Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: VoodooCLD] #1263911
07/11/12 04:03 PM
07/11/12 04:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 369
California, USA!!!
W
WheelsUp73 Offline
enthusiast
WheelsUp73  Offline
enthusiast
W

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 369
California, USA!!!
There are alot of sleeper cars around. Here is a friend of mine in his street driven mustang. This is a test run he made at the track.
He runs a smallblock ford and a procharger.He did not put the pedal to the floor till about 200 feet out. He ran over 175 mph in the qtr mile on this pass and that is a 3000# car.
http://youtu.be/87IBgWOrRBM

Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: WheelsUp73] #1263912
07/11/12 04:29 PM
07/11/12 04:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,797
Mt.Gilead, Ohio
OhioMopar Offline
master
OhioMopar  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,797
Mt.Gilead, Ohio
Fast, but I think the huge cowl hood, parachute, wing and mag wheels eliminate it from 'sleeper' catagory...


1969 Dart GTS 340
1969 Coronet R/T X9 N-96
1999 Dodge Dakota R/T RC
2015 Dodge Dart GT
2019 Ram 2500 Big Horn
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: WheelsUp73] #1263913
07/11/12 04:34 PM
07/11/12 04:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
El Dorado Ca
6
65signet Offline
mopar
65signet  Offline
mopar
6

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
El Dorado Ca
Sleeper's should not have power adders, i think it is more impressive without some big turbo or procharger hanging off the motor. JMO


1965 Plymouth Barracuda 273 M/SA
1970 Plymouth Duster 360/904 10.60s with J heads
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: 65signet] #1263914
07/11/12 04:36 PM
07/11/12 04:36 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Quote:

Sleeper's should not have power adders, i think it is more impressive without some big turbo or procharger hanging off the motor. JMO


THANK YOU............I agree for the most part and fast n/a has WAY more merit then the power adders.


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: Thumperdart] #1263915
07/11/12 04:45 PM
07/11/12 04:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 369
California, USA!!!
W
WheelsUp73 Offline
enthusiast
WheelsUp73  Offline
enthusiast
W

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 369
California, USA!!!
Say what you want but turbos and prochargers are here to stay.He does not cruise the streets with a parachute.It is a track rule if you go over 150 you need to have a chute on the car. My point is there alot of fast cars out there. I see 2 power adders on that nova. Don't be a hater because your crap is slow.

Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: 65signet] #1263916
07/11/12 05:14 PM
07/11/12 05:14 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646
Plymouth Meeting, PA
bigtimeauto Offline
Trophy Winner
bigtimeauto  Offline
Trophy Winner

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646
Plymouth Meeting, PA
Quote:

Sleeper's should not have power adders, i think it is more impressive without some big turbo or procharger hanging off the motor. JMO




then its not a sleeper its just slow


BB, TT5,Procharged 3300lb Street Car 4.79/154
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: bigtimeauto] #1263917
07/11/12 06:00 PM
07/11/12 06:00 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Quote:

Quote:

Sleeper's should not have power adders, i think it is more impressive without some big turbo or procharger hanging off the motor. JMO




then its not a sleeper its just slow


Don`t get me wrong here, I`m blown away by turbos and the power they can produce but if you think about it, they SHOULD haul ass cos they`re expected to. N/a cars can only be so fast w/out high end money and parts which I`m short on these days so, slow n/a for me for now.


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: 65signet] #1263918
07/11/12 08:23 PM
07/11/12 08:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
OUTLAWD Offline
top fuel
OUTLAWD  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
Quote:

Sleeper's should not have power adders




Not sure that having a power adder makes the car look faster...what is under a closed hood, is under a closed hood


Faster, Faster until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...

71 Swinger - slowly collecting dust/parts
66 Belv. II - just a streetcar
88 Mustang - turbo LS beater
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: WheelsUp73] #1263919
07/11/12 08:36 PM
07/11/12 08:36 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,366
Lehigh Acres, Florida
rickstershemi Offline
master
rickstershemi  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,366
Lehigh Acres, Florida
Quote:

Say what you want but turbos and prochargers are here to stay.He does not cruise the streets with a parachute.It is a track rule if you go over 150 you need to have a chute on the car. My point is there alot of fast cars out there. I see 2 power adders on that nova. Don't be a hater because your crap is slow.





^^^^^^^ Ahhh....someone has a clue ^^^^^^^

Rickster

Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: Thumperdart] #1263920
07/11/12 08:58 PM
07/11/12 08:58 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646
Plymouth Meeting, PA
bigtimeauto Offline
Trophy Winner
bigtimeauto  Offline
Trophy Winner

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646
Plymouth Meeting, PA
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Sleeper's should not have power adders, i think it is more impressive without some big turbo or procharger hanging off the motor. JMO




then its not a sleeper its just slow


Don`t get me wrong here, I`m blown away by turbos and the power they can produce but if you think about it, they SHOULD haul ass cos they`re expected to. N/a cars can only be so fast w/out high end money and parts which I`m short on these days so, slow n/a for me for now.




I'm glad i don't have a turbo so i didn't get grouped into that statement.


BB, TT5,Procharged 3300lb Street Car 4.79/154
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: Thumperdart] #1263921
07/12/12 12:12 AM
07/12/12 12:12 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 793
Utah
topbrent Offline
super stock
topbrent  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 793
Utah
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Sleeper's should not have power adders, i think it is more impressive without some big turbo or procharger hanging off the motor. JMO




then its not a sleeper its just slow


Don`t get me wrong here, I`m blown away by turbos and the power they can produce but if you think about it, they SHOULD haul ass cos they`re expected to. N/a cars can only be so fast w/out high end money and parts which I`m short on these days so, slow n/a for me for now.




