Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
lm - 2 vs fast 170402 #902619
01/12/11 09:05 AM
01/12/11 09:05 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 63
Wisconsin
1964maxwedge Offline OP
member
1964maxwedge  Offline OP
member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 63
Wisconsin
I 'm trying to figure out which one is the best for me. All I need is air/fuel ratio no other out puts . Also do I need a dual channel ? The car is 1964 b body 505 with msd 6al2 .
thanks for your input

Re: lm - 2 vs fast 170402 [Re: 1964maxwedge] #902620
01/12/11 09:32 AM
01/12/11 09:32 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

I 'm trying to figure out which one is the best for me. All I need is air/fuel ratio no other out puts . Also do I need a dual channel ? The car is 1964 b body 505 with msd 6al2 .
thanks for your input




I use a LM-1 and just changed it from one bank to the
other and once you determine the differential between
the banks you really dont even need to change banks...
I havent tried the FAST system so I cant help you
there.. but I would recommend the rpm logger for the
LM-1 if you go that direction







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1