Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: dangina] #1613699
05/06/14 05:14 PM
05/06/14 05:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,040
GA
roadrunninMark Offline
master
roadrunninMark  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,040
GA
Don't forget Steer and Gear does boxes as well. I picked up mine at Carlisle, so I saved shipping (plus shipping a core). This is good for east coasters or carlisle attendees.

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: PHJ426] #1613700
05/06/14 10:21 PM
05/06/14 10:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813
Ontario,Canada
brads70 Offline
super stock
brads70  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813
Ontario,Canada
Quote:

For the money and machining center they are using you would think the pitman arms would fit correctly. Darn shame.

Any idea if they plan on resolving the issue?




Bummer! Seems hit and miss as far as fitment goes?

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: brads70] #1613701
05/06/14 11:28 PM
05/06/14 11:28 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 116
Va Usa
B
beecrazy Offline
member
beecrazy  Offline
member
B

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 116
Va Usa
Guys

I must have lucked out with my small sector borgenson box, factory pitman arm , doughs headers and mildon road race pan. No clearance problems at all, 2 or 3 threads showing after nut and lock washer. I had enough clearance to headers that I was entertaining trying a quick ratio pitman arm. This is in a 69 Bee RB block Doughs D452 2" headers. The pain was the lakewood bellhousing with block protector.

Kevin

8136701-photo_3S.JPG (367 downloads)
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: beecrazy] #1613702
05/06/14 11:32 PM
05/06/14 11:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 116
Va Usa
B
beecrazy Offline
member
beecrazy  Offline
member
B

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 116
Va Usa
Pitman arm threads

8136706-photo_1S.JPG (378 downloads)
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: beecrazy] #1613703
05/06/14 11:39 PM
05/06/14 11:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 116
Va Usa
B
beecrazy Offline
member
beecrazy  Offline
member
B

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 116
Va Usa
Pan Headers and new steering box no issues.

Kevin

8136712-Pan-1.JPG (365 downloads)
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: beecrazy] #1613704
05/06/14 11:52 PM
05/06/14 11:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 116
Va Usa
B
beecrazy Offline
member
beecrazy  Offline
member
B

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 116
Va Usa
The steering box install went well for me. I purchased a used steering shaft from a ps steering car last year at Carlisle as mine was a manual steering car. I bought the box along with an install kit with fittings and modified plunge joint around Christmas this year. This setup for me was a true bolt in. I drove car on Sat for the first time and it felt like a new car.

I also did other mods at same time. Removed and welded K frame, new Oil pan, new FF 1.12 Torsion bars and new FF strut rods. I have a hotchkiss 1 3/8 sway bar and FF upper control arm. Just need a good alignment now.

Kevin

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: beecrazy] #1613705
05/07/14 06:56 PM
05/07/14 06:56 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,491
Lethbridge, AB, Canada
dangina Offline
pro stock
dangina  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,491
Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Headman headers 78030 with eddy heads fit confirmed. Lots of clearance around it. Clears fast ratio arms as well. Closest it gets to the box anywhere is still 5/8" away from the head of the top corner bolt. And about 1/2"-5/8" away from the top of the steering coupler depending which way the coupler is turned. Best $150 spent lol

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: dangina] #1613706
05/07/14 08:06 PM
05/07/14 08:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813
Ontario,Canada
brads70 Offline
super stock
brads70  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813
Ontario,Canada
Quote:

Headman headers 78030 with eddy heads fit confirmed. Lots of clearance around it. Clears fast ratio arms as well. Closest it gets to the box anywhere is still 5/8" away from the head of the top corner bolt. And about 1/2"-5/8" away from the top of the steering coupler depending which way the coupler is turned. Best $150 spent lol




Good to know! Thanks!

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: brads70] #1613707
05/22/14 05:21 PM
05/22/14 05:21 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Dan@Hotchkis Offline OP
super stock
Dan@Hotchkis  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841
Santa Fe Springs, CA
So as we continued down the rabbit hole of using this box, we hit another big issue. Our #7 Doug's Header tube was in direct contact with the steering column (formerly a column shift PS model) After closer examination, we deemed it due to the poor placement of the motor thanks to the /6 to SBM kit we got. So after some deliberation, we got the 73+ K-frame seen in the other thread and some good mounts from Schumaker. After installing everything, the motor was in the correct place, however, steering was in contact with the header tubes even worse than before. At that point we were getting ready to call it quits with the headers and I decided to break out the tape measure. This is what we found:




The steering box seems to be pointing to the engine. I went over to another pre-72 A-Body with a 73+ K-Frame and a factory box and took the same measurement. Not even close. The box appeared to point slightly to the driverside, and was about 3/4" further that way than the Borgeson unit.

