparts Torchbearer
R

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880
-
Ask Dave Dudek, or Charlie Westcott about 'nuances'...



Choose wisely, your next 'builder', grasshopper...

Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: RSNOMO] #1856224
06/24/15 10:26 PM
06/24/15 10:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
C
camastomcat Offline
top fuel
camastomcat  Offline
top fuel
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
I agree with Tig. Todd@ Marsh performance is as honest as they come and builds nice stuff.

Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: steve660] #1856379
06/25/15 02:01 AM
06/25/15 02:01 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,145
Arizona, USA
gsmopar Offline
super stock
gsmopar  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,145
Arizona, USA
Isn't Mike from MM on this board?

Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: steve660] #1856402
06/25/15 02:58 AM
06/25/15 02:58 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,201
aZLiViN
J
J_BODY Offline
I Live Here
J_BODY  Offline
I Live Here
J

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,201
aZLiViN
he was.... hasn't posted since 11-14

Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: dizuster] #1856475
06/25/15 10:21 AM
06/25/15 10:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,376
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,376
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Originally Posted By dizuster
Since when do customers pay for someone else's R&D?

Either a shop can deliver what's promised at a agreed price, or they can't.


iagree iagree


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1856485
06/25/15 10:58 AM
06/25/15 10:58 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 456
corpus christi tex
C
Cheatham Offline
mopar
Cheatham  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 456
corpus christi tex
Originally Posted By MR_P_BODY
Originally Posted By B3422W5
I see where Scott Brown built a 496 pump gas Hemi 6 or 7 years ago that made 851 horse
1.71


Was that on a dyno or track proven numbers... I dont have a
lot of faith in dyos lately.. I would really doubt that the
OP engine made 1004 hp on MM dyno... we have seen other engines
that came off that dyno and the numbers were NO WHERE NEAR what
the track showed
wave
In 1978 my dad bought a Prototype Racing engine 331ci for his circle track car that was dyno @ 585 HP @ 8500rpm, car was fast, now today the same size engines are going the same speeds and times around the track but are claiming the engines are making 750-800 + HP lol

Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: Cheatham] #1856493
06/25/15 11:09 AM
06/25/15 11:09 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
Thanks streetwize...


PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: steve660] #1856497
06/25/15 11:14 AM
06/25/15 11:14 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
I dont consider this engine an R&D experiment. They offer a pumpgas 622 with Brodix heads on their site. They also have a story on their site about building a set of PSO heads for a customer with a dragster. So they have built engines using World blocks. They have built pumpgas 622's. They have built PSO heads.


PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: dizuster] #1856509
06/25/15 11:44 AM
06/25/15 11:44 AM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By dizuster
Since when do customers pay for someone else's R&D?

Either a shop can deliver what's promised at a agreed price, or they can't.



Happens all the time. When I learn new thing I incorporate them into the next opportunity I have. If that didn't happen, we'd all still be doing 3 angle valve jobs with a stone (for just one small example).

Economics 101: the CUSTOMERS pays it all, no matter what. Taxes go up, the customer eats it. Costs go up, the customer eats it. R&D time is no different either.

And, not to bash the OP here (because that is NOT my intent) we do not know how many times a customer changes his mind during a build. Some of the most costly engines I have done have been a customer who is like a fart in a skillet. Constantly going on the web, getting the new trick of the week part or procedure and wanting to change something in mid stream. That costs big money and lots of time.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: madscientist] #1856514
06/25/15 11:53 AM
06/25/15 11:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,722
Portage,michigan
B
B3422W5 Offline
I Live Here
B3422W5  Offline
I Live Here
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,722
Portage,michigan
Originally Posted By madscientist
Originally Posted By dizuster
Since when do customers pay for someone else's R&D?

Either a shop can deliver what's promised at a agreed price, or they can't.



Happens all the time. When I learn new thing I incorporate them into the next opportunity I have. If that didn't happen, we'd all still be doing 3 angle valve jobs with a stone (for just one small example).

Economics 101: the CUSTOMERS pays it all, no matter what. Taxes go up, the customer eats it. Costs go up, the customer eats it. R&D time is no different either.

And, not to bash the OP here (because that is NOT my intent) we do not know how many times a customer changes his mind during a build. Some of the most costly engines I have done have been a customer who is like a fart in a skillet. Constantly going on the web, getting the new trick of the week part or procedure and wanting to change something in mid stream. That costs big money and lots of time.





