i did research it, brad. did you notice something odd about those reported test results???

The talk about the octane rating in RON. the research number. when you use the R+M/2 method, you can cut those numbers all in half or so. so the claims of gain 2.8 points of octane shrink down to 1 point or so give or take.

my point about them being junk is that they advertise and make people believe they will raise your octane incredible amounts- hence 108 octane.... Thats bs. not even close to what the results are. and when you try and pull that snake oil type marketing bs on me, I call shenanigans.

they should clearly state that they will raise your octane a point- MAYBE and in the real world, you wont realize much from that as a simple adjustment to give you a slightly richer mixture or backing down the timing or adjusting the vacuum advance to come in later or under more vacuum could do the same.