made some headway on my 60'
#1509866
09/30/13 08:53 AM
09/30/13 08:53 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,124 Mt Morris Michigan
mopar dave
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,124
Mt Morris Michigan
|
went to a different track yesterday(midmichigandragway) and made some improvements on my 60's. only difference to car was a new ICE ignition box & coil. best 60 to date was a 1.51 with the cal-tracs. first 2 back to back passes 1.499,1.468. bars in lower hole. john calvert says aslong as your not spinning going to the upper hole will not improve 60'. I put the bars in the upper hole and 1.456,1.473,1.468. shocks on 7. shock on 9 1.488. so what do ya think? upper hole or lower hole? best of the day was [Email]10.47@128.9[/Email]
Last edited by mopar dave; 09/30/13 08:55 AM.
|
|
|
Re: made some headway on my 60'
[Re: mopar dave]
#1509867
09/30/13 10:12 AM
09/30/13 10:12 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160 Texas
dannysbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
|
Make some shock changes on the lower hole then draw a conclusion.
Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.
|
|
|
Re: made some headway on my 60'
[Re: mopar dave]
#1509870
09/30/13 11:55 AM
09/30/13 11:55 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,178 Indy
FlyFish
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,178
Indy
|
Nice Dave! I also made improvements on mine as well this weekend, but mine is due to a fresh transmission, 1.47 60', 6.81 1/8. My Caltracs are still on the lower hole, 1 flat driver side, 2 flats passenger side, shocks on 6.
67 Barracuda street car, 408, e85, 1.38 60', 6.44 @105.9 in the 1/8 mile, 10.19 @130.5 in the 1/4...so far....
|
|
|
Re: made some headway on my 60'
[Re: mopar dave]
#1509872
09/30/13 01:12 PM
09/30/13 01:12 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160 Texas
dannysbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
|
I would log 10 passes in the upper and lower hole at the best shock settings & go with the best average.
Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.
|
|
|
Re: made some headway on my 60'
[Re: mopar dave]
#1509874
09/30/13 02:20 PM
09/30/13 02:20 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160 Texas
dannysbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
|
Your mph was down 3mph. Air was probably the hp difference. Et would have been worse if your 60 had not picked up.
Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.
|
|
|
Re: made some headway on my 60'
[Re: mopar dave]
#1509876
10/01/13 08:47 AM
10/01/13 08:47 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
Taking time off to work on my car
|
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Quote:
... john calvert says aslong as your not spinning going to the upper hole will not improve 60'.
I'd take that as a generality and tune for what works best for your car. I've never tried the upper hole position on my Challenger, but it's nose-heavy compared to your car and IMO the lower position helps w/ the weight distribution.
|
|
|
Re: made some headway on my 60'
[Re: ajcasini]
#1509881
10/01/13 10:26 AM
10/01/13 10:26 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,703 Mohnton, Pa
DodgeCharger
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,703
Mohnton, Pa
|
Quote:
Guys I fought this 60' battle with my roadrunner last year. Car was 60' 1.44-1.48 wih caltracs and rancho 9way shocks. Car would begin to lift just as some are describing then give a wiggle and set the tires down 10-15' off the line. Was causing et variation on the top end from 10.38-10.45. Changed rear shocks to qa1 double adjustable. First weekend out car was a different animal on the line. 1.37-1.38 60' time et 10.30-10.32. The best improvement was consistency though. 60' stayed glued in thr 1.37-1.38 range thus et was much more consistent. Once you get to a certain power level the rancho/Calvert 9way shocks just aren't up to the task.
This is what worked forme.
Can you post a link or part number for the shocks your talking about? What do they cost?
|
|
|
|
|