Reinforced unibody and spring rates
#1179735
02/17/12 03:13 AM
02/17/12 03:13 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493 Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog
OP
Striving for excellence
|
OP
Striving for excellence
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
|
I have seen the subject briefly discussed before but I'm interested in reading members opinions on the matter. For example, lets say that a car has all the bolt on upgrades that are available to him/her. Bigger torsion bars, sway bars, shocks. The body has no frame connectors, torque boxes or nonstock gussets. Now add in a welded K member, welded frame connectors and torque boxes, LCA stiffener plates and even the triangulated cowl to fender apron brace. Does this mean that now with the cars "foundation" being a much more solid platform, that the spring rates feel firmer? I've wondered if the reduced body flex equates to a driver actually feeling the potential of the T-bars/leafs spring rate? Who has some insight or opinions on this matter? Thanks, Greg
|
|
|
Re: Reinforced unibody and spring rates
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1179739
02/17/12 02:33 PM
02/17/12 02:33 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,697 Bitopia
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,697
Bitopia
|
Quote:
Does this mean that now with the cars "foundation" being a much more solid platform, that the spring rates feel firmer?
3 replies and no direct answer yet.
I thought this subject was discussed recently here and with no conclusion, and few seemed to share my view. I'm used to it.
And sorry to rehash this , but I think a key word here you are using here is "feel". Many seem to miss that.
I look at a hp car as a complete system. The final judgement is "ride" ie feel, and/or handling ie lap times. One can use either or a combination of both to make a judgement as to any improvement/difference when making a change. I also look at a suspension as mostly a bunch of different springs, mostly tuned differently, different rates, different resonant frequencies, but all to a large degree linear. They are in most cases all connected in series. Therefore they all interact with each other. Keep in mind I am only addressing ride, Handling is a different separate issue. Ride is important in the area in how a car reacts and transmits inputs to the drivers so he can drive the car at a level he is comfortable and consistent with.
So these springs are first "tires" ( and tire pressure) , control bushings, TB's, leafs, or springs, the chassis/frame, the drivers seat, and Big Mac personal padding. Shocks are really dampers and just change the amplitudes/frequencies and response rate, and are a separate issue I think, in consideration of the OP's question.
Therefore if any of the above springs are completely removed (as in chassis stiffness, frame connectors, etc) or rates are largely increased, in order maintain same "ride" feel, other "springs" need to be softened. However this is seldom done because, most are seeking a handling improvement, and more control is needed, and that normally requires stiffer springs for less roll, less camber change, less weight transfer etc but then the ride is changing.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
Re: Reinforced unibody and spring rates
[Re: jcc]
#1179740
02/17/12 04:39 PM
02/17/12 04:39 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,865 A collage of whims
topside
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,865
A collage of whims
|
Like BB & jcc are saying, once you take the chassis twist/flex out of the equation, it should take less spring rate to keep the tires in contact with the road. Flex/twist acts like another spring, and it upsets applying the tires consistently, as the chassis winds up & releases. You can't really analyze your suspension setup until you address the chassis stiffness and remove that variable. If you're unsure whether your spring/shock/bar package is optimum, a starting point would be what a similar (weight, tires, power, chassis, wheelbase & track width) car is running to get fast laps, and tune from there. Your setup may vary a bit depending on how much rotation you like, your powerband & gearing, and different track layouts. The clock is the final judge, but it's important that the car isn't fighting you by wearing you out keeping it at the limit.
|
|
|
Re: Reinforced unibody and spring rates
[Re: topside]
#1179741
02/17/12 06:37 PM
02/17/12 06:37 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
Ive talked about this in another thread,but, in my experience although the car rides and acts stiffer, I feel I am in need of bigger tbars and better shocks more than ever. Doesnt make sense to some, but the bottom line is if i was building a car, I wouldnt dial in my rates until the chassis was stiffended to the point it was going to be used in first.
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
Re: Reinforced unibody and spring rates
[Re: BulletBob]
#1179743
02/17/12 09:17 PM
02/17/12 09:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664 IN
ahy
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
|
I added weld in frame connectors, and torque boxes to a '70E. There was a noticable difference driving it before and after with 100% stock suspension. Also a noticable difference jacking it up. Before the upgrade, jacking one corner would visibly twist the car. After it would not.
Then I upgraded to big T bars, sway bars,XHD springs and welded.gusseted K. With the heavier springs, I am sure uneven ground, bumps or cornering loads would twist the frame... I would loose some benefit of the better pieces and eventually crack the unibody.
I am sold on the benefits of the chassis stiffening.
I also believe that "balanced" stifffening can greatly improve handing without making the car unpleasant to drive. "Balanced" meaning frame, springs, sway bars, shocks and tires stiffened up together. If only one or two of those elements are stiffened a lot, there is good chance handling or ride or both will suffer.
|
|
|
Re: Reinforced unibody and spring rates
[Re: BulletBob]
#1179744
02/17/12 09:19 PM
02/17/12 09:19 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Biggest benefit has got to be a consistent spring rate, rather than the ability to change your spring rate.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: Reinforced unibody and spring rates
[Re: Supercuda]
#1179745
02/17/12 10:42 PM
02/17/12 10:42 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493 Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog
OP
Striving for excellence
|
OP
Striving for excellence
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
|
I JUST got back from driving the car after it had been on jackstands for over 3 weeks. With limited time after work and the fact that I hand fabricated everything, I'm okay with how long the job took. What started all of this for me was that my Charger had the tendency to oversteer when pushed hard into a corner. It didn't matter if I was going uphill or down, coasting or on the brakes. Certainly it was worse under throttle, given the power and the Sure Grip differential. I was and still am leaning toward the belief that my roll stiffness is out of whack, with the rear having a higher rate than the front. With that in mind I know what I can do: Either increase the front or decrease the rear. A tail wagging car is the hot ticket for competition 'Drifting", but for street duty I want the car to be neutral. If I want to hang the tail out, I'll lean on the loud pedal. I've considered switching the end link bushings to rubber since I have a few complete sets here. I also have a few other sized rear sway bars to test. One member suggested to disconnect the rear bar and tie it out of the way, then test it. Good idea, and its free! Heres something though that I didn't expect. The car actually rides BETTER than it did before! It soaks up the road dips and bumps as if they weren't even there. Whatever squeaks and rattles the car had (Very few) are now gone. I didn't get to push the car very hard during my drive, but it appears that the frame connectors and torque boxes didn't affect the oversteer condition. I don't expect the reinforced K member install will make a difference there either, but I'm still going ahead with it. The improvement in ride comfort alone made the effort worthwhile. With some trial and error, I'll get the car to handle right.
|
|
|
|
|