Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Shocks [Re: 71birdJ68] #1181736
02/27/12 04:58 AM
02/27/12 04:58 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
The KYBs have a bad rep from the guys that really push their cars. I've had mine in the Charger since 2003 and never thought that there was anything wrong with them. I wrote earlier that I had a similar experience with my old bed. I didn't realize what a worn out piece of crap I had until I bought that new $1900 bed!
I still have the KYBs in the car. I may try another brand when cash allows. Edelbrocks were suggested by some, but I read that they are not making them anymore and the current supply is dwindling down....

Re: Shocks [Re: Kern Dog] #1181737
02/27/12 12:04 PM
02/27/12 12:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 324
GA
R
roy2345 Offline OP
enthusiast
roy2345  Offline OP
enthusiast
R

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 324
GA
I bought the Monroes fellas...Thanks for the advice

Re: Shocks [Re: 71birdJ68] #1181738
02/27/12 01:26 PM
02/27/12 01:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 780
Woodinville, WA
Viol8r Offline
super stock
Viol8r  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 780
Woodinville, WA
Quote:

I know ,i'm trying to build the car so that 99 out of a100 people will think its stock execpt for headers, thats the reason for the polyglass.




You have answered your own question then. It will not matter what shock you run with that tire combo. That is a straight line car...nothing more nothing less. Curious, why build a new big motor and put 40 year old tire technology in it?


1968 Pro-Touring Dodge Charger
*2011 Optima Ultimate Street Car Challenge Invitee
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/features/1203phr_1968_dodge_charger/index.html
Re: Shocks [Re: Viol8r] #1181739
02/27/12 10:05 PM
02/27/12 10:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,452
Morristown Tn.
7
71birdJ68 Offline
master
71birdJ68  Offline
master
7

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,452
Morristown Tn.
Original motor is by by, i had the dana that i paid $150.00 for so why not? I got the alumn hemi for what i could have bought a mopar crate motor for, and was specked to my wants.I bought this car in 74 when i was 19, and i haven't driven it sence 1978. Execpt for wheels tires and headers it was stock the last time i drove it.So execpt for the drive train and two front seats it will be almost like it was.I don't know, i guess i want my cake and eat it to.I think it may be a one of one,but can't prove it and i'm keeping almost all my original stuff to put back on if need be.

Re: Shocks [Re: Viol8r] #1181740
03/01/12 07:32 AM
03/01/12 07:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,862
the frozen wastes...
Pale_Roader Offline
Swears too much
Pale_Roader  Offline
Swears too much

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,862
the frozen wastes...
Quote:

Quote:

I know ,i'm trying to build the car so that 99 out of a100 people will think its stock execpt for headers, thats the reason for the polyglass.




You have answered your own question then. It will not matter what shock you run with that tire combo. That is a straight line car...nothing more nothing less. Curious, why build a new big motor and put 40 year old tire technology in it?




I think "40 year old tire technology" is putting it nicely... Didn't they have radials back then...??? Maybe not on new cars, but available...???

Not trying to be an ass here, but nothing with those tires can be considered a performance car. Even straightline performance is seriously impaired with that crap.

As for the sleeper effect, these days, 99% ov lay people wont bat an eye at a set ov new Radial T/A's, which are also a pretty crappy tire for performance, but still aeons ahead ov Polyglas GT's...

Maybe try and find a solid, modern performance radial in a half-decent size (on a maxed out width stock appearing rim), and paint red-lines or the 'Polyglas GT' label on the side...??? The F.A.S.T. guys tried that with ET Streets... tricky tricky...

Re: Shocks [Re: Pale_Roader] #1181741
03/01/12 04:31 PM
03/01/12 04:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,388
Pikes Peak Country
T
TC@HP2 Offline
master
TC@HP2  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,388
Pikes Peak Country
We're a bit off the topic of shocks, but...

No radials weren't around then, which is why the poly glass design was such a decent performer. Widespread use of automotive radials didn't happen until the mid to late 70s. Old timers will remember why Pontiac was heavily advertising their RTS line and that wasn't Rapid Transit System but their Radial Tuned Suspension. All it amounted to was more agressive alignment specs and better shocks, but it sure threw a lot of consumers, and tire dealers for that matter, for a loop.

Bias ply tires will perform decently. A comparable radial will be faster once the systems is set up for it an the driver gets used to it. But a bias ply is also more forgiving of a tire for driver inexperience when run at the edge of grip. In my experience, bias plys tend to "broadcast" their loss of grip in a more linear and predicatable manner. Similarly, when traction is lost they will regain it in a similar linear way. Radials, on the other hand, tend to break loose more suddenly and not regain traction as quickly.

Thinking back to my oval track days, it took us several weeks of experimenting when we swapped from bias plys to radials before we were able to get the laps speeds back up. But once we did, we also started running faster too.

BTW, the f.a.s.t. cars are running plenty fast on bias plys. Stock reproduction bias play no less. Because of what I said above, a number of drag tires are still available in bias ply as well.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1