That's all well and good. But it has nothing to do with the machining errors and lack of attention to detail assembling the engine. No matter the engine, paying a professional should result in professional results. Not backyard mistakes


69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight
418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam
Best so far, low 10.30’s 1/4
1.41 best 60 foot
6.56 at 104.17



Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: B3422W5] #1856518
06/25/15 11:57 AM
06/25/15 11:57 AM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By B3422W5
Originally Posted By madscientist
Originally Posted By dizuster
Since when do customers pay for someone else's R&D?

Either a shop can deliver what's promised at a agreed price, or they can't.



Happens all the time. When I learn new thing I incorporate them into the next opportunity I have. If that didn't happen, we'd all still be doing 3 angle valve jobs with a stone (for just one small example).

Economics 101: the CUSTOMERS pays it all, no matter what. Taxes go up, the customer eats it. Costs go up, the customer eats it. R&D time is no different either.

And, not to bash the OP here (because that is NOT my intent) we do not know how many times a customer changes his mind during a build. Some of the most costly engines I have done have been a customer who is like a fart in a skillet. Constantly going on the web, getting the new trick of the week part or procedure and wanting to change something in mid stream. That costs big money and lots of time.





That's all well and good. But it has nothing to do with the machining errors and lack of attention to detail assembling the engine. No matter the engine, paying a professional should result in professional results. Not backyard mistakes


I 100% agree and did, infact, post that very same thing several posts ago.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: madscientist] #1856519
06/25/15 11:58 AM
06/25/15 11:58 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
Originally Posted By madscientist
Originally Posted By dizuster
Since when do customers pay for someone else's R&D?

Either a shop can deliver what's promised at a agreed price, or they can't.



Happens all the time. When I learn new thing I incorporate them into the next opportunity I have. If that didn't happen, we'd all still be doing 3 angle valve jobs with a stone (for just one small example).

Economics 101: the CUSTOMERS pays it all, no matter what. Taxes go up, the customer eats it. Costs go up, the customer eats it. R&D time is no different either.

And, not to bash the OP here (because that is NOT my intent) we do not know how many times a customer changes his mind during a build. Some of the most costly engines I have done have been a customer who is like a fart in a skillet. Constantly going on the web, getting the new trick of the week part or procedure and wanting to change something in mid stream. That costs big money and lots of time.


Nothing was changed or added to the build. ...Wait a minute. I did ask for a vacuum pump fitting be put on drivers side valve cover.


PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: steve660] #1856521
06/25/15 11:59 AM
06/25/15 11:59 AM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By steve660
Originally Posted By madscientist
Originally Posted By dizuster
Since when do customers pay for someone else's R&D?

Either a shop can deliver what's promised at a agreed price, or they can't.



Happens all the time. When I learn new thing I incorporate them into the next opportunity I have. If that didn't happen, we'd all still be doing 3 angle valve jobs with a stone (for just one small example).

Economics 101: the CUSTOMERS pays it all, no matter what. Taxes go up, the customer eats it. Costs go up, the customer eats it. R&D time is no different either.

And, not to bash the OP here (because that is NOT my intent) we do not know how many times a customer changes his mind during a build. Some of the most costly engines I have done have been a customer who is like a fart in a skillet. Constantly going on the web, getting the new trick of the week part or procedure and wanting to change something in mid stream. That costs big money and lots of time.


Nothing was changed or added to the build. ...Wait a minute. I did ask for a vacuum pump fitting be put on drivers side valve cover.


Just for fun...was the vaccuum pump included in the original discussions or did the pump come in later.

Not doing anything but trying to get background information.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: steve660] #1856534
06/25/15 12:17 PM
06/25/15 12:17 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
M
Monte_Smith Offline
master
Monte_Smith  Offline
master
M

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
Personally, I think MOPAR guys believing that a MOPAR shop HAS to build, or knows more about MOPAR motors, is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard. Sorry to sound harsh, but a motor is simply an air pump and that does NOT change based on what the valve covers say it is. All the MOPARs has "nuances" stuff is a bunch of crap. Power is power and you know how to make it or you don't. Proper machining is proper machining and you can do it or you can't. Period, end of story.

Wescott is a prime example. LONG time Chevy guy and was immediately a top player with a HEMI. Why, because he KNOWS how to make power and how the pump works.

