Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Roadrunner451] #1533570
11/15/13 02:44 PM
11/15/13 02:44 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,421
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
Dragula Offline
I Live Here
Dragula  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,421
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
Pump goes in the tank....



'70 Cuda,...605 EFI Hemi Street Car (6.20 best pass, 1.33 60ft)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYw6RA-k5Bk (6.25 at 108.75mph from inside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zQEb9uxFng (6.25 at 108mph from outside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCvfzsC4NgM (9.9)

'66 Barracuda AWB Stretched nose Blown 440 Car in build stage

'71 Duster Drag Car 400 Low Deck 512 best 6.002 at 115.44mph
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znuo3jMUXTk
Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Dragula] #1533571
11/15/13 03:43 PM
11/15/13 03:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,001
Coram, NY
Pool Fixer Offline OP
master
Pool Fixer  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,001
Coram, NY
Quote:

Pump goes in the tank....






that set up is the deep end of the pool and I'm still in the dressing room putting on my swimmies lol

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Pool Fixer] #1533572
11/15/13 09:08 PM
11/15/13 09:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
Custom tanks with internal pumps are one way to do it. I found it more expensive, and most all the available tanks I've seen here and for sale on-line still won't perform well on a road course or even with spirited street driving with less than a 1/2 tank of fuel.

A better performing, generally less expensive system is a surge tank system. I went that route on my 1968 5.9 EFI conversion. I can run hard on the street or at Willow Springs until I get down to 1 1/2 gallons, at which point I fuel up again because I don't want to walk home. All that with a stock, unbaffled tank, a low and high pressure fuel pump and a surge tank.

Also, I used smaller fuel pumps and multiple fuel filters/water traps, so my current system is limited to about 450 hp. I ran 3/8ths feed and return lines and would have to use higher flow fuel filters and higher volume fuel pumps to go above that. The surge tank configuration that I'm using is limited to about 1300 hp with the right pumps etc.

7925503-SurgeTank.gif (130 downloads)

1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: jbc426] #1533573
11/15/13 09:53 PM
11/15/13 09:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
The main difference from this diagram and the surge tank set-up I went with, is that the EFI pump is actually inside the surge tank at the front of the car.

AND, from the surge tank back, it's essentially the same fuel system a lot of guys are already running with their carbureted systems. It's just a return-line fuel system with a low pressure electric pump pushing the fuel to the surge tank in the front of the car. It's simple to install, extremely effective and reasonably priced.

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: jbc426] #1533574
11/15/13 10:27 PM
11/15/13 10:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,001
Coram, NY
Pool Fixer Offline OP
master
Pool Fixer  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,001
Coram, NY
Quote:

The main difference from this diagram and the surge tank set-up I went with, is that the EFI pump is actually inside the surge tank at the front of the car.

AND, from the surge tank back, it's essentially the same fuel system a lot of guys are already running with their carbureted systems. It's just a return-line fuel system with a low pressure electric pump pushing the fuel to the surge tank in the front of the car. It's simple to install, extremely effective and reasonably priced.




ive researched it alot and i saw some other posts that you made and your setup is intriguing. ive seen that concept done a little differently using a large fuel filter for a "swirl pot" or "fuel accumulator"

7925590-image.jpg (65 downloads)
Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: jbc426] #1533575
11/15/13 10:28 PM
11/15/13 10:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,924
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,924
Ontario, Canada
Since pressure is relative to volume it seems to me that the high pressure pump in the surge tank would easily empty the tank before the low pressure pump could fill it up - particularly at high rpm.

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Stanton] #1533576
11/15/13 10:36 PM
11/15/13 10:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,001
Coram, NY
Pool Fixer Offline OP
master
Pool Fixer  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,001
Coram, NY
Quote:

Since pressure is relative to volume it seems to me that the high pressure pump in the surge tank would easily empty the tank before the low pressure pump could fill it up - particularly at high rpm.



thats one way to look at it. but....if your current setup fuels the motor properly, then efi shouldnt use any more fuel to make the same power. efi just requires the same amount fuel to be delvered differently....like an open ended garden hose vs same hose with a nozzle. same amount of water different pressure. how many times have we all unscrewed the nozzle to fill up the car wash bucket faster?

