Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: 68roadrunner]
#1610505
04/22/14 12:49 AM
04/22/14 12:49 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,190 Melbourne , Australia
LA360
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,190
Melbourne , Australia
|
Gregsdart runs the 440-1 heads an make somewhere around 900hp, so I would imagine your combination isn't maxed out. Generally speaking, adding more cubic inches will bring down your peak power RPM as you stated. If all else remains the same, I would imagine the gains would be minimal. Here's a for you
Alan Jones
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: 68roadrunner]
#1610506
04/22/14 06:42 AM
04/22/14 06:42 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,646 Ontario,Canada
firefighter3931
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,646
Ontario,Canada
|
Dwayne at PRH built an aluminum block 572 for one of our members using -1 heads and that combo made 900+ hp on the dyno. The car is a 68 Charger and has been as fast as 9.0 NA at a raceweight of 3700lbs You have lots of upside with those heads Ron
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: LA360]
#1610507
04/22/14 06:54 AM
04/22/14 06:54 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,179 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,179
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
Quote:
Gregsdart runs the 440-1 heads an make somewhere around 900hp, so I would imagine your combination isn't maxed out. Generally speaking, adding more cubic inches will bring down your peak power RPM as you stated. If all else remains the same, I would imagine the gains would be minimal. Here's a for you
You could send them out to have them ported to the max, if the 325 has enough meat left in them. Do they have the 2.25 intake valves? That would be my first move. Consider buying the valves a touch longer for better installed height if you are going up in valve size. It is tough (maybe impossible)to get more than 2.050 out of the standard length valves. I have plus retainers and keepers to get there. I started with a max ported 440-1 and told the porter that I wanted lots of runner volume for Alky, and they run pretty good for a 528 cube motor. I also run the 3X intake.
8.582, 160.18 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: gregsdart]
#1610508
04/22/14 03:31 PM
04/22/14 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 882 ky
68roadrunner
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 882
ky
|
Quote:
Quote:
Gregsdart runs the 440-1 heads an make somewhere around 900hp, so I would imagine your combination isn't maxed out. Generally speaking, adding more cubic inches will bring down your peak power RPM as you stated. If all else remains the same, I would imagine the gains would be minimal. Here's a for you
You could send them out to have them ported to the max, if the 325 has enough meat left in them. Do they have the 2.25 intake valves? That would be my first move. Consider buying the valves a touch longer for better installed height if you are going up in valve size. It is tough (maybe impossible)to get more than 2.050 out of the standard length valves. I have plus retainers and keepers to get there. I started with a max ported 440-1 and told the porter that I wanted lots of runner volume for Alky, and they run pretty good for a 528 cube motor. I also run the 3X intake.
this combo is no where close to max effort, and dont intend to get it on the edge,i want my engine to go 600 passes without any problem. no they are not 2.25 valves, there is alot that could be done these apparently. i also run alky but mine is carburated. so i can make 900hp with these heads, just need some good head work.
so if i put these heads on 540-572 as they are i will still be below 800hp is that what we think?
thanks guys
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: 68roadrunner]
#1610509
04/22/14 03:49 PM
04/22/14 03:49 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 655 Huntsville, AL
Airwoofer
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 655
Huntsville, AL
|
Indy 325 CNC heads flow 370 at .700 lift with the 2.18 intakes. I had Jim LaRoy up in Challis, ID do the valve job on them and a little touch up to unshroud the chambers to the 4.5 bore. Here is how my 325's flow with the POS Indy valve job (before) and a good valve job. Note the ex/in flow ratio is pretty constant at around 82% across the lift range. lift............before..........after .100..........69/61.........80/68 .200........144/123......158/134 .300........215/172......226/183 .400........274/217......277/229 .500........321/251......320/265 .600........346/280......349/290 .700........362/301......368/307 .800........372/317......372/327 My heads have the 2.18 intakes. Jim experimented with dropping a 2.25 valve in without changing the seat. These are the results (I think he used a different cylinder as the before numbers are a little different): Lift...........before..........after .100...........80............91 cfm .200..........158..........177 cfm .300..........227..........239 cfm .400..........281..........292 cfm .500..........329..........335 cfm .600..........354..........354 cfm These are on a 540 (4.500 x 4.250) with a Indy R2 cam and 14-1. Not dyno'd yet or run down the track. I am hoping to get in the neighborhood of 800 HP.
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: Airwoofer]
#1610510
04/22/14 04:13 PM
04/22/14 04:13 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 882 ky
68roadrunner
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 882
ky
|
Quote:
Indy 325 CNC heads flow 370 at .700 lift with the 2.18 intakes.
