Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant #1234464
05/16/12 03:44 PM
05/16/12 03:44 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
This afternoon I tried to wrestle the 451/Lakewood/A833, front motor plate and B-body Hedmans into the '72 Dart, for several hours... it will NOT go in. Even if I had a giant shoehorn and some Astroglide!

I tried many combinations of header location in the compartment before wondering if the headers weren't the only problem. Finally I tried leaving out the headers entirely and just lowering the drivetrain, and found that my deep oil pan won't clear the K-member by at least two or three inches with the heads butted up against the firewall - it's a front-sump and I need a center-sump pan. Oh well, it's just MORE money and hassle :P

Now I know why I haven't tried a B-block A-body in nearly 30 years... but this IS fun, isn't it?

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: DrCharles] #1234465
05/16/12 03:53 PM
05/16/12 03:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,837
Castlegar, BC, Canada
That AMC Guy Offline
master
That AMC Guy  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,837
Castlegar, BC, Canada
I can only assume it's like putting a V8 in the Hornet/Gremlin series. It will eventually go in, but it's a tight fit!


Bloody Mary, Full of Vodka, Blessed art thou among cocktails....

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: DrCharles] #1234466
05/16/12 03:55 PM
05/16/12 03:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,080
organ
M
maximum entropy Offline
master
maximum entropy  Offline
master
M

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,080
organ
it's been done. have fun.


for what is the good life if not doing things thoughtfully?
Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: maximum entropy] #1234467
05/16/12 04:00 PM
05/16/12 04:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291
Kent, Wa
340SHORTY Offline
Truck Nut
340SHORTY  Offline
Truck Nut

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291
Kent, Wa
How do you plan on making the B body headers fit ?


I am truckless..
Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: DrCharles] #1234468
05/16/12 04:05 PM
05/16/12 04:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,228
Colleyville
3hundred Offline
I Live Here
3hundred  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,228
Colleyville
As a C body guy, I shouldn't tell you this, but you need a C body pan. Milodon used to make a nice deep pan that would work, don't know about anything aftermarket currently.

Robert


'68 Fury Convertible
'69 300 Convertible
'15 Durango 5.7 Hemi
'16 300 S Hemi
Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: 340SHORTY] #1234469
05/16/12 04:11 PM
05/16/12 04:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481
Chino Valley
RodStRace Offline
I Live Here
RodStRace  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481
Chino Valley
I'd pull all steering linkage but leave the box in.
I'd test fit from underneath without the motor plate (and K frame).
I have no idea where you got a front sump. Trucks use rear sump, cars use mid sump.
I'd also be prepared for clutch linkage issues and have a mini starter already fitted to the engine before install.
Take a look at bigblockdart.com for more info.
I don't know if a BB/scattershield/4 speed and headers will require very specific parts, but they would know the best combos.

I'd also have a grinder, torch and big hammer close by!

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: 3hundred] #1234470
05/16/12 04:11 PM
05/16/12 04:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Last time I did this (383 in a '76 Valiant) I used a Moroso 7-qt pan... don't remember the part number though.

It seems I actually do have a so-called "center sump" pan (the $80 Chinese ones that 440source and ebayers sell). But it's not actually dead center, which would have cleared the k-frame.

Will look for C-body deep pans, thanks for the tip.

Re: B-body headers, check the BBD tech pages . In fact this is the same set that was used in the pics (I bought them from Darrin a while back).

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: 340SHORTY] #1234471
05/16/12 04:13 PM
05/16/12 04:13 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 77
Cement Under Ground
666 Offline
member
666  Offline
member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 77
Cement Under Ground
Again with the Headers. They are for a B Body or does Hedman say they were fit. The front motor plate does make a little more room for headers clearance. My Uncle used CPPA headers a long time ago and they fit nicely. They are a Chassis header, and you do not need to cut holes in the inner fenders.I do not know if you can buy those headers new any more. Hookers were fenderwell headers and needed cutting. The oil pan, I think my uncle used a hemi pan, I could be wrong but someone will post what pan you will need.

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: DrCharles] #1234472
05/16/12 04:27 PM
05/16/12 04:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Quote:

..... front motor plate.....
my deep oil pan won't clear the K-member .... I need a center-sump pan. Oh well, it's just MORE money and hassle :P

Now I know why I haven't tried a B-block A-body in nearly 30 years... but this IS fun, isn't it?




I thought that one of the advantages of using a motor plate is to eliminate the K member/engine attachment issue? The factory k member& engine mounts, as well as the trans mount are responsible for the fore/aft location of the engine and trans. When you deviate from stock, these kinds of fitment issues are sure to happen.
I've found that a majority of car applications require a mid sump oil pan when using the stock k member.

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: Kern Dog] #1234473
05/16/12 04:42 PM
05/16/12 04:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Thanks, but as I posted above, it's actually a center sump pan. Even so, the sump is too far forward.

Also, my engine will sit in the stock position (since I'm using the original trans mount, it has to). The front plate is for header clearance, not to relocate my engine...

This may be a stupid question, but is it possible that I put the pan on backwards? Or do they only go on one way...

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: DrCharles] #1234474
05/16/12 04:46 PM
05/16/12 04:46 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,446
NJ-USA
H
HPMike Offline
master
HPMike  Offline
master
H

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,446
NJ-USA
Quote:

Thanks, but as I posted above, it's actually a center sump pan. Even so, the sump is too far forward.