My curiosity peaked and I went so far as to throw a factory box in to see if the K-frame was off or the Borgeson box. Imagine my surprise when I got this measurement.





I spent some time on the phone with Borgeson the last couple days as well as e-mail to send them the pictures. The end result is that they feel the U-joint should be able to take up the slack and we ended up having to shim the 2 drivers side bolts to get the input shaft closer to where it needs to be. Not 100% thrilled about that. They said that they have had irregularities from 1/8 inch to 1/2" in input spline location car to car, but it seems odd to me that if I put a factory box back in, everything is where it should be.
Also, this is the large sector box again, that had poor spline engagement with the Pitman, however I was able to get the split washer on. I had not head of this issue before, but thought it may be worth bringing up.

So in current conclusion, the biggest detractors I have with this box are:

1. Pitman spline engagement
2. Build tolerances/quality control
3. These boxes are not new castings, they are rebuilt and modified from used cores and show wear/tear to indicate such.
4. Center "tight spot" is a really tight sector adjustment and will "wear in" after use.

Happy Hot Rodding!

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: Dan@Hotchkis] #1613708
05/22/14 09:06 PM
05/22/14 09:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813
Ontario,Canada
brads70 Offline
super stock
brads70  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 813
Ontario,Canada
Wow that sure is disappointing to see! I'll stick with my FF box. Is the plate beefy enough to machine it so it sits square? Not that you should have to for that kind of money!

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: brads70] #1613709
05/22/14 10:13 PM
05/22/14 10:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
72Swinger Offline
master
72Swinger  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
That is no good whatsoever. I feel like a doosh for ever endorsing their product. They need to admit it is not the Mopar K's first off. I could see an 1/8" to MAYBE a 1/4" error but 3/4"??? Uhhh guys that is 100% sucktastic....


Mopar to the bone!!!
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: 72Swinger] #1613710
05/22/14 11:18 PM
05/22/14 11:18 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,456
Fly Over States
P
PHJ426 Offline
master
PHJ426  Offline
master
P

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,456
Fly Over States
So Borgeson folks never heard of Statistical Process Control?

http://www.baldrige21.com/BALDRIGE%20REC...20Training.html

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: PHJ426] #1613711
05/23/14 12:50 AM
05/23/14 12:50 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 240
Plano, Texas
6
68cuda440 Offline
enthusiast
68cuda440  Offline
enthusiast
6

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 240
Plano, Texas
Quote:

So Borgeson folks never heard of Statistical Process Control?





Not many of the aftermarket suppliers have. Not many know what GD&T means either. If the dimensions and tolerances are called out properly on the print then SPC is not really needed. As long as the tolerances of the print are met the part should fit. Now SPC and a corresponding effective QC program would be most beneficial in mass producing a part that meets those requirements consistently and cost effectively. The only challenge I would see is to establish a location tolerance for the frame you are bolting the part to. This frame was made 40+ years ago and may have had a rough life. It is a reality, but too many of the manufacturers we deal with use it as an excuse.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_dimensioning_and_tolerancing

One of the parts on my car was the "first" for an A body. It did not even come close to fitting. When they said their prototype fit I asked them to send me the engineering drawing. I found the mistake, the drawer (I will not call that person an engineer) did not properly dimension a location which left it open to interpretation by the fabricator. I corrected the print, sent it and the part back. They sent me back a correct fitting part a few weeks later. They picked up all the shipping charges and such and overall were pretty cooperative.

-Michael


Michael 1968 Barracuda Notchback Coupe 440 EFI 6-pack, T56 Magnum 6-spd
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: Dan@Hotchkis] #1613712
05/23/14 12:59 AM
05/23/14 12:59 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 240
Plano, Texas
6
68cuda440 Offline
enthusiast
68cuda440  Offline
enthusiast
6

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 240
Plano, Texas
Quote:

The end result is that they feel the U-joint should be able to take up the slack and we ended up having to shim the 2 drivers side bolts to get the input shaft closer to where it needs to be. Not 100% thrilled about that.




