Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Quicktree] #1524356
10/29/13 07:49 PM
10/29/13 07:49 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,049
ohio
A
all spooled up Offline
super stock
all spooled up  Offline
super stock
A

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,049
ohio
chased off a nuter one

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: all spooled up] #1524357
10/29/13 08:01 PM
10/29/13 08:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Q
Quicktree Offline
I Win
Quicktree  Offline
I Win
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quote:

chased off a nuter one


well if he is not man enough to stick around and explain a few things no big loss.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Quicktree] #1524358
10/29/13 08:51 PM
10/29/13 08:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
W
WHITEDART Offline
master
WHITEDART  Offline
master
W

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
Quote:

Quote:

chased off a nuter one


well if he is not man enough to stick around and explain a few things no big loss.




In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's
5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: B3RE] #1524359
10/29/13 09:25 PM
10/29/13 09:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Quote:

Here are the measurement and spec instructions, required for calculating correct geometry, that so many of you have requested.

1. Distance between the top of the rocker shaft and the top of the valve stem. Measure the distance between the combination square and the tip of the valve stem using a caliper, feeler gages, or other accurate measuring device. Be sure the square is resting on top of the rocker shaft and the blade is on the same angle as the valve stem. (See Photo)

2. Diameter of the rocker shaft and the roller tip of the rocker arm.

3. Rocker ratio being used.

4. Valve lift from cam card w/ 1.5 ratio rocker, or just lobe lift.

With these measurements and specs, you can contact me and I can let you know if correction is necessary, and supply you with the appropriate kit to make it perfect, guaranteed.

As always, I am happy to answer questions. I like questions.





Im not here to scare anybody.

But I believe the above requested info isnt enough to figure out anybodys rocker geometry.

IMO, one would also need to know the relationship between the "Roller tip and the Rockers body", along with the variable pushrod side of that Rocker.

As in, at a 90* angle to the valve is the roller center in the rocker body parrallel with the shafts center or is it offset up or down from that center.

Without knowing that, IMO, A absolute Geometry cant be figured out. Would I be correct??

Also, is absolute geometry really needed, for most purposes Im going to assume the rocker manufactures have it really close to begin with.

No doubt IMO, a really tight sweep of the roller tip is a good indicater of good geometry.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Sport440] #1524360
10/29/13 10:04 PM
10/29/13 10:04 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,905
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,905
Ontario, Canada
Quote:

Also, is absolute geometry really needed, for most purposes Im going to assume the rocker manufactures have it really close to begin with.




Really ?!?! You were sounding pretty smart for a while there but you've just dispelled that notion.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Sport440] #1524361
10/29/13 10:05 PM
10/29/13 10:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,285
okla.
sam64 Offline
pro stock
sam64  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,285
okla.
uh then why does andy f show so many differences in manufactures difference in design?do your research first.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Stanton] #1524362
10/29/13 10:18 PM
10/29/13 10:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Quote:

Quote:

Also, is absolute geometry really needed, for most purposes Im going to assume the rocker manufactures have it really close to begin with.




Really ?!?! You were sounding pretty smart for a while there but you've just dispelled that notion.




I hear you, but Im referring to the word "Absolute" Im sure many of us dont have it with our rocker arm/shaft/valve combos.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Sport440] #1524363
10/29/13 11:09 PM
10/29/13 11:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,069
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,069
Oregon
I think that most of the mfgs do a decent job figuring out the rocker arm geometry. The problem is that they don't tell people what the assumptions are behind the designs. Some rocker arms are designed to be stock replacements, some as race parts, some for stock heads, etc.

I spent my own money years ago to buy one rocker arm from every mfg possible so I could do my own measurements. I gradually figured out which arms worked with which heads and what lift ranges but it was a bit of a painful process.

I used to sell these rocker sweep tools. They do a good job of providing an engine builder with an actual number for the sweep. Without an actual measurement you're just kind of guessing at the results of a geometry change.

I've looked at the system that the OP sells and it doesn't make any sense to me. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't. I'm not going to buy one to test out. I'll let someone else do that job. I've tested enough parts over the years!

7905360-AR202.jpg (110 downloads)
Last edited by AndyF; 10/29/13 11:10 PM.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Crizila] #1524364
10/30/13 01:35 AM
10/30/13 01:35 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
rowin4 Offline
master
rowin4  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
Looking at the add pictures that he has on craigslist, it seems that the heads need machining for the shims to be installed. Looks like the shims themselves are ground offset in the picture to correct the geometry., but the heads need machining to do that as you can't put that thick of a shim under the shaft without splitting the shaft mount. Or you could use a smaller shaft, but that would require special rockers to replace the ones that are off. As for the bolt /studs in aluminum heads, I bought my ARP rocker shaft studs from Magnum for my Edelbrock RPM's 440 heads.


it's ok to butt heads, just don't do it with a butthead
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: rowin4] #1524365
10/30/13 08:59 AM
10/30/13 08:59 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 361
Canada
onig Offline
enthusiast
onig  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 361
Canada
This topic is very interesting as I am going through this process with a Pontiac stud rocker system. I have been doing some research to understand the theory.
The kit that B3RE sells will work. Those "shims/spacers" are machined to raise the shaft up the required amount to achieve the 90* angle to the valve at half lift. He also can move the shaft to the inside or outside if needed. From what I know each kit is custom made to your application from the specs that you give him.
I think that a lot of people will change rockers and not check for proper geometry. I used to think that proper geometry was having the roller centered on the valve, but not any more after looking into this somewhat.