And look at it this way, if your primary business is wedge Mopars, lets face it, you have been exposed to NO cutting edge stuff in years. So what have you learned about making power. On the other hand, if you build EVERYTHING, you see what is out there and what works. Then you try and apply what you learn to other makes.MM works on everything by the way

And dyno numbers are just that, numbers. Correction factors can be incorporated to make that sheet say whatever you want it to. I am with Andy...........a 1000hp, pump gas, Mopar wedge.......that's a TALL order. And guys can claim they have whatever, but me personally, have NEVER seen one of these "1000 hp pump gas" deals perform like that is what it has for power. MPH doesn't lie........dyno sheets do

And no way I would "part the motor out".........you will get .25 cents on the dollar that way. Probably a simple fix. Set it aside until you can have someone look at it

Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: madscientist] #1856538
06/25/15 12:24 PM
06/25/15 12:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
Originally Posted By madscientist
Originally Posted By steve660
Originally Posted By madscientist
Originally Posted By dizuster
Since when do customers pay for someone else's R&D?

Either a shop can deliver what's promised at a agreed price, or they can't.



Happens all the time. When I learn new thing I incorporate them into the next opportunity I have. If that didn't happen, we'd all still be doing 3 angle valve jobs with a stone (for just one small example).

Economics 101: the CUSTOMERS pays it all, no matter what. Taxes go up, the customer eats it. Costs go up, the customer eats it. R&D time is no different either.

And, not to bash the OP here (because that is NOT my intent) we do not know how many times a customer changes his mind during a build. Some of the most costly engines I have done have been a customer who is like a fart in a skillet. Constantly going on the web, getting the new trick of the week part or procedure and wanting to change something in mid stream. That costs big money and lots of time.


Nothing was changed or added to the build. ...Wait a minute. I did ask for a vacuum pump fitting be put on drivers side valve cover.


Just for fun...was the vaccuum pump included in the original discussions or did the pump come in later.

Not doing anything but trying to get background information.

Yes it was included in original discussion. It was my fault for not telling them which valve cover i needed it on. ...They charged me an extra $150 to weld it in too.


PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: MUSCLE MOTORS 30 MIN ENGINE [Re: Monte_Smith] #1856648
06/25/15 02:18 PM
06/25/15 02:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By Monte_Smith
Personally, I think MOPAR guys believing that a MOPAR shop HAS to build, or knows more about MOPAR motors, is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard. Sorry to sound harsh, but a motor is simply an air pump and that does NOT change based on what the valve covers say it is. All the MOPARs has "nuances" stuff is a bunch of crap. Power is power and you know how to make it or you don't. Proper machining is proper machining and you can do it or you can't. Period, end of story.

Wescott is a prime example. LONG time Chevy guy and was immediately a top player with a HEMI. Why, because he KNOWS how to make power and how the pump works.

And look at it this way, if your primary business is wedge Mopars, lets face it, you have been exposed to NO cutting edge stuff in years. So what have you learned about making power. On the other hand, if you build EVERYTHING, you see what is out there and what works. Then you try and apply what you learn to other makes.

And dyno numbers are just that, numbers. Correction factors can be incorporated to make that sheet say whatever you want it to. I am with Andy...........a 1000hp, pump gas, Mopar wedge.......that's a TALL order. And guys can claim they have whatever, but me personally, have NEVER seen one of these "1000 hp pump gas" deals perform like that is what it has for power. MPH doesn't lie........dyno sheets do

And no way I would "part the motor out".........you will get .25 cents on the dollar that way. Probably a simple fix. Set it aside until you can have someone look at it


You are probably correct on the simple fix thing Monte, I just threw the 10k number out there because evidently, the OP says the whole thing is [censored] and needs to be fixed. So I ASSume the cam is wrong, all the machining needs corrected and things like that.

The OP will most certainly make it WAY more painful parting it out.

I am going to ask my engine if it knows what brand it is. If it does, I guess I need to find a MoPar guru to finish it because I'm not a qualified MoPar expert.

BTW, it is an impossiblibilty for a dyno to lie. Dyno's do not lie. Flow benches do not lie. It is the CROOKS that run them who lie. I HATE liars.

There is NO EXCUSE in this day and age why you can't get on the phone and learn enough to know that a 1k PG MoPar is a damn big cat to skin. And, while your bullet is on the pump, the customer SHOULD be standing there watching and learning. And ask every question that comes to mind. If the question is not answered to your satisfaction, ask it again. If the builder can't answer it, you can figure you are getting a big ten inch (lie).


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Page 3 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 9 10






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1