Can you mill the mounting surface of the box to correct the problem? Determine how much angle needs to be cut to bring it true? I would be more comfortable with that than a shim. If you have access to a mill you could sneak up on it, estimate based on the shim thickness, go halfway and test fit. Repeat until the tolerance is tolerable.

-Michael


Michael 1968 Barracuda Notchback Coupe 440 EFI 6-pack, T56 Magnum 6-spd
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: PHJ426] #1613713
05/23/14 01:42 AM
05/23/14 01:42 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 373
sandwich IL
sublimehemi Offline
enthusiast
sublimehemi  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 373
sandwich IL
great...now you got me scared...i have my borgeson box mounted on qa1 k and gen 2 hemi...i already had to reconfigure my number 1 tube on my tti 2 1/8 header and get it re coated:( its not in car yet...but one thing i noticed about your pic is how crooked the box is...mine sits strait on my qa1 b body k frame...they messed that box up...send back and get new one..for me i have adjustment side to side on my new k and if i have to stick some shims like the factory did on some boxes i will..one thing for sure is i hate mopar power boxes even if they we sent to firm feel...the on center feeling sucks....and i am not going manual...had to many manual steering mopars which blow...keep us updated and i will let you know in a few weeks about mine..


70 charger ,all aluminum 528 hemi 727 cope rmvb,680hp 670 tq,full sequential holley hp efi,full hotchkis tvs,qa1 k and lowers,borgeson steering box cass viper 11.75 with cass s-trac dana 3.54
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: sublimehemi] #1613714
05/23/14 03:13 AM
05/23/14 03:13 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,491
Lethbridge, AB, Canada
dangina Offline
pro stock
dangina  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,491
Lethbridge, AB, Canada
SOB! My confidence is on a downward spiral. I thought these were new units being sold to us. The reason I bought this was for a NEW ps box, otherwise I should have kept my stage 3 FF box at less than half price. I'll have to wait till I can drive my car before I can comment further...

until then here's some pics of the headman headers I used - no fitment issues:





funny, now you mention it, reading your post I never knew that my steering shaft is on a angle, looks to be out about the 3/4" you mentioned...

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: dangina] #1613715
05/23/14 03:21 AM
05/23/14 03:21 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
72Swinger Offline
master
72Swinger  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
Mine is at not as bad an angle,but, an angle none the less...


Mopar to the bone!!!
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: 72Swinger] #1613716
05/23/14 03:31 AM
05/23/14 03:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
72Swinger Offline
master
72Swinger  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
Dan can you measure the distance from centerline of input to centerline of output shafts? It looks like the input shafts are closer to the frame side by its design on the factory box.


Mopar to the bone!!!
Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: sublimehemi] #1613717
05/23/14 10:38 AM
05/23/14 10:38 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Dan@Hotchkis Offline OP
super stock
Dan@Hotchkis  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 841
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Quote:

..one thing for sure is i hate mopar power boxes even if they we sent to firm feel...the on center feeling sucks....




That feeling you have is the mesh on the gears being worn in. Firm feel can make it feel like the Borgesons, but just like the Borgeson units, it will "wear in" after some use and there will be no difference. They are both worm and sector boxes, both are 1960's/1970's technology. Unless you get a fresh set of gears cut, once the center wears in, you'll always have that. The only benefit of the Borgeson unit I see as of now is if you are really desperate to lose 15lbs off the nose.

I can get the output shaft measurements, however it would be 2 different cars. The car with the Borgeson box is too far assembled for disassembly. But we have a same year A-body at the shop in the same configuration and a Firm Feel box. Once I get this car off the rack, I'll measure the other car too. Probably about this time next week, as I've got a couple cars in between the two on the schedule.
I'll put it on my board.

Re: Borgeson / Pitman Fitment Issue [Re: sublimehemi] #1613718
05/23/14 11:31 AM
05/23/14 11:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,976
Chilliwack B.C. Canada
R
RUNCHARGER Offline
I Live Here
RUNCHARGER  Offline
I Live Here
R

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,976
Chilliwack B.C. Canada
Thanks for posting this. I was thinking of springing loose the coin for that box, sure glad I didn't now.

Sheldon

Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1