Mopar Leaf Springs... Heavy Duty vs Super Stock
#1072497
09/10/11 07:46 AM
09/10/11 07:46 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,000 Millersville, PA
HemiChallenger
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,000
Millersville, PA
|
I am looking at getting some new leaf springs for my challenger. I was looking at the Mopar Heavy Duty (Same as the stock 6/7 leafs on Heave Duty Cars) or the Super Stocks which i do not know much about. Does anyone have any input on these parts and/or pics of the difference from stock to them? Thanks, Steve
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Leaf Springs... Heavy Duty vs Super Stock
[Re: mcmopars]
#1072500
09/10/11 08:29 AM
09/10/11 08:29 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
My 65 dart came as a roller w SS 003's on both sides & not up & running yet but they look stout w a healthy bow which required shock extensions. I got a feeling I'll have 2 swap em out
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Leaf Springs... Heavy Duty vs Super Stock
[Re: HemiChallenger]
#1072502
09/10/11 07:38 PM
09/10/11 07:38 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312 Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
Buy em from Spring's and Things(ESPO). I think that's what there called. Either standard height or 1 or 2" over. They don't sag and have held up good for me on 2 challengers.I would not trust much from MP anymore and not springs for sure. If you want a drag car that sits funny go with the super stock springs from MP with longer front hangers. Welcome back...
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Leaf Springs... Heavy Duty vs Super Stock
[Re: bobby66]
#1072504
09/11/11 10:17 AM
09/11/11 10:17 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,327 Glendale, AZ
69L78Nova
Banned. Forever.
|
Banned. Forever.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,327
Glendale, AZ
|
Any car I've ever had with SS springs rode like an empty dump truck on the street.
1969 Nova 454/M21/3.31 Mild mid-11 second weekend cruiser
1994 F150 XLT Super Cab 2WD 5.0/4R70W/3.55 (Daily driver)
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Leaf Springs... Heavy Duty vs Super Stock
[Re: 69L78Nova]
#1072505
09/11/11 10:20 AM
09/11/11 10:20 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312 Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
Quote:
Any car I've ever had with SS springs rode like an empty dump truck on the street.
Yup, you're have guys come on here and tell us how great SS springs are for the street, they suck for the street.
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Leaf Springs... Heavy Duty vs Super Stock
[Re: Challenger 1]
#1072509
09/11/11 05:35 PM
09/11/11 05:35 PM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 35 Aurora, CO
Manifold
member
|
member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 35
Aurora, CO
|
Quote:
Quote:
Any car I've ever had with SS springs rode like an empty dump truck on the street.
Yup, you're have guys come on here and tell us how great SS springs are for the street, they suck for the street.
X3. Have them on my B-body and they are ridiculous on the street. One thing not mentioned is that the current MP SS springs will put the shackle at a bad angle (leaning from front to back versus the correct back to front). I got rid of the shackles and added spring sliders, moved the front eye bolt to the top eye on the extended mount, which got the rear end down to a "normal" looking height.
Still rides rough as hell.
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Leaf Springs... Heavy Duty vs Super Stock
[Re: HemiChallenger]
#1072510
09/11/11 05:35 PM
09/11/11 05:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,263 Southwestern Ontario Canada
racealittle
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,263
Southwestern Ontario Canada
|
I have XHD's on my '74 Challenger. They are ok. No real complaints.
I had the 3800 lb automatic superstocks grafted onto my Volare for about 30 years. They did their job at the track, and I was surprised how well the car still handled. They never sagged. It was a little work to get the car to sit level from left to right. I had the complete police suspension on the Volare for a couple years and that handled really well. So I would know the difference.
I don't know why everyone bashes superstocks. There is more to suspensions and ride quality than springs alone.
Too many cars, too many parts, too little coin, too little space to work in, too little time left to make it all happen!
Update: down to one ride, still too many parts, a little more jingle in the pocket, gaining space, and it's going to happen this year!
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Leaf Springs... Heavy Duty vs Super Stock
[Re: RapidRobert]
#1072513
09/11/11 05:52 PM
09/11/11 05:52 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154 bethlehem pa
mikemee1331
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
|
Quote:
Quote:
One thing not mentioned is that the current MP SS springs will put the shackle at a bad angle (leaning from front to back versus the correct back to front).
2 clarify 4 me should the BOTTOM of the rear vertical shackle b to the rear?
didn't we do this before? yes, pointing towards the bumper. \
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Leaf Springs... Heavy Duty vs Super Stock
[Re: RapidRobert]
#1072515
09/11/11 06:43 PM
09/11/11 06:43 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
3400 lb SS springs on my 63 I bought from Mancini. And it dont ride like a dump truck. It rides great and hooks good at the track for the rest of the suspension being stock. I would bet it rides as good as any Mopar on HD leaf springs. It dont bounce all over it just rides normal. Ron
Last edited by 383man; 09/11/11 06:43 PM.
|
|
|
|
|