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Stanton] #1533577
11/15/13 10:51 PM
11/15/13 10:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
Quote:

Since pressure is relative to volume it seems to me that the high pressure pump in the surge tank would easily empty the tank before the low pressure pump could fill it up - particularly at high rpm.




The low side fills the surge tank at near zero psi at almost the full rated volume of pump flow and anything not used by the motor is sent back to the tank.

The high pressure side's bypass flows right back into the surge tank too. I suspect even at wide open throttle at max RPM, my high side pump is still bypassing a significant amount of fuel back into the surge tank.


1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Pool Fixer] #1533578
11/15/13 10:55 PM
11/15/13 10:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
Quote:

Quote:

The main difference from this diagram and the surge tank set-up I went with, is that the EFI pump is actually inside the surge tank at the front of the car.

AND, from the surge tank back, it's essentially the same fuel system a lot of guys are already running with their carbureted systems. It's just a return-line fuel system with a low pressure electric pump pushing the fuel to the surge tank in the front of the car. It's simple to install, extremely effective and reasonably priced.




ive researched it alot and i saw some other posts that you made and your setup is intriguing. ive seen that concept done a little differently using a large fuel filter for a "swirl pot" or "fuel accumulator"




Thanks, I studied both the tank modification route and this surge tank system route. After seeing what the "Tuner" guys were doing, I followed their lead. Their modern EFI cars come with pretty well designed fuel tanks with build in pumps, yet they still find them lacking and add surge tanks to enhance their fuel systems ability to provide an un-interrupted flow of fuel during hard driving.


1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: jbc426] #1533579
11/15/13 11:03 PM
11/15/13 11:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
The ideal system would use both a well-designed fully baffled tank with trap doors, modern road race style-multi point pick-ups and good filters and pumps all plumbed in a full-flow surge tank set-up with bypass regulator.

For what it's worth, these guys are at the leading edge of surge tank design and use.
http://www.radiumauto.com/
Using these types of products to retrofit older cars with modern EFI is worth some serious consideration given the cost and moderate performance of a custom fuel tank EFI system.

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: jbc426] #1533580
11/15/13 11:10 PM
11/15/13 11:10 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 598
NC, USA
D
davenc Offline
mopar
davenc  Offline
mopar
D

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 598
NC, USA
A surge tank makes a lot of sense to me, but one thing I wonder about is safety. The most logical place for the surge tank is right around the core support, which is pretty vulnerable in the even of a collision. I know the tank in the rear is vulnerable as well, but the OEM spent years study the safety aspects and have minimized a lot of risks.

Do you have any concerns about having 0.5-1 gallon of fuel sitting right by the front fender?

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: davenc] #1533581
11/15/13 11:19 PM
11/15/13 11:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,001
Coram, NY
Pool Fixer Offline OP
master
Pool Fixer  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,001
Coram, NY
Quote:



....Do you have any concerns about having 0.5-1 gallon of fuel sitting right by the front fender?




no more than i have with 200 lbs of half blind imbecile (me) sitting over the drivers floor lol

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Pool Fixer] #1533582
11/15/13 11:27 PM
11/15/13 11:27 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 598
NC, USA
D
davenc Offline
mopar
davenc  Offline
mopar
D

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 598
NC, USA
Nice!

I fully accept my own stupidity, its the stupidity of the other driver that I find a bit annoying.

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: davenc] #1533583
11/15/13 11:28 PM
11/15/13 11:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,289
West Coast, USA
Quote:

A surge tank makes a lot of sense to me, but one thing I wonder about is safety. The most logical place for the surge tank is right around the core support, which is pretty vulnerable in the even of a collision. I know the tank in the rear is vulnerable as well, but the OEM spent years study the safety aspects and have minimized a lot of risks.

