Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Octane booster question....... [Re: BFASTER] #1042321
10/09/11 04:37 PM
10/09/11 04:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,471
So Cal
autoxcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
autoxcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,471
So Cal
Quote:

Quote:

Octane is a measure of knock resistance. More octane will burn slower and not want to explode (knock). A higher octane will not produce more power. More powerful engines run the high test to match wild compression ratios, not because the gas has more bang in it.

Run the lowest octane that doesn't knock with your preferred spark advance.




Thank you. A very sensible answer!




We race circle track with crate ZZ4 chevy motors. These are untouched long blocks. Sealed from the factory.

We've done extensive dyno testing with the 93 and 100 octane available track gas.

The 93 and the 100 octane gave the same dyno numbers. BUT the carb jetting needed to be optimized for each gas.

Re: Octane booster question....... [Re: roadrunner69s] #1042322
10/09/11 04:45 PM
10/09/11 04:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,471
So Cal
autoxcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
autoxcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,471
So Cal
Quote:

My first GTX had a somewhat built engine though I never knew the exact specs. Maybe compression was between 10.1-10.5 to 1. It would ping at WOT on 93 octane and have a slight power lag at 1000-1400 rpm. Running a mix of Sunoco race gas to 93 octane boosted it to around 98-100. With that octane it had no pings, much improvement on the hesitation, and even ran a tad cooler.

I tried various octane "boosters" and none did a darn thing regardless of what they claimed. I'd even add the bottles when the tank was getting low to maximize the effect. A waste of $$. It was actually cheaper back then to add 1-2 gallons of race gas than it was to add an octane booster.
At least with the race gas you were getting a set qty of real octane.

RR69s




The higher octane could have been making up for a carb and ignition tuning issue. And maybe the actual compression and dynamic compression factoring in cam timing needed more than 93 octane.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1