Onig


69 Dart
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: onig] #1524366
10/30/13 09:55 AM
10/30/13 09:55 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Q
Quicktree Offline
I Win
Quicktree  Offline
I Win
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quote:

This topic is very interesting as I am going through this process with a Pontiac stud rocker system. I have been doing some research to understand the theory.
The kit that B3RE sells will work. Those "shims/spacers" are machined to raise the shaft up the required amount to achieve the 90* angle to the valve at half lift. He also can move the shaft to the inside or outside if needed. From what I know each kit is custom made to your application from the specs that you give him.
I think that a lot of people will change rockers and not check for proper geometry. I used to think that proper geometry was having the roller centered on the valve, but not any more after looking into this somewhat.

Onig


I think everyone will agree with that. a different approach would have went over a lot better.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Quicktree] #1524367
10/30/13 10:20 AM
10/30/13 10:20 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,410
Belpre,Ohio
C
CHAPPER Offline
master
CHAPPER  Offline
master
C

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,410
Belpre,Ohio
Quote:

heck i would just like him to introduce himself




Maybe you should try one of the online dating sites,,,he's not the only guy out there.


If you like drag racing, support your local track.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: CHAPPER] #1524368
10/30/13 10:56 AM
10/30/13 10:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,354
Aurora, Oh.
M
max_maniac Offline
master
max_maniac  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,354
Aurora, Oh.
Quote:

Quote:

heck i would just like him to introduce himself




Maybe you should try one of the online dating sites,,,he's not the only guy out there.








Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: max_maniac] #1524369
10/30/13 11:08 AM
10/30/13 11:08 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,905
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,905
Ontario, Canada
Quote:

Quote:

heck i would just like him to introduce himself



Maybe you should try one of the online dating sites,,,he's not the only guy out there.




LMAO !!!

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: CHAPPER] #1524370
10/30/13 12:14 PM
10/30/13 12:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Q
Quicktree Offline
I Win
Quicktree  Offline
I Win
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quote:

Quote:

heck i would just like him to introduce himself




Maybe you should try one of the online dating sites,,,he's not the only guy out there.


I am sure your homo friends will get a laugh out of that

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Quicktree] #1524371
10/30/13 05:39 PM
10/30/13 05:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 739
Florida
4
408Dust Offline
super stock
408Dust  Offline
super stock
4

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 739
Florida
I am sure your homo friends will get a laugh out of that

Thought you Obama supporters were OK with that stuff

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Sport440] #1524372
10/30/13 08:16 PM
10/30/13 08:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Also, is absolute geometry really needed, for most purposes Im going to assume the rocker manufactures have it really close to begin with.




Really ?!?! You were sounding pretty smart for a while there but you've just dispelled that notion.




I hear you, but Im referring to the word "Absolute" Im sure many of us dont have it with our rocker arm/shaft/valve combos.


Like everything else in our hobby, there is rarely an absolute right way. It usually involves a trade-off of some kind. In this case, the trade-off seems to involve centering the roller on the valve tip, which often does not lead to "perfect" valve train geometry. Due to the smaller contact patch with roller tip rockers ( verses scrub type rockers ), I personally am willing to sacrifice "some" geometry to be able to get the largest roller tip contact patch ( middle of valve stem). This also helps in the valve stem wear dept. On the down side I am probably sacrificing some area under the curve.


Fastest 300
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Crizila] #1524373
10/30/13 08:20 PM
10/30/13 08:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,423
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,423
Kalispell Mt.
Maybe some of you guys should look at that guys kit, it moves the shaft up to correct geometry and back to center the contact patch, the only compromise I see is the PR geometry will get worse, not a big deal on a BB but a SB is already bad. Of course a W2 is worstest yet and they can rev good so


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: HotRodDave] #1524374
10/30/13 08:23 PM
10/30/13 08:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Q
Quicktree Offline
I Win
Quicktree  Offline
I Win
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
never been a fan of shimming the rocker shaft and never had any issues with geometry. are they perfect probably not but I don't really care.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: HotRodDave] #1524375
10/30/13 08:31 PM
10/30/13 08:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Quote:

Maybe some of you guys should look at that guys kit, it moves the shaft up to correct geometry and back to center the contact patch, the only compromise I see is the PR geometry will get worse, not a big deal on a BB but a SB is already bad. Of course a W2 is worstest yet and they can rev good so


That's fine if you are running shafts, but I'm running rocker studs and off-set drilling them aint happening.


Fastest 300
Page 4 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1