|
|
Re: Pro/Con Front runner width
[Re: Jeepmon]
#1583476
02/24/14 06:09 PM
02/24/14 06:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
|
3.5" will be lighter than a 4. You will also have less tire in the ground so less rolling resistance.
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."
"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
|
|
|
Re: Pro/Con Front runner width
[Re: Al_Alguire]
#1583478
02/24/14 06:59 PM
02/24/14 06:59 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
3.5" will be lighter than a 4. You will also have less tire in the ground so less rolling resistance.
 ..... plus with the weight you shed you
wont need the big wheels and tires... you have to
start thinking light weight now
|
|
|
Re: Pro/Con Front runner width
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1583479
02/24/14 07:41 PM
02/24/14 07:41 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 8,094
Sunnyvale, CA
Jeepmon
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 8,094
Sunnyvale, CA
|
Quote:
Quote:
3.5" will be lighter than a 4. You will also have less tire in the ground so less rolling resistance.
..... plus with the weight you shed you
wont need the big wheels and tires... you have to
start thinking light weight now
Are you saying I need to go on a diet? gee thanks
|
|
|
Re: Pro/Con Front runner width
[Re: Jeepmon]
#1583480
02/24/14 07:55 PM
02/24/14 07:55 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
3.5" will be lighter than a 4. You will also have less tire in the ground so less rolling resistance.
..... plus with the weight you shed you
wont need the big wheels and tires... you have to
start thinking light weight now
Are you saying I need to go on a diet? gee thanks
That would be personal thing ... I dont go there
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
