Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? #712589
05/31/10 05:31 PM
05/31/10 05:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
domingo Offline OP
EL Master
domingo  Offline OP
EL Master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
Has anybody used these heads?

Any comments?

Are they good, bad?

Any issues?

How do they compare to the Edelbrocks?

Id' buy eddies but the thing is they dont look anywhere close to OEM. The stealths look very stockish once painted...

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: domingo] #712590
05/31/10 05:44 PM
05/31/10 05:44 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 207
warren, mich.
D
dwayne welder Offline
enthusiast
dwayne welder  Offline
enthusiast
D

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 207
warren, mich.
depends on how much power you want to make. they look like 906 castings, only in aluminum. i haven"t flowed one yet, so not nowing how good they are.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: domingo] #712591
05/31/10 06:06 PM
05/31/10 06:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 625
Florida-West Coast
Thor500 Offline
mopar
Thor500  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 625
Florida-West Coast
Bolted a set on out of the box, work great! Whats not to like?

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: Thor500] #712592
05/31/10 06:11 PM
05/31/10 06:11 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,293
Rock Springs
Bob_Coomer Offline
master
Bob_Coomer  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,293
Rock Springs
IMO they are a great replacement head, and mkae good power too. On the same note, I dont think they are a race head, and not a option in a race type appication....
Of coarse these are just my opinions.


[color:"red"]65 Hemi Belvedere coming soon [/color]
[color:"#00FF00"]557" Indy engine 1.07 60ft 144mph in the 8th 2100 lbs package [/color]
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: Bob_Coomer] #712593
05/31/10 06:31 PM
05/31/10 06:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 625
Florida-West Coast
Thor500 Offline
mopar
Thor500  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 625
Florida-West Coast
I have another set coming cnc'd for my 500" stroker, 12:1 590 cam, I'm expecting easy 10.50's

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: Thor500] #712594
05/31/10 06:32 PM
05/31/10 06:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
MikeyT Offline
master
MikeyT  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
I really like mine, they work well and really flow well. I think I flowed 274 at .6 inch of lift out of the box, good numbers really helps my 440 breath.

Mike


1969 Dodge Dart Swinger
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: Thor500] #712595
05/31/10 06:34 PM
05/31/10 06:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
dOc ! Offline
The village idiot's idiot
dOc !  Offline
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
Right OOTB ? .... some people have suggested that you check everything.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: dOc !] #712596
05/31/10 06:42 PM
05/31/10 06:42 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 207
warren, mich.
D
dwayne welder Offline
enthusiast
dwayne welder  Offline
enthusiast
D

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 207
warren, mich.
274@.6 sounds like a good bowl ported, and gasket match set of 906. I woulden wast my money on cnc, porting on these heads period!

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: dwayne welder] #712597
05/31/10 07:18 PM
05/31/10 07:18 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 843
Suffolk,VA
I
ireland383 Offline
super stock
ireland383  Offline
super stock
I

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 843
Suffolk,VA
Had my machinist check them over and he was impressed. Bolted them on and . I probably could use a little more cam with them.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: ireland383] #712598
05/31/10 07:32 PM
05/31/10 07:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295
U.S.
M
moparniac Offline
master
moparniac  Offline
master
M

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295
U.S.
use the search function for anything 440source related. people are tired of arguing over the overall quality that comes from there


Mopar Performance
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: dwayne welder] #712599
05/31/10 07:37 PM
05/31/10 07:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 625
Florida-West Coast
Thor500 Offline
mopar
Thor500  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 625
Florida-West Coast
Quote:

[Email]274@.6[/Email] sounds like a good bowl ported, and gasket match set of 906. I woulden wast my money on cnc, porting on these heads period!



Modern cylinder head cnc's them, I think they know what there doing!

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: domingo] #712600
05/31/10 08:05 PM
05/31/10 08:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,772
Keymar, MD
DusterKid Offline
top fuel
DusterKid  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,772
Keymar, MD
used a set for a yr now and work great.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: Thor500] #712601
05/31/10 08:36 PM
05/31/10 08:36 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,293
Rock Springs
Bob_Coomer Offline
master
Bob_Coomer  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,293
Rock Springs
Quote:

Quote:

[Email]274@.6[/Email] sounds like a good bowl ported, and gasket match set of 906. I woulden wast my money on cnc, porting on these heads period!



