I think that something is being overlooked here and that is crank rod pin diameter. BBM's have a fairly large 2.375" rod journal which means the bearing speed is higher than that of a BBC's 2.200" journal. Larger journals requires more oil to keep them happy, perhaps why a narrow, full groove main tends to keep a big mopar alive longer. Were you to go to the BBC rod journal, I would suggest going to the 3/4 groove main. As long as the rod is getting oil pressure when it needs it most; ie, under the power stroke, it should be just fine. Ok, just did a little studying of two actual crankshafts, one is a Bryant for an R5 engine and the other is a Scat 4" for a 360. Both oil the same and with a 3/4 groove bearing, the rod won't have oil flowing to the bearing during compression and exhaust cycles. It starts to get oil just about at TDC as close as I can tell. Not sure what this is telling me, sure some engineers could explain it, but I know that the most pressure in the cylinder happens shortly after TDC (unless there's preignition detonation) so with the proper bearing clearances and rod side clearance the oil film is sufficient. Another thing I find interesting is that the oil feed hole to the rod starts feeding the rod bearing after it has cleared the top of the bearing and is at about 3:00 or so. So what this tells me is that having proper bearing clearance and rod side clearance along with proper oil viscosity is very important. Also that rod pin diameter could play a part in whether or not you want to run full groove mains or not.
Found this article interesting: (focused mostly on the cross-drilling portion, though the rest of the article is a pretty good read)
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/tech/e...ts/viewall.html