Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? #1697793
11/11/14 10:17 PM
11/11/14 10:17 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
F
fullmetaljacket Offline OP
master
fullmetaljacket  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
Next season, I may experiment with a few different shocks but would rather start with a shock that has a good rep both on the street and the strip.
B-body, 10 inch tire, Super Stock springs with aluminum front eye bushings and Calvert 90/10's at the nose here.
Part numbers?

Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: fullmetaljacket] #1697794
11/12/14 10:08 PM
11/12/14 10:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,552
Rittman Ohio
fourgearsavoy Offline
I Live Here
fourgearsavoy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,552
Rittman Ohio
Quote:

Next season, I may experiment with a few different shocks but would rather start with a shock that has a good rep both on the street and the strip.
B-body, 10 inch tire, Super Stock springs with aluminum front eye bushings and Calvert 90/10's at the nose here.
Part numbers?



Lee they work well on my Savoy with just 455 and 454 SS springs and they are priced right for an entry level adjustable shock
I will se if I can dig up the correct part numbers for you.
Gus


64 Plymouth Savoy
493 Indy EZ's by Nick at Compu-Flow
5-Speed Richmond faceplate Liberty box
Dana 60
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: fourgearsavoy] #1697795
11/12/14 10:13 PM
11/12/14 10:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
F
fullmetaljacket Offline OP
master
fullmetaljacket  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
Thank you. I'd appreciate that.

Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: fullmetaljacket] #1697796
11/13/14 12:50 PM
11/13/14 12:50 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
OUTLAWD Offline
top fuel
OUTLAWD  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
PN will depend on ride height, and full droop. Take some measurements and flip through the catalog. I sent my measurements to Calvert, and they got me the correct shock.


Faster, Faster until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...

71 Swinger - slowly collecting dust/parts
66 Belv. II - just a streetcar
88 Mustang - turbo LS beater
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: fullmetaljacket] #1697797
11/13/14 01:34 PM
11/13/14 01:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
If I had your $$$ I`d get some bad dogs...........Why not?


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: fullmetaljacket] #1697798
11/13/14 04:52 PM
11/13/14 04:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
M
Monte_Smith Offline
master
Monte_Smith  Offline
master
M

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
Quote:

Next season, I may experiment with a few different shocks but would rather start with a shock that has a good rep both on the street and the strip.
B-body, 10 inch tire, Super Stock springs with aluminum front eye bushings and Calvert 90/10's at the nose here.
Part numbers?


I would opt for a "better" shock if funds allowed.

Monte

Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: Monte_Smith] #1697799
11/13/14 10:46 PM
11/13/14 10:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
F
fullmetaljacket Offline OP
master
fullmetaljacket  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
Which is a better shock and will it be a simple unit?

I like the simplicity of a knob turn soft to medium to hard.
I do have old school SS springs and not at all interested in Calverts Cal-tracs and such.options? # numbers.

Thank you in advance.

Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: fullmetaljacket] #1697800
11/13/14 11:50 PM
11/13/14 11:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,675
On the parachute mount
N
n20mstr Offline
master
n20mstr  Offline
master
N

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,675
On the parachute mount
Come on lee, my son spent 600.00 on double adjustable Afcos for his duster....Night and day diff from the rancho. Plus I bet a good double adj will be lighter than the rancho lol !


....BAD A$$ STREET CAR.....
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: n20mstr] #1697801
11/14/14 12:47 AM
11/14/14 12:47 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,587
Great Neck,LI,new york
hemi-itis Offline
I Live Here
hemi-itis  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,587
Great Neck,LI,new york
I went with Vi=kings DA on all 4 corners.

8330521-7.27.14001.jpg (102 downloads)

HEMI-ITIS has no cure.
My condition is fully BLOWN!!
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: hemi-itis] #1697802
11/14/14 01:33 AM
11/14/14 01:33 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Q
Quicktree Offline
I Win
Quicktree  Offline
I Win
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Strange

Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: Quicktree] #1697803
11/14/14 02:15 AM
11/14/14 02:15 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt Offline
master
1967dartgt  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
Afco done by the shock nerd.


Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads
STR Chassis fabraction
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: 1967dartgt] #1697804
11/14/14 11:32 AM
11/14/14 11:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
I apologize in advance for possibly hijacking this thread, but...

For a CalTrac-equipped car that's been using the original 5-way Ranchos, what would be viable (and affordable) options to upgrade to DA rear shocks? It's a street/strip E-body that's gone 1.45-1.46 60-fts. on 275R15 ET Street Radials.

I'm seeing references to Vi-King, Strange, Afco (and?) above, so I'm "all ears" not having used any of them. I do currently have QA-1 "R" series on the front, though. Thanks. - Brad

Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: BradH] #1697805
11/14/14 11:47 AM
11/14/14 11:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,362
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,362
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Quote:

I apologize in advance for possibly hijacking this thread, but...

For a CalTrac-equipped car that's been using the original 5-way Ranchos, what would be viable (and affordable) options to upgrade to DA rear shocks? It's a street/strip E-body that's gone 1.45-1.46 60-fts. on 275R15 ET Street Radials.

