Re: capable of 12.99 ?? / old school racing tricks ??
[Re: 67Satty]
#1614509
05/01/14 06:36 PM
05/01/14 06:36 PM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 179 California, U.S.A.
Torquemonster440
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 179
California, U.S.A.
|
that would be sweet, but its tore down for the cam swap right now. i'll probably get it running on Sunday. I just missed a killer deal on some used Hoosiers here in Riverside. $50 for 30x9x15 drag radials... sold yesterday tho .. guess i'll keep lookin.
1966 Satellie.. 12.55 @107.75. 906 heads. 3780 lbs.
|
|
|
Re: capable of 12.99 ?? / old school racing tricks ??
[Re: Torquemonster440]
#1614512
05/02/14 12:40 AM
05/02/14 12:40 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,031 s. e. pa.
calrobb2000
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,031
s. e. pa.
|
hi , easy 12s with a carter electric fuel pump mounted near the tank ! have fun !
|
|
|
Re: capable of 12.99 ?? / old school racing tricks ??
[Re: 70sixpkrt]
#1614517
05/03/14 01:20 AM
05/03/14 01:20 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319 Puyallup, WA
StealthWedge67
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319
Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
I thinly you should use MT ET Streets. The radials still spin. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/mtt-3755/overview/
Not true. Plenty of cars on M/T ET Radials going crazy fast, hanging the hoops. I run a set of 255/60 ET Radials and dead hook with 1.63X short times. Key is correct pressure. I have great results at about 19 psi.
I think the OP is a little ways off from holding a 12 second slip. But getting there is what this is all about, right?!... A converter would be money well spent. Even with the short exhaust, the mufflers will cost .2, So I'd find a way to uncork at the track. Depending on what you currently run, .020 shim head gaskets might get you a little compression, which equals horsepower. Good luck, and keep us posted on your progress.
Oh, by the way: My guess is you're currently in the neighborhood of 13.40's with the combo you describe, but good tuning might get you closer than I think.
Last edited by StealthWedge67; 05/03/14 01:38 AM.
LemonWedge - Street heavy / Strip ready - 11.07 @ 120
|
|
|
Re: capable of 12.99 ?? / old school racing tricks ??
[Re: Torquemonster440]
#1614519
05/03/14 04:12 PM
05/03/14 04:12 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,141 Phoenix,Az.
hemicop
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,141
Phoenix,Az.
|
Everyone here posted some Great recommendations & I'd probably follow about 99.99999% of them, especially going out & seeing what the car does first. I'm assuming this is a dual-purpose car & being put together with "stash" (spare) money to keep cost down & you're doing your own work. Assuming all that's true, & once you have a baseline established, I would (in order): 1) get a good converter 2) get some slicks 3) loosen up the front-end to get some weight transfer & clamp the rear springs 4) make certain you have good fuel flow. Better lines,pump, sump tank, whatever it takes 5)Lighten the car anyway you can. A good rule of thumb is 100lbs= 1/10sec. 6) Look at the F.A.S.T. series cars. These guys are running killer times & using alot of old school tricks that may apply to your ride.
+
|
|
|
Re: capable of 12.99 ?? / old school racing tricks ??
[Re: D-50]
#1614521
05/03/14 04:35 PM
05/03/14 04:35 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Quote:
I thinly you should use MT ET Streets. The radials still spin. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/mtt-3755/overview/
I have a best of 1.33 60 ft. with Drag Radials and home made caltrac bars with stock leaf springs. I will not use slicks again. Also run 18 lbs of air in them.
You guys keep telling him what air pressure to run... his car isnt anywhere near the same weight on the back.. he will have to play with that... the heavier it is the more air it needs
|
|
|
Re: capable of 12.99 ?? / old school racing tricks ??
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1614522
05/03/14 07:38 PM
05/03/14 07:38 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,250 Between a rock & a hard place
cudadoug
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,250
Between a rock & a hard place
|
First, drag radials are MORE THAN enough tire. Quite a few guys are in the 7's and didn't one brand X guy just go 6.99 on DR's?? Second, consider this edited post I did the other day... The 78 (440, OE crank rods and cast pistons...way down in the hole) was yanked from a wrecked 60K mile Monaco. To it was added a MP .484 stick, redone 915 heads, (stock ports, OE valve sizes), Eddy Torker, 850 TQ, recurved dizzy, small tube headers (1 3/4"?) 11" hemi converter, 4.56's in a all OE 65 Belvedere Wagon. Best of 12.32 @ 110 open headers on 9" x 28" slicks Car weighed 4,2xx lbs. The 76 (440 again OE crank rods and cast pistons) was found sitting idle in a 76 3/4 pu that had an been t-boned and rolled in 1980. It was given to me in 1985. So, after SITTING FOR FIVE YEARS: Tossed in the infamous MP .557 cam, redone 452 heads (2.14/1.81, home ported to MP templates), Holly SD intake, Holley 750 DP, MP elec dizzy, 2" Pro Parts headers, 4.30 gears, 10 x 28" McReary tires in a all OE 72 Duster, with full exhaust. 11.70's were too easy. And I mean OE STOCK 72 Duster. Full interior, all OE glass and sheet metal, flat hood, no scoop, steel rally wheels. Was 3440 with me in the seat according to my old notes. As far as your OE fuel system not being enough? Guess what both cars above ran? Yep..OE STOCK fuel tanks, 5/16" lines and mechanical pumps. On the Duster, since the motor had been sitting so long, I splurged and got a reman fuel pump. Wooooo whoooo! Further interesting to note: I added 3/8' alum line and a Carter elec pump to the Duster. Still ran 11.70's. The peanut gallery all said that I needed the "trick" Holley blue pump and bigger line. Okay...in with 1/2" line, a sump added to the tank and that blue pump. Wow...11.70's still. The junkyard Dart in the pic gave me a best of 11.41 @ 117 with a 5/16" line and auto parts store reman mechanical pump. Let's consider this from a well known Mopar guy, Mr. Porter: QUOTE: [the 5/16" fuel line....everyone seems to get all worked up about that. fact is......in 1995, i had a roller cammed 448 in it with ported 906's. same fuel system, flat hood, crank driven water pump, battery up front.....same 3670lbs.....running well into the 10's @ 125+(best of 10.61).] I have often wondered why we spend big dollars on billet cement mixer pumps, -8 and -10 lines...just so a .110" needle and seat can meter the fuel. Hmmm All that said, I'd go run the car right now the way it sits. Make 5 good runs and get a good baseline, go from there. Besides, it's WAY fun chasing and reaching that ET/MPH goal you've set for yourself.
|
|
|
Re: capable of 12.99 ?? / old school racing tricks ??
[Re: viperblue72]
#1614525
05/04/14 03:54 PM
05/04/14 03:54 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221 Branson, Mo.
joedust451
super gas
|
super gas
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
|
You should have no prob running 12s with that combo at that weight. I ran 10.91 @ 120.56 in my 3100 lb. Duster with "bone stock" 906s & a XE284H cam, PTC 9.5" 4400 stall, 4.10 gears, 9.73 compression, shifted at 5600, It ran 11.12 with a PTC 11" 2800 stall, 1.57 60ft.
Heck i ran 12.5s @ 105 in my 71 Swinger with a junkyard 360 magnum shifting at 5K.
|
|
|
|
|