Modern cylinder head cnc's them, I think they know what there doing!



I know how they work, I purchased a set of Eddy's not long after they came out. The actually did check out OK for Use OOTB. Big heavy 69 Coronet totally stock suspension and gearing, bench seat went mid 7's in the 8th mile, so I know how they can work, seeing how they are direct copy's.
Im just saying they have cracking problems, I can only imagine cnc port work would make them much worse.
This isnt hear say, My best friend has a set on his mud truck, they are one season old...Both heads leak water like a sprinkler.
Im not saying he done everything correct with this engine, but I dont see Indy heads, or Edelbrock heads cracking under race conditions.
Thats all I am saying.....
great for a little street car, or daily driver, they wont go on anything that makes more than 500hp in my book.
They would get looked over, just like any other head for that matter.
Fact is the castings are not that great.
The material is soft. Valves, retainers and springs are junk, and wouldnt run these OOTB on one of my engines if they were offered for FREE..just to do this.
Im not trying to make this a 440 Source Bash fest.
Im just saying they are ment for a replacement head..They work well, and do work well even ported. But the casting problems and parts, and machine work can and do cause major problems....
Just the facts.


[color:"red"]65 Hemi Belvedere coming soon [/color]
[color:"#00FF00"]557" Indy engine 1.07 60ft 144mph in the 8th 2100 lbs package [/color]
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: Bob_Coomer] #712602
05/31/10 08:58 PM
05/31/10 08:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 625
Florida-West Coast
Thor500 Offline
mopar
Thor500  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 625
Florida-West Coast
Thats the first instance I've heard of cracking. I'd like to think thats an isolated incident. My ootb set were from the first batch they sold.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: Bob_Coomer] #712603
05/31/10 09:02 PM
05/31/10 09:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,039
Mooresburg, Tn
'
'72CudaRacer Offline
top fuel
'72CudaRacer  Offline
top fuel
'

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,039
Mooresburg, Tn
I put a set on my 440 this year. So far so good. 3200 lb E body, 11.5" MT tires, SS leaf springs, 13.5+ comp, .590 MP cam. 60' 1.39, 6.59 1/8, 103+ MPH (in East Tenn hills, 1300 ft above sea level). Didn't get to put it on dyno, but works out to approx 585 HP?

Brian Dunnigan

6013502-IMG_0830.JPG (823 downloads)
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: Thor500] #712604
05/31/10 09:09 PM
05/31/10 09:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
T
Triple Threat Offline
master
Triple Threat  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
Quote:

Thats the first instance I've heard of cracking. I'd like to think thats an isolated incident. My ootb set were from the first batch they sold.




I know of 3 or 4 people who have/had stealths. 2 of those people were making roughly 575-600 hp and both had issues with cracking. Heads were returned on both instances. Both now have Eddy's


-Dustin
67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi
68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: Triple Threat] #712605
05/31/10 09:36 PM
05/31/10 09:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Quote:

Quote:

Thats the first instance I've heard of cracking. I'd like to think thats an isolated incident. My ootb set were from the first batch they sold.




I know of 3 or 4 people who have/had stealths. 2 of those people were making roughly 575-600 hp and both had issues with cracking. Heads were returned on both instances. Both now have Eddy's




Well I'll have to cross my fingers then. I've also got a set of first production run stealths. No problems yet but little miles on them so far. Will be in that hp range in the future so time will tell.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #712606
05/31/10 09:51 PM
05/31/10 09:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,348
Mt.Vernon ,Ohio
VernMotor Offline
master
VernMotor  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,348
Mt.Vernon ,Ohio
There been at lease 5 sets posted on this web site alone that been cracked..I have seen 2 sets myself that been cracked... like it been said..if they do not crack..they would make a nice replacement head..They dam sure ain't no race head.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: VernMotor] #712607
06/01/10 12:12 AM
06/01/10 12:12 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
440sourcedotcom Offline
super stock
440sourcedotcom  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
Quote:

There been at lease 5 sets posted on this web site alone that been cracked..I have seen 2 sets myself that been cracked... like it been said..if they do not crack..they would make a nice replacement head..They dam sure ain't no race head.




