SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
#155740
11/24/08 10:38 AM
11/24/08 10:38 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
Can someone tell me if I'm figuring this right. I went on the NHRA site and saw the 71' Plymouth Duster with the hi comp 340 is factored at 314 hp and falls into the 10.04 lb weight break ( SS/I or IA ). Since you can move up or down one class, couldnt this be a SS/HA combination, and race weight with driver be 3153 lbs ( 314 hp X 9.50 lbs = 2983 + 170 lbs = 3153 )? I wanna know if I'm doing this right and also, has anyone ever ran a Duster in SS/HA ? Do you think it would be a decent combination ? Thanks for any help
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: scatpacktom]
#155742
11/24/08 11:25 AM
11/24/08 11:25 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
OK...I was looking at the Stock eliminator weight . My mistake. It keeps looking like a 360 is the way to go as far as the engine combination. I was hoping maybe a hi comp 340, but it just doesnt seem like the way to go.
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: JC Childress]
#155744
11/24/08 11:49 AM
11/24/08 11:49 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,155 Tucson, Arizona
clonestocker
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,155
Tucson, Arizona
|
The 360 combos are good. Lots of options. Small cam, small carb, big cam, big carb.
I built an Aspen Wagon Stocker that now resides in Las Vegas. I went to a reputable head guy (rip Don), he did my heads, cam, piston/ring package. I did change the ring package at assembly. It went a best of 1.06 under with everything done by myself and locally. It was fun but to rich for my blood. STOCKER ARE WAY COOL. good luck matt
[img] [/img]
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: JC Childress]
#155745
11/24/08 12:08 PM
11/24/08 12:08 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595 On the south side of Nowhere
S/ST 3040
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
|
The reason the high compression 340 isn't competitive is the heads. Since the 71-earlier 340 had 2.02" valves and the runner volume spec is 158-162cc........when you open up the bowls for the 2.02" valve and shrink the runners to stay legal, you choke off the port. 283 HP factoring helps. ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/Twocents.gif)
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: S/ST 3040]
#155746
11/24/08 12:28 PM
11/24/08 12:28 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
If you were building a 360 SS engine....would you be better off using the Magnum heads ( even though they hit you with a weight penalty ). Is it an advantage to using these heads ? I know they flow more, but what about the pushrod oiling....does that impose any problems or how do you experts feel about this comparison ?
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: S/ST 3040]
#155752
11/25/08 10:40 AM
11/25/08 10:40 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595 On the south side of Nowhere
S/ST 3040
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
|
Quote:
The reason the high compression 340 isn't competitive is the heads. Since the 71-earlier 340 had 2.02" valves and the runner volume spec is 158-162cc........when you open up the bowls for the 2.02" valve and shrink the runners to stay legal, you choke off the port. 283 HP factoring helps.
In an afterthought, it dawned on me that the 68-70 340 used the smaller AVS which also doesn't help the HP but, am unable to edit any of my posts, that are more than a couple hours old.
![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shruggy.gif)
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: S/ST 3040]
#155753
11/25/08 11:18 AM
11/25/08 11:18 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
But the 71' having the thermoquad did help for sure. I'm heavily considering the low comp 340 and running it in SS/IA , at least for now....but who knows. I wish I knew if anyone had done extensive testing with the Super Victor compared to the Victor 340 on the super stock type heads.
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: S/ST 3040]
#155755
11/25/08 11:37 AM
11/25/08 11:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
I'm looking at a 71 and a 73 model. Havent decided just yet on either one.
Since they let you run the older cars in Gt , it can really get confusing.
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: JC Childress]
#155756
11/25/08 01:13 PM
11/25/08 01:13 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,993 new jersey usa
11secdart
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,993
new jersey usa
|
I am only a bracket racer but I really like Stock and Super/Stock, I am still confused on older cars running in GT classes which I thought were for late model cars/bodies.
68 Dart 410 / 904 92 D150 original owner 21 Ram 1500 Quad Cab, Big Horn , Hemi ,4x4 23 Audi Q5 16 Honda HRV
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: JC Childress]
#155758
11/25/08 01:29 PM
11/25/08 01:29 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,060 Western New York
sixpackbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,060
Western New York
|
JC after talking yesterday I was thinking, dangerous sometimes, build the 71 TQ package. If you do not like it switch to a 72 340 small valve. The bodies are close enough for tech. The only thing you would be out if you switched would be heads and pistons. Expensive yes but better than trying to field a whole new car. BTW the Victor 340 is still the way to go. If you decide to do this I can help you with the proper mods for the intake.
