Re: 3:55 vs 3:91
[Re: SleeperBee]
#848105
11/07/10 02:44 PM
11/07/10 02:44 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698 NE Oklahoma
Von
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
|
Depends on quite a few things.
What exactly is your new combo?
72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72.
Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
|
|
|
Re: 3:55 vs 3:91
[Re: SleeperBee]
#848106
11/07/10 03:00 PM
11/07/10 03:00 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,169 Virginia Beach, VA
Old School
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,169
Virginia Beach, VA
|
with all street use,i would stay with the 3.91,s. i use 4.10,s in my 580" 70 charger,and love them.it,s only a street car too.
68 cuda formula S 588" bb 5sp 70 CUDA CONVERT 500" 5SP (SUBLIME) 70 CUDA CONVERT 500" 5SP (PLUMCRAZY):TOO MUCH HORSEPOWER, IS ALMOST ENOUGH!
|
|
|
Re: 3:55 vs 3:91
[Re: tjmarcus1]
#848114
11/07/10 10:00 PM
11/07/10 10:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,179 S.E. Conn
Hoof Hearted
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,179
S.E. Conn
|
Quote:
3.91'S with a 500" motor? it should FRY the tires thru 1st. and 2nd unless it is a really weak motor. imo
I went from 3:23's to 3:73's and gained 1/10th and 1mph in the qtr.
69 Coronet, 4200lbs with over weight driver , 496, TM7, Mopar Wedge alum. heads, Eddy 800cfm, Lunati 553", 284* cam, Mopar Economy 166k converter, 440 bars, XHD springs and snubber, 275/60/15 MT Drag radials; Best of 11.88 @ 114...
Was very happy with 3:23's, but 3:73's are more fun around town.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_uLhazml...re=mfu_in_order
2005 300C Hemi 2014 Ram ProMaster 2500
I Rekey, Repin old Chrysler locks and cut keys by code
|
|
|
Re: 3:55 vs 3:91
[Re: Twostick]
#848115
11/07/10 10:01 PM
11/07/10 10:01 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698 NE Oklahoma
Von
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
|
Quote:
. Converter will be key.
72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72.
Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
|
|
|
Re: 3:55 vs 3:91
[Re: SleeperBee]
#848116
11/07/10 11:04 PM
11/07/10 11:04 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,284 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,284
Bend,OR USA
|
I have a pump gas 512 low deck stroker motor I put in my 1971 Duster, it ran mid tens at 128.+ MPH with 4.10, 3.91 and 3.73 gears in the 8 3/4 with the same converter The percent of differences between the 3.73 to the 4.10 is right at 10.%(4.10 divided into 3.73 =.9097 the way my calculator figures) Big C.I. motors develop a lot of torque, torque spins the tires, not HP The differences between the 3.55 and the 3.91 is right at 9.2 % on the starting line and in high gear, with your size tires (I run 315x60x15 MT ET Street Radials, 30 inches tall) I would try the 3.91 first seeing as there in the car and if it spins or revs to much switch to the 3.55 as long as you don't have them now. If you have both try the ones in the car first My car didn't really know the difference between all three sets except in high gear, the car seem to spend a lot more time in high gear with the 3.73 The time slips where almost identicle EDIT: Make surew and buy a really good, custom built converter for your car, don't skimp
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 11/07/10 11:41 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
|
|