Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2

Print Thread

Re: Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2 [Re: jbc426] #2774831 05/15/20 12:49 PM 05/15/20 12:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 12,424 Kalispell Mt. H HotRodDave I Live Here
HotRodDave I Live Here H Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 12,424 Kalispell Mt.	Originally Posted by jbc426 I'd use a 5.9 Magnum instead of the diminutive 5.2. The 318 mag has more compression and tighter quench, flat piston for better flame travel and less heat soak so the power difference is very small in reality. That said you will make a hair more with a 5.9 but they are not far apart when running stock short blocks. I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2	73DAD	05/14/20 02:12 PM
Re: Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2	mgoblue9798	05/14/20 02:25 PM
Re: Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2	dvw	05/14/20 03:33 PM
Re: Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2	73DAD	05/14/20 05:50 PM
Re: Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2	sportfury70	05/15/20 01:19 PM
Re: Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2	jbc426	05/15/20 02:41 PM
Re: Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2	HotRodDave	05/15/20 04:49 PM
Re: Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2	73DAD	05/15/20 05:08 PM
Re: Critique this engine combo, carb'd 5.2	Guitar Jones	05/15/20 08:38 PM

Hop To