Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s? [Re: DodgeCharger] #1562679
01/15/14 04:18 PM
01/15/14 04:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,373
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,373
Las Vegas
Having put a few cars in the 8's or better I had no idea it was as easy as some think. I also do not think the 100lbs is a tenth is applicable when you start running 8's by any means. As preciously stated it just does not seem to pan out. HOWEVER I have seen engine combos go from a door car to a digger and they seem to have that math work a lot better than just dropping 200lbs from an 8.70 door car and running 8.50's.


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s? [Re: DodgeCharger] #1562680
01/15/14 05:10 PM
01/15/14 05:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 298
Shelton, Ct.
5
572_HEMI_Cuda Offline
enthusiast
572_HEMI_Cuda  Offline
enthusiast
5

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 298
Shelton, Ct.
Quote:

I tested a theory on Wallace race calculators. The 100 lbs per 10th of a second is still pretty accurate at these ET levels. In my experience it is a lot easier to get a light car to perform that a heavy one.




I hear you but those calculators are more for entertainment value to me. those calculators say I should have a 1.13 60 ft not 1.32 like my car does. I still have plenty of chassis tuning left but still wont ever have a 1.13 60 ft.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1