|
Re: Performer intake 383
[Re: CurYellowBird]
#616862
02/18/10 07:33 PM
02/18/10 07:33 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275 Desert Tracker
HYPER8oSoNic
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
|
Quote:
I'm messing with camquest and was wondering if the performer intake for a 383 would be considered standard flow, high flow, or max flow dual plane intake?
Anyone had good luck with this intake? I use it on my sbc and haven't had any problems. I just want to have a dual plane intake that takes some weight off the engine. I removed the stock intake and that sucker is HEAVY! I'm young and thought I was gonna get a hernia.
Found a guy nearby selling one in good shape for 100$.
The Performer is an improvement over the standard manifold, not only in weight savings but in performance. It parallels the HP manifold and is very close to the M1 dual plane. The Performer RPM is a great manifold which extends the power/ torque range over the Performer, given the proper cam is installed. The benefit of the RPM is that you retain "some" low end power while gaining power midrange and top end. For a stock vehicle this may be a good manifold, but the single plane 6 times out 10, gets the nod when modified. The Performer is considered probably a standard flow while the RPM may be the higher flow type. Check on this though, I may not be accurate. Good luck with this. ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbs.gif)
![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/2245452-furysmiley.gif)
"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids" "Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
|
|
|
|
|
|