Do you have any concerns about having 0.5-1 gallon of fuel sitting right by the front fender?




Fire is always a concern in a crash. The volume of these tanks when loaded with pumps is actually closer to a quart to a quart-and-a-half, and these surge tanks are pretty tough, a lot tougher than a sheet metal fuel tank for instance. Proper fuel line routing and components, low oil pressure shutoff switches and thoughtful electrical wiring are more areas to be concerned about.

So, do I worry about having this tank up front. I would worry more about having high pressure fuel lines plumbed from an aluminum tank running all the way up to the front of my car and back.


1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: jbc426] #1533584
11/16/13 12:06 AM
11/16/13 12:06 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 598
NC, USA
D
davenc Offline
mopar
davenc  Offline
mopar
D

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 598
NC, USA
"I would worry more about having high pressure fuel lines plumbed from an aluminum tank running all the way up to the front of my car and back."

Good points. The OEMs have the fuel cutoff covered but I would guess that most hobbyists do not. However, even if you had a fuel cutoff, the surge tank still presents a large volume of fuel to be spewed across a hot engine and exhaust in an impact.

Don't get me wrong, I really like the idea of the surge tank. I just like to think it through.

On a unrelated note, what would you think of using the mechanical pump for the low pressure side of the surge tank? That provides an immediate fuel cutoff, at least on the low pressure side, as soon as the engine stops. It also eliminates the need to run wiring to the rear of the car.

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: davenc] #1533585
11/16/13 12:54 AM
11/16/13 12:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,773
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,773
Bitopia
I installed on my 62 a ford impact fuel shutoff, I like the peace of mind, car also has low oil pressure shutoff also, both are easy to wire in. One day a pump in a minor shunt is going to pump a lot fuel before any attempt is made to extinguish the result, and it won't be pretty, and the the typical knee jerk over reaction will follow by the insurance companies and all politicos.


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: jcc] #1533586
11/16/13 01:02 AM
11/16/13 01:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
J
Jerry Offline
master
Jerry  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
there is nothing wrong with filling the surge tank with a mechanical pump. flow is flow whether it comes from a cam driven pump or an electric motor driven pump, as long as your mechanical pump can deliver the volume you need to keep your surge tank full you'll be fine.


Superior Design Concepts
2574 Elliott Dr
Troy MI 48083
jerry@sdconcepts.com
www.sdconcepts.com
Facebook page: Superior Design Concepts
www.bcrproducts.com
Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Jerry] #1533587
11/16/13 12:42 PM
11/16/13 12:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,924
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,924
Ontario, Canada
Quote:

Quote:

Since pressure is relative to volume it seems to me that the high pressure pump in the surge tank would easily empty the tank before the low pressure pump could fill it up - particularly at high rpm.


thats one way to look at it. but....if your current setup fuels the motor properly, then efi shouldnt use any more fuel to make the same power. efi just requires the same amount fuel to be delvered differently....like an open ended garden hose vs same hose with a nozzle. same amount of water different pressure. how many times have we all unscrewed the nozzle to fill up the car wash bucket faster?




Thanks for the explanation. Makes perfect sense.

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Stanton] #1533588
11/16/13 12:46 PM
11/16/13 12:46 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,924
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,924
Ontario, Canada
The surge tank idea makes sense, everything in the system can be left as is and just install the surge tank/pump up front.

Re: EFI in tank pump question [Re: Stanton] #1533589
11/16/13 03:01 PM
11/16/13 03:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Quote:

Since pressure is relative to volume it seems to me that the high pressure pump in the surge tank would easily empty the tank before the low pressure pump could fill it up - particularly at high rpm.




Pressure and volume are inversely proportional. As in volume goes down as pressure goes up.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1