Re: baddest small block combo ever
[Re: sc287]
#164670
12/09/08 08:41 AM
12/09/08 08:41 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,000 Tampa Florida
dc426
gotta keep'm separated
|
gotta keep'm separated
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,000
Tampa Florida
|
I don't know much about them. But the pro stock truck small blocks were pretty Bad AZZ! I think Patterson was building them I'm sure someone will chime in. DC
|
|
|
Re: baddest small block combo ever
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#164673
12/09/08 11:17 AM
12/09/08 11:17 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,809 Portage,michigan
B3422W5
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,809
Portage,michigan
|
The most potential is going to be from a w8/48 degree deal, but frankly, i have personally not yet seen anything in that configuration NA that runs near what you would "think it should" Dont know if nobody has hit on the right combo or what, or maybe there are cars out there i dont know of.
If i was going to make " for sure" big power, i would probably use the indy raised port 245 cnc deal on a 48 degree block,430-450 cubes, with lots of compression, big roller, pro systems dominator, light rings, good evac system, etc.
I would think the above combination, well sorted out, would propel any 3000 pound ish car into the 8's easily
69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight 418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam, footbrake street/strip car
1.41 best 60 foot 6.54 @ 105.20
|
|
|
Re: baddest small block combo ever
[Re: B3422W5]
#164674
12/09/08 11:25 AM
12/09/08 11:25 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Seems like the WoO Sprint Cars make amazing horsepower. Not sure what combo they use, though.
|
|
|
Re: baddest small block combo ever
#164676
12/09/08 11:28 AM
12/09/08 11:28 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,609 Las Vegas
Al_Alguire
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,609
Las Vegas
|
Well there are a number of small Hemi's in Comp Eliminator that run pretty dang hard.
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."
"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
|
|
|
Re: baddest small block combo ever
[Re: B3422W5]
#164677
12/09/08 11:30 AM
12/09/08 11:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714 Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms
Mr Wizzard
|
Mr Wizzard
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
|
Quote:
If i was going to make " for sure" big power, i would probably use the indy raised port 245 cnc deal on a 48 degree block,430-450 cubes, with lots of compression, big roller, pro systems dominator, light rings, good evac system, etc.
In other words start with a factory Mopar small block, throw it in the dumpster, build an entirely new custom design from scratch, and you'll have a killer engine combo.
|
|
|
Re: baddest small block combo ever
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#164678
12/09/08 12:29 PM
12/09/08 12:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123 Grand Haven, MI
patrick
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
|
well....depends on your definition of a small-block....
you're looking aftermarket block for strength.....
a P5 head probably has more raw HP potential than any W7/8/9, but there, you're talking very little in common with a factory SBM, save maybe bore centers.
bar none, the latest 5.7/6.1 hemi package has the most potential power of any stock "small block mopar" layout. they share bore spacing, bore, stroke, & main bearing size with older LA motors, and could be lumped into the "small block" category just as easily as a P5 engine or even a 48 degree W7/8/9 motor...
realistically the OEM 6.1 heads, max ported, have as much raw flow potential as a W7/8/9, plus the added benefit of no valve shrouding due to the valves opening up away from the bore...
1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD 1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!*** 2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T 2017 Grand Cherokee Overland 2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
|
|
|
Re: baddest small block combo ever
[Re: weedlayer]
#164683
12/09/08 06:30 PM
12/09/08 06:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 622 sing sing
unknown
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 622
sing sing
|
Quote:
mine is pretty bad according to all the eggspurts on this site. wrong parts, wrong, this, wrong that, just plain bad.
Dont worry every thing will be all right
|
|
|
Re: baddest small block combo ever
[Re: go green]
#164685
12/09/08 07:27 PM
12/09/08 07:27 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 636 Central,Ohio
FASTFISH420
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 636
Central,Ohio
|
The R4 P5 stuff is way cool,but you cant go real big on the cubes because the block..and those engines are way hard to find.. Here is a good run down on a very high HP small block,with wedge head... R3 block 60mm cam almost a inch lift 420 to 440 cubic inch very light weight crank aka,LA enterprise,winberg,etc GRP rods, custom Diamond pistons A double throw down set of W8 10 to 13 degree CFE heads. CFE sheetmatal manifold dual 4500 dominators external single stage peterson oil pump with star vacuum pump. I think you could make 1050 to 1075hp..yes with a wedge head!! I also think you could get 1000hp with cast manifold,single four at 420 to 440 inch also
Last edited by FASTFISH420; 12/09/08 07:33 PM.
1969 Barracuda 8 second all/motor small block
2014 Shelby GT500 Mustang
Uratchko Racing Engines
www.URE-RACING.com
|
|
|
Re: baddest small block combo ever
[Re: AlexP]
#164687
12/09/08 08:08 PM
12/09/08 08:08 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330 Lynchburg, VA
Leon441
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330
Lynchburg, VA
|
The 6.1 HEMI stuff is awesome no doubt. But, they are limited cubes and valve lift.
The R4/P5 stuff is awesome, Limited cubes
W8 not running good NA and talking up the Indy's Come on put the joint down. 8.4's in a backhalf doorslammer NA aint fast.
I feel a few years ago my 468 CID W8 with a cast intake and single 4-barrel made big power NA. No dyno sheets to prove it but with a nitrous cam and converter it ran 150MPH at 3,400 lbs NA.
The awesome engine would be a 6.1 based hemi aftermarket head and block that could go over 500 inches with sheetmetal intake and 4 split dominators. Or a P7 casting drag race ported with an XR block in place of the Hemi.
Everyone is scared to order a custom billet crank and make big cubic inches. I have ran many larger than 400 inch combos. I'm sorry but the bigger you go the more power they make as long as it can breath.
The match racers Sonny builds for have no better available parts than what is being promised for the small block Mopar. I just don't know why Mopar guys even talk about it. Obviously none have the will to pay for it. I have had a 900 HP small block for sale for over a year. Complete for $20,000. I get the PM's from people who thought they could build cheaper all the time after they find they couldn't. It's hard to see people manufactur parts for the small block mopar when truth is the sales won't pay for the paper it took to draw the plans up.
Leon
Career best 8.02 @ 169 at 3050# and 10" tires small block power.
|
|
|
Re: baddest small block combo ever
[Re: Leon441]
#164688
12/09/08 08:12 PM
12/09/08 08:12 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,645 Houston, Tx
AlexP
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,645
Houston, Tx
|
Quote:
The 6.1 HEMI stuff is awesome no doubt. But, they are limited cubes and valve lift.
Cubic inches are not a problem 426 and 440 motors are getting common. Bigger will be coming soon also. Getting a better lifter and rocker assembly is the key. And from working on the new motors I can tell you first hand. I would not want to be the poor sucker stuck trying to adjust valves on one of these....trust me. It will suck.
The power we can make with a 223/227 on a 114 with .557 lift is enough to make a 4300 lb car go 11.50's and faster. Take 1000-1500 lbs out of the chassis and you suddenly have a stupidly simple car that goes sub 10's in the right chassis.
Hey, it could happen...
|
|
|
|
|