|
|
|
Re: a-body console question
[Re: mopar346]
#1762267
02/26/15 01:30 AM
02/26/15 01:30 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,141
tennessee,usa
mattsmopars
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,141
tennessee,usa
|
Quote:
[quoteif you would have read my post you would have saw that I said I got it I.E. the console from a friend whom had it in his 70 duster for 20-25 years before he changed everything out to a 4 speed.
Matt
I got that part, my error was that I thought that was a picture of it in HIS car before it was removed, not yours. 
No harm no foul!
Matt
|
|
|
Re: a-body console question
[Re: Jim_Lusk]
#1762269
02/27/15 12:54 AM
02/27/15 12:54 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,655
Cut and Shoot, TX
kentj340
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,655
Cut and Shoot, TX
|
This is just a point of reference for anybody interested, not a criticism. The black console above looks too shiny in the flash photo - maybe it looks less glossy in natural light.
The FSMs all say low gloss paint for the consoles. Compare the black one to my green console above which is showing the factory original low gloss paint in natural light.
Low gloss is not to be confused with the suede finish on the dash and steering column.
If you don't see two dolphins, you need a vacation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