Also, my engine will sit in the stock position (since I'm using the original trans mount, it has to). The front plate is for header clearance, not to relocate my engine...

This may be a stupid question, but is it possible that I put the pan on backwards? Or do they only go on one way...




It only goes on one way,....

I use a Milodon, but you still need to make a notch for steering linkage clearance. TTI headers should work fine.

MB

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: DrCharles] #1234475
05/16/12 04:51 PM
05/16/12 04:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,664
Newfoundland
M
mopar_man Offline
master
mopar_man  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,664
Newfoundland
I have done the A body RB block change about 8-9 times . used a 400 base pan with center sump . i also cut off some of the lip on the k member and then mig welded it. I also bent back the lip on fire wall/floor pan to give transmission a bit more clearance. Always went with Hp manifolds as I hate headers. Make sure engine is set as low as possible because you could have some clearance issues with carb /breather / hood. may have to use shorter spacer on fan depending what rad you have. Good Luck .

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: DrCharles] #1234476
05/16/12 04:52 PM
05/16/12 04:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,228
Colleyville
3hundred Offline
I Live Here
3hundred  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,228
Colleyville
Quote:

Thanks, but as I posted above, it's actually a center sump pan. Even so, the sump is too far forward.




Sounds like a B body pan, the C body pan is cut back more to the passenger side IIRC. 187 and 699 are the numbers I recall if you want a stock pan.

Robert


'68 Fury Convertible
'69 300 Convertible
'15 Durango 5.7 Hemi
'16 300 S Hemi
Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: mopar_man] #1234477
05/16/12 05:00 PM
05/16/12 05:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Quote:

I have done the A body RB block change about 8-9 times . used a 400 base pan with center sump . i also cut off some of the lip on the k member and then mig welded it. I also bent back the lip on fire wall/floor pan to give transmission a bit more clearance. Always went with Hp manifolds as I hate headers. Make sure engine is set as low as possible because you could have some clearance issues with carb /breather / hood. may have to use shorter spacer on fan depending what rad you have. Good Luck .




Thanks for the hints. The last two times I did this swap, I did not have to cut or modify the k-member (or the pan either)... I wish I could remember which Moroso pan I used!

The stock pan even with a mild 383 would lose oil pressure on a vigorous launch, so I definitely want a 7-qt pan for the 451...

I have already hammered the lip in the tunnel flat, otherwise it wouldn't clear the scattershield

Planning on electric fan, and it's still going to be tight, but I have to get the beast under the hood first

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: DrCharles] #1234478
05/16/12 05:08 PM
05/16/12 05:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,664
Newfoundland
M
mopar_man Offline
master
mopar_man  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,664
Newfoundland
putting a B engine in a A bod should be easier , all I have done are RB s which are even tighter.

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: mopar_man] #1234479
05/16/12 06:01 PM
05/16/12 06:01 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
I tried it once with a 440... that's why I stroked a 400 this time

Here's what I'm up against. You can see there's no way the pan will clear the k-frame even if I trimmed the lip. The valve covers are touching the firewall.


Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: DrCharles] #1234480
05/16/12 06:08 PM
05/16/12 06:08 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,324
Ohio
J
jlatessa Offline
pro stock
jlatessa  Offline
pro stock
J

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,324
Ohio
Try the engine without the trans, it looks like maybe if the engine is more level you might have a better chance.

Joe

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: jlatessa] #1234481
05/16/12 06:12 PM
05/16/12 06:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481
Chino Valley
RodStRace Offline
I Live Here
RodStRace  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481
Chino Valley
Quote:

Try the engine without the trans, it looks like maybe if the engine is more level you might have a better chance.

Joe




I agree, and you want to have the wiring for that starter on and tight to A. check for clearance. B. So you do not have to install after the headers are on.

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: jlatessa] #1234482
05/16/12 06:30 PM
05/16/12 06:30 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Quote:

Try the engine without the trans, it looks like maybe if the engine is more level you might have a better chance.




Scattershield is up against the tunnel too... no way unless I removed it, and then how would I get it reconnected. I think I just need a different style pan. I'm going to measure the distance from the front rail to the front of the sump and see if another pan has the required couple of inches.

Here's another view - that sump just looks awfully far forwards:



Thanks for the wiring hints. This is just a "trial fit" so I can make the motor plate to frame rail brackets. Once it goes in for hopefully the final time with the headers alongside, I'll have the starter wired up

Re: Too tight a fit... 451 A-body rant [Re: RodStRace] #1234483
05/16/12 06:31 PM
05/16/12 06:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,969
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart Offline
Rhinotruck
Rhinodart  Offline
Rhinotruck

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,969
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Done it dozens of times and you CANNOT put the engine and trans in at the same time with a deep pan! You must put the engine in first, then put the bellhousing on, then the trans, there is NO OTHER WAY to do it! The Lakewood bellhousing is part of the issue too, I quit using them in A-Body's 30 years ago! Also, B-Body headers will not fit, unless you have a flame hammer handy. You should have asked a few questions here before trying that combination.


The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.

JB Rhinehart, Realist

A-Body's RULE!
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1