|
Re: tunnelram
[Re: ProSport]
#1023751
07/02/11 05:56 PM
07/02/11 05:56 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,008
Sweet Home Alabama
MRMOPAR622
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,008
Sweet Home Alabama
|
When I 1st tried the 750DP(4779) they were not that great. I took out the power valves(they will not work on a tunnel-ram with PV) milled the choke off and sq jetted them @ 80 in the spring&fall and 78 in the summer months and they were awesome. Maybe this will help some get close to their set-up.
"To Be The Man'You Have Got To Beat The Man"
"T/D and Pro-Bracket Racer"
|
|
|
Re: tunnelram
[Re: 70HemiGTX]
#1023753
07/02/11 09:22 PM
07/02/11 09:22 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
joedust451
super gas
|
super gas
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
|
Its a given, TRs are a better route, Better throttle responce, more torque & HP, better 60fts., better top end, low maintenance once dialed in, better street manners. Its a win-win, you just need to pick the "right" style intake & carbs, if not, you'll be un-happy, thats where some feel there no good  , but "they are" period!!! 
|
|
|
Re: tunnelram
[Re: joedust451]
#1023754
07/02/11 10:11 PM
07/02/11 10:11 PM
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,545
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
Dragula
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,545
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
|
I like them, but I skipped the carb issues all togather...Many mythes abound with TR's, but they are as stated, more HP, more torque, more top end, and a little more finiky, but once set-up, killer... 
|
|
|
Re: tunnelram
[Re: cesar perez]
#1023757
07/03/11 05:18 PM
07/03/11 05:18 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,274
s.w.fl
bonefish
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,274
s.w.fl
|
Quote:
maybe the new modman daul quad intake from indy i think this is a nice setup for 496 ci.  
i looked on their web site didnt see anything for the rb in the modman.
|
|
|
Re: tunnelram
[Re: bonefish]
#1023759
07/03/11 07:29 PM
07/03/11 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
joedust451
super gas
|
super gas
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
|
Quote:
so far it seems the indy tunnel rams are too big for a 496 street drivin motor, is there a TR setup that would work on a sr headed roller cammed street strip motor?i would really like to do the 2-4 TR on mine.
I'm sure the Weiand Street ram will work great with the right carbs, even on a 496, they are very cheap & can be found used pretty easy, They work great on the street.
|
|
|
Re: tunnelram
[Re: joedust451]
#1023760
07/03/11 08:22 PM
07/03/11 08:22 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,274
s.w.fl
bonefish
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,274
s.w.fl
|
Quote:
Quote:
so far it seems the indy tunnel rams are too big for a 496 street drivin motor, is there a TR setup that would work on a sr headed roller cammed street strip motor?i would really like to do the 2-4 TR on mine.
I'm sure the Weiand Street ram will work great with the right carbs, even on a 496, they are very cheap & can be found used pretty easy, They work great on the street.
they dont fit the Indy heads with the max runners.
|
|
|
Re: tunnelram
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#1023762
07/03/11 10:00 PM
07/03/11 10:00 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,274
s.w.fl
bonefish
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,274
s.w.fl
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
so far it seems the indy tunnel rams are too big for a 496 street drivin motor, is there a TR setup that would work on a sr headed roller cammed street strip motor?i would really like to do the 2-4 TR on mine.
I'm sure the Weiand Street ram will work great with the right carbs, even on a 496, they are very cheap & can be found used pretty easy, They work great on the street.
they dont fit the Indy heads with the max runners.
You can weld the flanges up on the standard tunnelram intakes to use them on M.W. port heads  
yes, ive seen that done before but it doesnt look like a job for the faint of heart,i really dont know anyone in my area i would trust with that job.
|
|
|
|
|
