Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#125448
09/29/08 09:40 PM
09/29/08 09:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,570 San Francisco Ca
SCATPK
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,570
San Francisco Ca
|
Quote:
SKATPAK,
All due respect, nobody is arguing that headers will out perform factory manifolds, of course they will, especially a warmed over engine. The question is, how much gain will Extrude Honed factory castings offer over untouched castings, and is (whatever that gain is) worth it?
Scott, it seemed that the original poster was considering going with headers and I just posted an actual comparison between the 2 different setups. No doubt that headers make a big difference in a warmed over engine! But in my opinion the extrude process is not worth the money for the small gain if any.
|
|
|
Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#125450
09/30/08 11:01 AM
09/30/08 11:01 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,446 Indiana
YO7_A66
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,446
Indiana
|
I just reviewed the article in Mopar Muscle when they dynoed the 7 different exhaust manifold/header combos and I am still surprised that the TTI's were only +16 ft/lbs and + 12 hp over the 70 HP units on the mild small block. I know that the numbers will go up as a motor gets more modified, but I am still trying to justify the price of the TTi's (apx $740) and the Doug's (apx $550) and the Extrude Hone (apx $675 + shipping) for only 16ft/lbs and 12 hp maximum gains.
I just want to thank everyone again for their replies and their experiences on this subject.
1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger 340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
|
|
|
Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: YO7_A66]
#125451
09/30/08 11:17 AM
09/30/08 11:17 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,338 A gulag near you.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,338
A gulag near you.
|
Quote:
I just reviewed the article in Mopar Muscle when they dynoed the 7 different exhaust manifold/header combos and I am still surprised that the TTI's were only +16 ft/lbs and + 12 hp over the 70 HP units on the mild small block. I know that the numbers will go up as a motor gets more modified, but I am still trying to justify the price of the TTi's (apx $740) and the Doug's (apx $550) and the Extrude Hone (apx $675 + shipping) for only 16ft/lbs and 12 hp maximum gains.
I just want to thank everyone again for their replies and their experiences on this subject.
Well if you BELIEVE what Extrude told you you'll see the same increase from their process as the TTi's ...
|
|
|
Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: YO7_A66]
#125452
09/30/08 11:20 AM
09/30/08 11:20 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160 Texas
dannysbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
|
Your High Performance Mopar engines were blessed with a nice set of free flowing manifolds from the factory. For 99% of the street strip cars they will be more than adequite just the way Mopar made them. If it were me and looking for a little more performance I would concentrate down stream from the manifolds with a nice 2 1/2" mandrel bent exhaust with a x pipe and large free flowing mufflers. I looked at you engine specs and looks like you have a nice combo. I also noticed you didn't mention any head work. If your heads are basically stock a good port and valve job from a reputable shop would probably give some good bang for the buck.
Last edited by dannysbee; 09/30/08 11:36 AM.
Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.
|
|
|
Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: dannysbee]
#125453
09/30/08 11:34 AM
09/30/08 11:34 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,446 Indiana
YO7_A66
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,446
Indiana
|
Danny, I an currently running 2-1/4" pipes with an H pipe, and two 440/Hemi style mufflers. John, I do not believe the Extrude Hone information and I was just passing on information to the board. Thank you for the replies.
1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger 340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
|
|
|
Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: dannysbee]
#125456
09/30/08 12:29 PM
09/30/08 12:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,446 Indiana
YO7_A66
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,446
Indiana
|
Dan, I have already had the heads pocket ported along with the 3 angle valve job. Hopefully one of the FAST guys will chime in on some small block muffler choices. Thank you again. Scott, PLEASE check back in with us with your results and thank you for your efforts!
1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger 340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
|
|
|
Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#125459
10/01/08 06:08 AM
10/01/08 06:08 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978 Bethel Ct
AdamR
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
|
Quote:
Folks I will post a real world comparison next week. I have a set of untouched factory 71 A-body 340 manifolds as well as an identical set that have been Extrude Honed, both will be tested on the same engine with no changes and the same pair of exhaust pipe extensions. Keep in mind that any gains (or lack of) may vary with ANY engine combo, it's all about where the engines "bottlenecks" are, if it's the exhaust manifolds (which is what I expect mine will be) you might see a bigger gain with EH manifolds, in my case will will soon see.
Scott, anyway you can test a 68-71 passenger side manifold Vs your 71 passenger unit ?
|
|
|
Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#125461
10/01/08 10:52 AM
10/01/08 10:52 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,982 Ansonia, CT
CJK440
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,982
Ansonia, CT
|
I think thats the same pass side manifold my 72 has and I'm going to guess the only difference between the 71 and 72 drivers casting is the addition of that large rib on top. The rest looks the same.
People have told me 71's have a better set of manifolds than a 72 and I don't see why.
2017 Contusion Blue Challenger T/A 392 M6 "BLKNBLU"
|
|
|
Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#125463
10/01/08 11:20 AM
10/01/08 11:20 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160 Texas
dannysbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
|
The 71 manifolds look better but have no performance advantage. My buddy changed the 72 ps manifold to a 68-70 PS manifold and saw no measurable improvement. This was in a stock cubic inch 12 second car.
Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.
|
|
|
Re: Anyone Use Extrude Hone for Exhaust Manifolds?
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#125464
10/01/08 12:46 PM
10/01/08 12:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,227 New Mexico
UCUDANT
Troll Hunter
|
Troll Hunter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,227
New Mexico
|
Quote:
I agree, I have examples of both, PS 71 vs 72 I can see zero difference, also no difference betwen DS 71's and 72's in regards to internal shape.
Compare the shape of the drivers side upper/outer corner. The 72 is definately different externally, have you CC'd them for an internal comparison?
|
|
|
|
|