All these arbitrary rules as to what constitutes a sleeper....sheesh!

So, if the turbo car is built with a junkyard engine, no high end parts, doesn't look fast, is super quiet, doesn't cost a lot to replicate, and yet it still runs solid mid 9's at 144mph... can it still be a real sleeper?

Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: topbrent] #1263922
07/12/12 01:45 AM
07/12/12 01:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 867
Bellevue, NE
C
Charger453 Offline
super stock
Charger453  Offline
super stock
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 867
Bellevue, NE
A bunch of haters in this thread...

Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: 65signet] #1263923
07/12/12 09:42 AM
07/12/12 09:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Sleeper's should not have power adders, i think it is more impressive without some big turbo or procharger hanging off the motor. JMO




w/o boost it's almost impossible to have a "sleeper"/driver. To do it N/A you'll need tons of cubic inches, very very expensive heads, a big bumpity bumb cam, big stall and tall gear. Boost eliminates the need for all of that.

Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: Mr.Yuck] #1263924
07/12/12 09:54 AM
07/12/12 09:54 AM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 460
Oklahoma
V
VoodooCLD Offline
mopar
VoodooCLD  Offline
mopar
V

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 460
Oklahoma
Agreed that the turbo and super chargers will make a really powerful unsuspecting car. Only problem is, i can hear a charger from a mile away. The beans are spoiled as soon as you hit the gas.

Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: Charger453] #1263925
07/12/12 10:02 AM
07/12/12 10:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,866
North of Detroit
HemiDart68 Offline
master
HemiDart68  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,866
North of Detroit
Quote:

A bunch of haters in this thread...




word... I was under the impression was a sleeper was simply a car that is wayyy faster then it appears. I didn't realize it had a million other constraints....

Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: VoodooCLD] #1263926
07/12/12 10:13 AM
07/12/12 10:13 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Agreed that the turbo and super chargers will make a really powerful unsuspecting car. Only problem is, i can hear a charger from a mile away. The beans are spoiled as soon as you hit the gas.




some do some don't. I had a paxton that was quiet. Only thing you heard was the pssssssst when the BOV opened after you got out of it. Plenty of new Mustangs running boost that you can't hear. Does the Nova look like it could run 8's? Not until you open the hood, but then again I'd never be dumb enough to race somebody for money w/o knowing exactly what they had. Apples to apples not apples to doughnuts.

Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: HemiDart68] #1263927
07/12/12 10:50 AM
07/12/12 10:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,686
Mt. Eden Ky.
Hemi Allstate Offline
master
Hemi Allstate  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,686
Mt. Eden Ky.
Quote:

Quote:

A bunch of haters in this thread... [/quot

I was under the impression was a sleeper was simply a car that is wayyy faster then it appears. I didn't realize it had a million other constraints....





That would be my definition too!



1996 Ram 1500 Sport
1968 road runner
1952 Sears Allstate licensed, pump gas, Hemi 5.98 @ 115.73 1.33 60 ft. The best is yet to come. Painless Performance / Street RODDER magazine Top 100 for 2019
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: bigtimeauto] #1263928
07/12/12 01:24 PM
07/12/12 01:24 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Sleeper's should not have power adders, i think it is more impressive without some big turbo or procharger hanging off the motor. JMO




then its not a sleeper its just slow


Don`t get me wrong here, I`m blown away by turbos and the power they can produce but if you think about it, they SHOULD haul ass cos they`re expected to. N/a cars can only be so fast w/out high end money and parts which I`m short on these days so, slow n/a for me for now.




I'm glad i don't have a turbo so i didn't get grouped into that statement.


Sorry you feel picked on as I was about my "slow ass car" whatever............your car is bad ass no denying that. I`ve been watching several P.S.C.A. guys for years set the racing world on fire and watched Jason Pettis build these monsters first hand when I worked there so this isn`t my first rodeo and if I had the cash I too could have an 8-second streeter but, n/a works for me..............and of course my "slo ass car"............so who`s the REAL hater here.........sure ain`t me.


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: Mr.Yuck] #1263929
07/12/12 02:29 PM
07/12/12 02:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
El Dorado Ca
6
65signet Offline
mopar
65signet  Offline
mopar
6

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
El Dorado Ca
Quote:

Quote:

Sleeper's should not have power adders, i think it is more impressive without some big turbo or procharger hanging off the motor. JMO




w/o boost it's almost impossible to have a "sleeper"/driver. To do it N/A you'll need tons of cubic inches, very very expensive heads, a big bumpity bumb cam, big stall and tall gear. Boost eliminates the need for all of that.





I have seen plenty of small cubic inch N/A motors, going really quick in super stock and comp elim, i saw a barracuda with a N/A 383 go 9.70 dragging the bumper with a AVS for a carb.


1965 Plymouth Barracuda 273 M/SA
1970 Plymouth Duster 360/904 10.60s with J heads
Re: So you think you have a sleeper [Re: VoodooCLD] #1263930
07/12/12 05:41 PM
07/12/12 05:41 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,339
somwhere
S
smokinwoody Offline OP
I Live Here
smokinwoody  Offline OP
I Live Here
S

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,339
somwhere
Quote:

Agreed that the turbo and super chargers will make a really powerful unsuspecting car. Only problem is, i can hear a charger from a mile away. The beans are spoiled as soon as you hit the gas.




for the 10 second crowd....not until after I hammered it...of course mine wasn't built to look like a sleep either although I had many a "kid" try and sucker me into a race until they asked to see whats under the hood...

Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1