1959 Bugeye Sprite 1967 Charger Black L code 1967 Coronet R/T Convert Green 440 auto bought from original owner 1968 Charger R/T Bronze 440 4 spd console AM/FM 1969 Super Bee WM21H B5 A40 D21 N96 1969 Barracuda Formula S 340 Convert pilot car 1969 Hemi Road Runner RM23J D32 Omaha orange 4.10 Dana N96 N85 1970 Super Bee WM23N FE5 V1X 3.91 axle package, N96 1970 Road Runner RM21N B3 V1X D13 1971 MG Midget 1971 Road Runner RM23H GW3, A57 1972 Road Runner RM23P FY1, D21
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: sixpackbee]
#155759
11/26/08 11:12 AM
11/26/08 11:12 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
I see where youre coming from, but after more and more research and thought, I think the 360 is the way to go. It carries just a tick more weight than the low comp 340, but you get an additional 20 cubic inches ! Plus, you wont have to turn the engine near as hard. At least thats how I'm thinking right now.
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: bremotorsports]
#155762
11/26/08 12:24 PM
11/26/08 12:24 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
I am really liking the 360 combo. Even carrying a few extra pounds, it seems like the logical way to go.
For whatever reason, it just seems like nobody has got the Super Victor to outperform the old Victor 340.
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: JC Childress]
#155763
11/26/08 05:51 PM
11/26/08 05:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 269 Kansas wishing I was in Ohio
SeanD
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 269
Kansas wishing I was in Ohio
|
Quote:
For whatever reason, it just seems like nobody has got the Super Victor to outperform the old Victor 340.
A few years ago(maybe 10 years) I read an article about someone mating up a sb chevy victor intake to a 340 and running in ss/GT. They said the chevy intake outperformed the mopar intake by a bunch.
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: SeanD]
#155764
11/26/08 06:00 PM
11/26/08 06:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
Yeah, I know of folks that have done that. I just dont know how big of an advantage it is, if any.
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: SeanD]
#155766
11/26/08 08:29 PM
11/26/08 08:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,898 Florida
Locomotion
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,898
Florida
|
Quote:
Quote:
For whatever reason, it just seems like nobody has got the Super Victor to outperform the old Victor 340.
A few years ago(maybe 10 years) I read an article about someone mating up a sb chevy victor intake to a 340 and running in ss/GT. They said the chevy intake outperformed the mopar intake by a bunch.
Hamburger use to have an adapter to use a small block Chevy intake on a small block Mopar. But that was in the '70's or '80's before the Mopar selection expanded.
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: S/ST 3040]
#155772
12/01/08 02:49 PM
12/01/08 02:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
I knew Louis Smith had done some testing with the Chevy intakes. I'm really suprised that in todays world of r&d that no one has ever just back to backed a bunch of intakes, including the Chevy against the Mopar intake.
We did a dyno test on one of our customers engines ( at his request and expense ) , its a 355 Chevy, roughly 600hp, and the winner was a World Products intake.
Some mentioned the Port A Sonic was better on the 360....what makes the 360 like a different intake than the 340 ?
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: sixpackbee]
#155774
12/01/08 03:53 PM
12/01/08 03:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
What different intakes did ya'll test ? Were they on Super Stock engines and if so...what did the different engines like ?
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: JC Childress]
#155775
12/01/08 04:00 PM
12/01/08 04:00 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,060 Western New York
sixpackbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,060
Western New York
|
The 340s liked the Victor and the 360s liked the Port-O-Sonic. Looking into a sheet metal design would be interesting. BTW the engines tested were front runners in their time as was the shop so the tests were legit.
1959 Bugeye Sprite 1967 Charger Black L code 1967 Coronet R/T Convert Green 440 auto bought from original owner 1968 Charger R/T Bronze 440 4 spd console AM/FM 1969 Super Bee WM21H B5 A40 D21 N96 1969 Barracuda Formula S 340 Convert pilot car 1969 Hemi Road Runner RM23J D32 Omaha orange 4.10 Dana N96 N85 1970 Super Bee WM23N FE5 V1X 3.91 axle package, N96 1970 Road Runner RM21N B3 V1X D13 1971 MG Midget 1971 Road Runner RM23H GW3, A57 1972 Road Runner RM23P FY1, D21
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: sixpackbee]
#155776
12/01/08 04:41 PM
12/01/08 04:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411 Big Island ,VA
JC Childress
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 411
Big Island ,VA
|
Does anyone still sell the Port a Sonics or did they go out of business ?
Did ya'll test the adapted Chevy intakes as well ?
