|
Re: Hyd. Roller vs. Solid FT
[Re: kzinge1]
#857599
11/19/10 03:56 AM
11/19/10 03:56 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,668 Mi,U.S.A.
mike s
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,668
Mi,U.S.A.
|
An aggressive lobe like the Comp MM flat tappet will make more power and with the edm lifter will live too.You might check their circle track lobes also.Let are very stable and should live very well with the edm lifters.I'm not a fan of their shelf grinds.Check with Bullet and Engle also.
Leave the gun.......take the Cannoli's....Mike
|
|
|
Re: Hyd. Roller vs. Solid FT
[Re: mike s]
#857603
11/19/10 10:36 AM
11/19/10 10:36 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051 The Great White North
RAMM
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
|
First off, I would say stick with the hydraulic roller, I doubt you would see any gains going to a solid FT with unported heads. Second- LOSE those rockers and replace them with these. J.Rob SKMFX Blog
2009 PHR\EMC Competitor 2010 PHR\EMC Competitor 2011 PHR\EMC Competitor 2012 PHR\EMC Competitor 2013 PHR\EMC Competitor 2014 HotRod/EMC Competitor 2015 HotRod/EMC NoShow 2016 HotRod/EMC 3rd place SPEC Bigblock 2018 HotRod/EMC 7th place G3
|
|
|
Re: Hyd. Roller vs. Solid FT
[Re: RAMM]
#857604
11/19/10 05:25 PM
11/19/10 05:25 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 284 Louisiana
kzinge1
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 284
Louisiana
|
Quote:
First off, I would say stick with the hydraulic roller, I doubt you would see any gains going to a solid FT with unported heads. Second- LOSE those rockers and replace them with these. J.Rob SKMFX Blog
I didn't think those would work on a roller cam. What's wrong with the 440Source ones? I've only read about one failure.
|
|
|
|
|
|