I had Jim LaRoy up in Challis, ID do the valve job on them and a little touch up to unshroud the chambers to the 4.5 bore. Here is how my 325's flow with the POS Indy valve job (before) and a good valve job. Note the ex/in flow ratio is pretty constant at around 82% across the lift range.
lift............before..........after
.100..........69/61.........80/68 .200........144/123......158/134 .300........215/172......226/183 .400........274/217......277/229 .500........321/251......320/265 .600........346/280......349/290 .700........362/301......368/307 .800........372/317......372/327
My heads have the 2.18 intakes. Jim experimented with dropping a 2.25 valve in without changing the seat. These are the results (I think he used a different cylinder as the before numbers are a little different):
i also run the r2 cam, w/1.5 rockers. i have a bigger one i havent run yet that is a 112 separation .750 lift that might be good in a bigger engine
i dont remember my flow numbers off my head, they was flowed as soon as i got them from indy, there has been a valve job on them since then
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: AndyF]
#1610514
04/22/14 10:17 PM
04/22/14 10:17 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 882 ky
68roadrunner
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 882
ky
|
Quote:
Just depends on the other parts in the combo. You can crutch the smaller heads with extra valve lift, more compression, better oil control, etc.
I pushed my EZ heads up over 900 hp by working on everything other than the heads. [/quot
was thinking about that, open the valve further and hold it longer
how much torque will i gain going with more stroke like the 4.25 or 4.5
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: 68roadrunner]
#1610516
04/23/14 05:31 PM
04/23/14 05:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,179 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,179
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Gregsdart runs the 440-1 heads an make somewhere around 900hp, so I would imagine your combination isn't maxed out. Generally speaking, adding more cubic inches will bring down your peak power RPM as you stated. If all else remains the same, I would imagine the gains would be minimal. Here's a for you
You could send them out to have them ported to the max, if the 325 has enough meat left in them. Do they have the 2.25 intake valves? That would be my first move. Consider buying the valves a touch longer for better installed height if you are going up in valve size. It is tough (maybe impossible)to get more than 2.050 out of the standard length valves. I have plus retainers and keepers to get there. I started with a max ported 440-1 and told the porter that I wanted lots of runner volume for Alky, and they run pretty good for a 528 cube motor. I also run the 3X intake.
this combo is no where close to max effort, and dont intend to get it on the edge,i want my engine to go 600 passes without any problem. no they are not 2.25 valves, there is alot that could be done these apparently. i also run alky but mine is carburated. so i can make 900hp with these heads, just need some good head work.
so if i put these heads on 540-572 as they are i will still be below 800hp is that what we think?
thanks guys
I am guessing that 800 hp will be close. The head flow just isn't enough to support more. By porting the heads as far as you can, you can run a less aggressive lobe profile on the cam to help get you the life you want out of the motor. That doesn't mean less duration on the cam, just a slower rate opening the valves to not beat everything up as quick. For max number of runs, I would go as large as I could on the short block (572) port the heads with 2.25 intake valves and pick the cam gears and converter to go with them. The rpm range should be about 6700 max shift points, which will help the motor live. The torque is going to max out at about 5,000 rpm or less, so gearing may need to change, and the converter for sure.
8.582, 160.18 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: 68roadrunner]
#1610520
05/13/14 08:15 PM
05/13/14 08:15 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,314 Charlotte, NC
LSP
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,314
Charlotte, NC
|
Quote:
the question is when running a smaller head than the cubic inch requires what does it do beside lowering the torque curve..
i have the 325cc -1 heads on my stock block 499, with the weight to et formula it makes 735hp. so thats a little less than 1.5 hp per ci
going to build a larger engine with a aluminum block i can build it any size, but will the heads limit the hp at a certain point? will i still gain some hp even with to small a head.
cant really afford more heads yet, just wanting that stock block out of there before it gives up.
thanks for some input.
If you think the head's too small, put some longer lobes in it.
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: LSP]
#1610521
05/13/14 09:10 PM
05/13/14 09:10 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384 Upstate NY
Bigcube
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384
Upstate NY
|
My combo was head limited at 557 cubes. I have a 4.5" stroke with 4.440 bore. Last time I was running at the track it was consistent 9.0 car and dipped into the 8's a couple of times on a good track. It made right around 850 HP and race weight was 3000#. I have hand ported -1 heads. It was ~15:1 with a .750/.720 cam. Peak HP 850@7200 and peak TQ 722@5500. Build as big as you can, you can always swap pistons/heads later. I'm in the process of taming it for pump gas and street use, I can't wait to see how it does at 11:1 and 93 octane gas Picture is my head flow data from 2 different benches. MCH exhaust numbers are with a short header tube, PRH ex numbers don't have a tube attached.
Jim
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: jafr]
#1610522
05/15/14 12:21 AM
05/15/14 12:21 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 882 ky
68roadrunner
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 882
ky
|
Quote:
I am building the same motor as Lee what do you guys think as far as camshaft?
Lee, I hurt the 512 Saturday. Luckily we made a split at 4. I took the indy block and crank to Saint Louis today.
that sucks, dad said you had problems, is it fixable?
how long will it take them on the indy block?
bigcube give us some cam numbers
|
|
|
Re: cyl. heads size and ci.
[Re: 68roadrunner]
#1610523
05/15/14 06:52 AM
05/15/14 06:52 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384 Upstate NY
Bigcube
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384
Upstate NY
|
The cam that was in it was .753I/.730E, duration @ .050 is 281I/288E and it was 112 deg lobe separation. Mine is a KB block and I went with 4.440 bore to leave a little room to grow just in case I need to bore it.
Jim
|
|
|
|
|