I'm seeing references to Vi-King, Strange, Afco (and?) above, so I'm "all ears" not having used any of them. I do currently have QA-1 "R" series on the front, though. Thanks. - Brad



The Vi-kings are the most affordable. I've been doing a lot of research on them lately b/c I need to upgrade to D/A shocks from my Rancho 9000s. The Ranchos have worked good on my car running mid 9s N/A, but I think they just aren't up to the task of handling my car on nitrous.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: an8sec70cuda] #1697806
11/14/14 03:21 PM
11/14/14 03:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
M
Monte_Smith Offline
master
Monte_Smith  Offline
master
M

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
Here is the deal on shocks...........ANY shock will work, just boils down to how WELL you want it to work. A cheap shock is a cheap shock and as such, its ability to control the housing or the front end will be limited. Countless people come on here and say they have so and so 90/10s and so and so 50/50s and their car works fine. Well it probably does, but the question is could it work BETTER with better shocks and the answer is likely yes. All boils down to how serious you are about maximizing your combo.

The OP poster has gone to, in some eyes, a ridiculous amount of time and expense to make the car as light as it can be. So to follow that up with just an "ok" shock just doesn't seem to make much sense in the grand scheme. I realize the weight loss deal has probably evolved into a challenge just to see how light it CAN be and that's great, but why not now try and see how good you can make it work. Those are my thoughts.

As I always say, buy the BEST shock you can afford, or are willing to pay for. Now one thing I will say, is that you WON'T get 1k shock performance from a set of $300 shocks, I don't care what these companies claim. You get what you pay for with shocks. Me personally, I would put DA shocks on both sides and probably the "least good" shock I would put on it would be an Afco.

I have seen a lot of talk about the Viking shocks, but I have no experience with them at all. Never seen one. I know their website says their staff is NOT new to shocks and has over 50 years experience, but they don't say who those people are, or where they came from. They do look somewhat similar, at least some of the bodies do, to a Hal or a QA-1 and then others look like Vari-Shocks..........so what does that mean?......probably nothing.

Monte

Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: Monte_Smith] #1697807
11/14/14 05:19 PM
11/14/14 05:19 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
deaks Offline
master
deaks  Offline
master

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
I had rancho 9 ways on mine, best 60ft was 1.43 reasonable for the car. Anyway, I made up my mind to try the Afco DA's with a goal of at least 1.40 ideally 1.39, bear in mind i do the car on a budget and for me to spend what i think is a lot of money i want to see results on what i consider a fairly mild set up. The car has ran a 1.36 now, so in my mind that more than justifies the costs.
Mick


69 Dart GTS 440 mopar .590 cam, Edelbrock heads, 3200#
best et 6.45, 106.78, 10.14, 132.88 mph, 1.47 60ft
best 60ft 1.36
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: deaks] #1697808
11/14/14 09:07 PM
11/14/14 09:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267
North, Alabama
D-50 Offline
pro stock
D-50  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267
North, Alabama
How much are the Afco double adjustable front shocks and where is the best place to buy them. I need to go to a adjustable shock on the front.


1.33 60 ft,6.21 at 110.59 in the 1/8, pump gas small block,2950lbs,drag radials,mufflers and driven to track ...
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: Monte_Smith] #1697809
11/15/14 01:12 AM
11/15/14 01:12 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
F
fullmetaljacket Offline OP
master
fullmetaljacket  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
Agree. I can probably spring for the Vikings on a good day but will consider the Afco's on a bad. I just was hearing alot about the Ranchos.

My current rear shocks are believe it or not, Pick up Truck shocks for a 72' Ram.

Hemi-itis here has the Vikings and is still in a state of tuning, so we'll see.
Will the vikings work on my car,? probably yes, but I'll only know by testing and tuning with them.
thanks for the input.

Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: fullmetaljacket] #1697810
11/15/14 01:28 AM
11/15/14 01:28 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,587
Great Neck,LI,new york
hemi-itis Offline
I Live Here
hemi-itis  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,587
Great Neck,LI,new york
Lee,I have been tuning the carbs and plug heat ranges.I went from a 5 way Rancho that is no longer made to a middle of the road shock that will perform better than before. How much better???????????? Don't know yet,will figure that out at a spring track rental.I'm real close on the carbs.Will be installing a race pak so I can make some educated adjustmants.Will keep y'all posted.


HEMI-ITIS has no cure.
My condition is fully BLOWN!!
Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: hemi-itis] #1697811
11/15/14 01:58 AM
11/15/14 01:58 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
F
fullmetaljacket Offline OP
master
fullmetaljacket  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,849
Please do, I want my 60'ft of fame.
Though in my case it may be more besides just suspension. It could be my cam center which was intended for control of wheel spin with a small tire at unsupervised trials back in the day/nights.

Re: R the rear rancho XL9000's still the shock of choice? [Re: fullmetaljacket] #1697812
11/15/14 03:23 AM
11/15/14 03:23 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 487
D
Dyno1 Offline
mopar
Dyno1  Offline
mopar
D

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 487
Chris King (hence the Vi-King)was the CEO of QA1. He left QA1 and started Viking, about 6 blocks from QA1.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1