J.C. Childress
(434) 665-9541
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: sixpackbee]
#155777
12/01/08 04:49 PM
12/01/08 04:49 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,902 New Jersey Bada Bing
bremotorsports
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,902
New Jersey Bada Bing
|
![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/iagree.gif) This exactly what I found with similar testing. Also, on the 340 (72-73 Low Compression), the Holley Strip Dominator ran the same ET as the Victor, but the Victor was 1 mph faster. Bill Rolik
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: S/ST 3040]
#155778
12/25/08 09:10 PM
12/25/08 09:10 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595 On the south side of Nowhere
S/ST 3040
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
|
Quote:
I have a Magnum head that was donated to me for R&D, but, haven't persued yet.
#466 Casting 1.92" x 1.625"
Intake
.100"_____63.7 .200"____122.9 .300"____165.4 .400"____203.5 .480"____219.0 Peak .550"____203.1 .600"____201.9
Exhaust .100"_____51.6 .200"____109.0 .300"____148.9 .400"____159.7 .500"____166.3
Intake has my valve job using the factory valve. Exhaust was completely unmodified. It was done after .500"
As ugly as it is, it flows better than an unported LA head. I'll still take the 360 LA head for racing, as long as porting is allowed.
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: S/ST 3040]
#155779
12/26/08 12:38 PM
12/26/08 12:38 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 293 Kansas City Metro
mbogina
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 293
Kansas City Metro
|
when we ran the 71 Duster TQ combo in SS/IA, we also used the Holley Strip Dominator (modified/with spacers) for the best HP/TQ. I still feel the 71 Hi comp/small TQ/308 head combo is very viable when compared to the 360
Be a Rebel- Break the Laws of Physics!
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: S/ST 3040]
#155783
12/29/08 11:42 PM
12/29/08 11:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,515
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Vic, did you CC that intake runner?
they dont give you much to play with at all with the LA heads.
i did a VERY minor clean up on a 596 head, still used a tulip 1.88 valve.......barely flowed like 230cfm(flowed 195-ish OOTB with OE valve and OE VJ).....and it was 165cc's.......or, 5 cc's too big to be legal in SS.
what are some of the other magnum head casting numbers? i didnt see a "466" on the approved NHRA list.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#155784
12/29/08 11:55 PM
12/29/08 11:55 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595 On the south side of Nowhere
S/ST 3040
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
|
I did not cc the runner on this Magnum head. Only trying to see what all the fuss was on the these things and didn't want to give an unfounded opinion. So, I ate iron dust for an afternoon to see. I thought it was decent information to share. ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shruggy.gif) I'll try you at the shop tomorrow.
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: S/ST 3040]
#155785
12/30/08 08:44 PM
12/30/08 08:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,424 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,424
Kalispell Mt.
|
Have you looked at the old Ryan J ported magnums in the archives section? Looks like he did more work in the bowls and less in the PR pinch and got a little more flow that way. He got a hair more out of a stock set so that has to be considered but still he got around 270 ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shruggy.gif) might be worth a try.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: HotRodDave]
#155786
12/31/08 12:31 AM
12/31/08 12:31 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595 On the south side of Nowhere
S/ST 3040
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
|
Quote:
Have you looked at the old Ryan J ported magnums in the archives section? Looks like he did more work in the bowls and less in the PR pinch and got a little more flow that way. He got a hair more out of a stock set so that has to be considered but still he got around 270 might be worth a try.
I only did this to satisfy what little curiousity I had about the Magnum heads and now feel as I've educated myself well enough to stick with what I'm used to.
Despite the lack of "shine", I was pretty thorough and don't see this port getting much better. An R/T head might be a different story but, as a Super Stock head, I see a few disadvantages if these were legal.
|
|
|
Re: SS/HA 71' Duster am I doing this right ?
[Re: Dave Watt]
#155790
12/31/10 08:28 PM
12/31/10 08:28 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,898 Florida
Locomotion
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,898
Florida
|
Quote:
My neighbor Joe E. was running a '68 Dart in IHRA Crate Motor until the class went away. He converted it to an NHRA GT car with the '89 360 308 heads combo. The HP factor is pretty low from what I remember. Ran some 10.20's without much testing. It's still running 9" tires too.
Top Stock went away, not the regular IHRA Crate Motor classes.
Several people are putting a Challenger Drag Pak 360 Magnum into older cars for SS/GT. There were only 3 Challengers ordered with that engine in the first year of Drag Paks.But al it takes is one to make it legal. Soft HP factor so far.
|
|
|
|
|