Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue
[Re: PHJ426]
#1613700
05/06/14 10:21 PM
05/06/14 10:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813 Ontario,Canada
brads70
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813
Ontario,Canada
|
Quote:
For the money and machining center they are using you would think the pitman arms would fit correctly. Darn shame.
Any idea if they plan on resolving the issue?
Bummer! Seems hit and miss as far as fitment goes?
|
|
|
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue
[Re: dangina]
#1613706
05/07/14 08:06 PM
05/07/14 08:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813 Ontario,Canada
brads70
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813
Ontario,Canada
|
Quote:
Headman headers 78030 with eddy heads fit confirmed. Lots of clearance around it. Clears fast ratio arms as well. Closest it gets to the box anywhere is still 5/8" away from the head of the top corner bolt. And about 1/2"-5/8" away from the top of the steering coupler depending which way the coupler is turned. Best $150 spent lol
Good to know! Thanks!
|
|
|
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue
[Re: brads70]
#1613707
05/22/14 05:21 PM
05/22/14 05:21 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841 Santa Fe Springs, CA
Dan@Hotchkis
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841
Santa Fe Springs, CA
|
So as we continued down the rabbit hole of using this box, we hit another big issue. Our #7 Doug's Header tube was in direct contact with the steering column (formerly a column shift PS model) After closer examination, we deemed it due to the poor placement of the motor thanks to the /6 to SBM kit we got. So after some deliberation, we got the 73+ K-frame seen in the other thread and some good mounts from Schumaker. After installing everything, the motor was in the correct place, however, steering was in contact with the header tubes even worse than before. At that point we were getting ready to call it quits with the headers and I decided to break out the tape measure. This is what we found: The steering box seems to be pointing to the engine. I went over to another pre-72 A-Body with a 73+ K-Frame and a factory box and took the same measurement. Not even close. The box appeared to point slightly to the driverside, and was about 3/4" further that way than the Borgeson unit. My curiosity peaked and I went so far as to throw a factory box in to see if the K-frame was off or the Borgeson box. Imagine my surprise when I got this measurement. I spent some time on the phone with Borgeson the last couple days as well as e-mail to send them the pictures. The end result is that they feel the U-joint should be able to take up the slack and we ended up having to shim the 2 drivers side bolts to get the input shaft closer to where it needs to be. Not 100% thrilled about that. They said that they have had irregularities from 1/8 inch to 1/2" in input spline location car to car, but it seems odd to me that if I put a factory box back in, everything is where it should be. Also, this is the large sector box again, that had poor spline engagement with the Pitman, however I was able to get the split washer on. I had not head of this issue before, but thought it may be worth bringing up. So in current conclusion, the biggest detractors I have with this box are: 1. Pitman spline engagement 2. Build tolerances/quality control 3. These boxes are not new castings, they are rebuilt and modified from used cores and show wear/tear to indicate such. 4. Center "tight spot" is a really tight sector adjustment and will "wear in" after use. Happy Hot Rodding!
|
|
|
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue
[Re: brads70]
#1613709
05/22/14 10:13 PM
05/22/14 10:13 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
That is no good whatsoever. I feel like a doosh for ever endorsing their product. They need to admit it is not the Mopar K's first off. I could see an 1/8" to MAYBE a 1/4" error but 3/4"??? Uhhh guys that is 100% sucktastic....
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue
[Re: PHJ426]
#1613713
05/23/14 01:42 AM
05/23/14 01:42 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 373 sandwich IL
sublimehemi
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 373
sandwich IL
|
great...now you got me scared...i have my borgeson box mounted on qa1 k and gen 2 hemi...i already had to reconfigure my number 1 tube on my tti 2 1/8 header and get it re coated:( its not in car yet...but one thing i noticed about your pic is how crooked the box is...mine sits strait on my qa1 b body k frame...they messed that box up...send back and get new one..for me i have adjustment side to side on my new k and if i have to stick some shims like the factory did on some boxes i will..one thing for sure is i hate mopar power boxes even if they we sent to firm feel...the on center feeling sucks....and i am not going manual...had to many manual steering mopars which blow...keep us updated and i will let you know in a few weeks about mine..
70 charger ,all aluminum 528 hemi 727 cope rmvb,680hp 670 tq,full sequential holley hp efi,full hotchkis tvs,qa1 k and lowers,borgeson steering box cass viper 11.75 with cass s-trac dana 3.54
|
|
|
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue
[Re: sublimehemi]
#1613714
05/23/14 03:13 AM
05/23/14 03:13 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,491 Lethbridge, AB, Canada
dangina
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,491
Lethbridge, AB, Canada
|
SOB! My confidence is on a downward spiral. I thought these were new units being sold to us. The reason I bought this was for a NEW ps box, otherwise I should have kept my stage 3 FF box at less than half price. I'll have to wait till I can drive my car before I can comment further... until then here's some pics of the headman headers I used - no fitment issues: funny, now you mention it, reading your post I never knew that my steering shaft is on a angle, looks to be out about the 3/4" you mentioned...
|
|
|
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue
[Re: 72Swinger]
#1613716
05/23/14 03:31 AM
05/23/14 03:31 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
Dan can you measure the distance from centerline of input to centerline of output shafts? It looks like the input shafts are closer to the frame side by its design on the factory box.
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue
[Re: sublimehemi]
#1613717
05/23/14 10:38 AM
05/23/14 10:38 AM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841 Santa Fe Springs, CA
Dan@Hotchkis
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841
Santa Fe Springs, CA
|
Quote:
..one thing for sure is i hate mopar power boxes even if they we sent to firm feel...the on center feeling sucks....
That feeling you have is the mesh on the gears being worn in. Firm feel can make it feel like the Borgesons, but just like the Borgeson units, it will "wear in" after some use and there will be no difference. They are both worm and sector boxes, both are 1960's/1970's technology. Unless you get a fresh set of gears cut, once the center wears in, you'll always have that. The only benefit of the Borgeson unit I see as of now is if you are really desperate to lose 15lbs off the nose.
I can get the output shaft measurements, however it would be 2 different cars. The car with the Borgeson box is too far assembled for disassembly. But we have a same year A-body at the shop in the same configuration and a Firm Feel box. Once I get this car off the rack, I'll measure the other car too. Probably about this time next week, as I've got a couple cars in between the two on the schedule. I'll put it on my board.
|
|
|
|
|