|
Re: Eagle rotating assembly, rod side clearance question
[Re: JohnRR]
#811122
09/22/10 07:20 PM
09/22/10 07:20 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,431
Florida STAYcation
BeEtLeJuIcE !
The village idiot's idiot
|
The village idiot's idiot
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,431
Florida STAYcation
|
Quote:
 
Why don't you try and post some real facts once you learn English you resin huffing  
The REAL FACTS are there ..... you BUTThead !
I have been asked ... why do I like butting-heads with RR ? BECAUSE I like showing-him-up ...for the BUTThead he truly is ....  
Go on someone else ..... you BUTThead !
|
|
|
Re: Eagle rotating assembly, rod side clearance question
[Re: JohnRR]
#811123
09/22/10 07:37 PM
09/22/10 07:37 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,431
Florida STAYcation
BeEtLeJuIcE !
The village idiot's idiot
|
The village idiot's idiot
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,431
Florida STAYcation
|
Quote:
*** You are ignoring this user ***
Let me add ....
If you ARE ignoring-me ... then why are you commenting on what I say ?
So in addition to being a BUTThead and a DUMBbell ... are you are also a JACKazz ?
EVERYTHING points to ... roger-that 
|
|
|
Re: Eagle rotating assembly, rod side clearance question
[Re: crscuda]
#811125
09/22/10 07:42 PM
09/22/10 07:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
RyanJ
moparts member
|
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
Quote:
I have a Eagle 472 rotating assembly that while mocking it up found that the rod side clearanc is at .032". The eagle rod width = 1.007" +-.001".
Is this to much clearance? If so how would you fix it?
Thanks
It's fine, run it as is.
|
|
|
Re: Eagle rotating assembly, rod side clearance question
[Re: Thumperdart]
#811127
09/22/10 08:45 PM
09/22/10 08:45 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,431
Florida STAYcation
BeEtLeJuIcE !
The village idiot's idiot
|
The village idiot's idiot
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,431
Florida STAYcation
|
Quote:
How old are you anyhow? 11+ years w/.035+ side clearance and all`s well w/my lowly 9-second street car and my combo`s nothing new and has been around since the 80`s so screw "theory" and go with whats proven time and time again. 
OLD 'nuff to know that 035 is tooooo FAT of RCS !!
JUST THINK how quick it would be with the proper RSC ? ... 
|
|
|
Re: Eagle rotating assembly, rod side clearance question
[Re: JohnRR]
#811128
09/22/10 08:59 PM
09/22/10 08:59 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,431
Florida STAYcation
BeEtLeJuIcE !
The village idiot's idiot
|
The village idiot's idiot
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,431
Florida STAYcation
|
Quote:
Excuse me mr. fiberASS has it ever crossed your feeble mind that some things can be re engineered and possibly IMPROVED? One either uses what is available NEW or gets stuck posts want ads on internet forums looking for 40 yr old junk because they have their heads buried in the sand.
You post like the Chrysler engineers are GODs or something , they have done some stupid things.... I, and others, are not saying the original spec is wrong or stupid but it's not the end all spec... just like engineers from the rest of the car makers and engineers in general, I know as I work fixing their messes on a daily basis.
As far as butting heads to make me look bad ... look up the word NARCISSIST ... if you can not do/say anything to make yourself look good then try to make others look bad ... you are a TEXTBOOK case.
Good night 
I want to apologize to the OP and the rest of the members for mucking up this thread , I've got the proctoligist on ignore so I won't have to see anymore of his senile drivel....
ONLY a JACKazz puts someone on "ignore" ...and then follows them around like a little puppy-dog comments on everything they say
You act like a DOPE ..... and you do THAT so well !! ... 
So in your opinion ... fattening up RCS is the "trick" now ? Show me ANY build-article ANYWHERE that recommends that. Fat-RSC is an "improved" and re-engineered spec? What is the RSC on say a 2010 Hemi ? ..I will bet it is closer to 009 than it is to 035 !!
Me going out-of-my-way to make you look bad ? .... it is NOT ME that instigates ANYTHING with you. I try and avoid food-fights with you ...
.....but NO MORE !
LEAVE ME ALONE ...and I will do the same to you.
To add ....you want to apologize for mucking-up a thread ? ..... WHY do that now? ... and does that go for the others that you have F-ed up ?
And WHAT DID you contribute here ....other than MUCK ? ... I quoted a FSM ...
...and what did you do ? .... just your typical BS.
|
|
|
Re: Eagle rotating assembly, rod side clearance question
[Re: crscuda]
#811129
09/23/10 12:44 AM
09/23/10 12:44 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York
|
The reason is so that they can use the same tooling as on the BBC rods that the blank was originally made for.
Not sure I follow the argument? If the leak is .002" at the journal, how is anything bigger than that more of a leak? Does putting a 2" hose on the end of a 1" hose make more water come out?
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: Eagle rotating assembly, rod side clearance question
[Re: Crizila]
#811132
09/23/10 01:13 PM
09/23/10 01:13 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,080
organ
maximum entropy
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,080
organ
|
just be sure you have side clearance at the pin end to accommodate side clearance at the bottom end. i've seen some .050 with no problems whatsoever.
for what is the good life if not doing things thoughtfully?
|
|
|
|
|
.