Stupid fender tag question

Print Thread

Re: Stupid fender tag question [Re: NicksGarage] #1174770 02/09/12 03:12 AM 02/09/12 03:12 AM
Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa 69CoronetRT master
69CoronetRT master Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa	Quote: Isn't the tag for color, trim and things that require certain body part configurations, holes and brackets? Basically yes. It is curious as to why there was so much variation in what was coded between plants. Why is LR so sparse yet other plants list a lot of things? Why do C bodies have a different coding format than A bodies? You would think the way cars were built was fairly standardized between plants. Why weren't fender tags? Seeking: 1969 St. Louis plant VINs, SPD, and VONs. Over 2,000 thanks to you!

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Stupid fender tag question	DANA60	02/08/12 10:25 PM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	6bblgt	02/08/12 10:40 PM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	DANA60	02/08/12 10:48 PM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	6bblgt	02/08/12 11:08 PM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	JohnRR	02/08/12 11:38 PM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	68427vette	02/09/12 03:30 AM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	Alaskan_TA	02/09/12 03:59 AM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	69CoronetRT	02/09/12 05:56 AM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	NicksGarage	02/09/12 06:38 AM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	69CoronetRT	02/09/12 07:12 AM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	JohnRR	02/09/12 02:58 PM
Re: Stupid fender tag question	472 R/T SE	02/09/12 10:17 AM

Hop To