We did have one isolated production run last year that had a problem with the aluminum that made the heads more prone to cracking. The problem was solved shortly after it was discovered, and we have sold over two thousand heads since that particular production batch, and not a single one has had a cracking problem.

Every single customer that has called us with a cracked head has had it replaced under warranty at no charge, and we will continue to do this as long as possible.

Again, any cracks were an isolated incident from one production run. Please understand that any manufacturer, no matter how well known of a "name brand" or no matter expensive or inexpensive their products are, they will occasionally have issues which need to be corrected. This is the reason why reputable manufacturers offer a warranty against defects in manufacturing for a specified period of time after purchase.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: domingo] #712608
06/01/10 03:46 AM
06/01/10 03:46 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
I have a set for a future build and castings look really good. The springs/retainers should be good for a hydraulic cam with around 0.500"+ lift?
The pros of these heads:
#1 - They look like a stock head (no other aluminum head does.)
#2 - They fit like a stock head (straight plugs allow using manifolds or headers designed for stock heads. The angled plugs of the Edelbrocks can cause problems with headers not designed for the angled plugs.)
#3 - Cost and performance.

The cons:
#1 - I guess they are not made in the USA?
#2 - The large diameter chamber needs a larger bore size head gasket?
#3 - Possable quality issue on some early heads? (just to be fair, my Stealth heads castings looked better than my Edelbrock Victors, and I did crack the Edelbrock heads, so any company can have problems?)

I also know of at least three people who have been running the Stealth heads for a year or more with no problems

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 451Mopar] #712609
06/01/10 08:11 AM
06/01/10 08:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,065
Niles , Ohio
T
therocks Offline
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
therocks  Offline
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,065
Niles , Ohio
Mine are going on their third year.My 440 runs 12.5 Ross domes and street and strip.I did upgrade the locks retainers and springs which I would have done with Eddys.Just had to back cut the valves and cleaned them up a bit.Rocky


Chrysler Firepower
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: therocks] #712610
06/01/10 09:24 AM
06/01/10 09:24 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
B
BobR Offline
master
BobR  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
I'd certainly(and have) buy a 440Source engine kit.I would not buy these heads-crack prone or not-for any kind of race car. For a street deal, fine, but the flow numbers coming out of these heads aren't race car worthy type figures.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: BobR] #712611
06/01/10 11:37 AM
06/01/10 11:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
moparmanjames Offline
pro stock
moparmanjames  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
I guess I'm confused, I see a lot of bracket cars at the track running stock heads, I see stock eliminator cars running stock heads, and I'm guessing these Stealth heads flow better than stock from what I have read.
Why would they not be race worthy if they flow better than stock both out of the box and ported?
I would think it would depend on what you wanted to do and how fast you want to go. I see no reason why a set these CNC ported Stealth heads wouldn't be fine for a 3500lb bracket car running 10's all day long.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: moparmanjames] #712612
06/01/10 04:03 PM
06/01/10 04:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
domingo Offline OP
EL Master
domingo  Offline OP
EL Master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,670
Lima, Peru
I have a friend who had his stealth heads crack too....he was running high compression. like 13:1 something like that.

thats why im asking.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: domingo] #712613
06/01/10 04:14 PM
06/01/10 04:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
B1Fish540 Offline
master
B1Fish540  Offline
master

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
Quote:

I have a friend who had his stealth heads crack too....he was running high compression. like 13:1 something like that.

thats why im asking.




Sounds like all he has to do is send 'em back to brandon for some good ones. Thats cool of Brandon to admitt to the problem, i'm sure he will make good on his promise. I bet ther are zillions of guys who have had no problems with them, and I still want a set for a future low deck project I'm working on.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: moparmanjames] #712614
06/01/10 04:25 PM
06/01/10 04:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
B
BobR Offline
master
BobR  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
Quote:

I guess I'm confused, I see a lot of bracket cars at the track running stock heads, I see stock eliminator cars running stock heads, and I'm guessing these Stealth heads flow better than stock from what I have read.
Why would they not be race worthy if they flow better than stock both out of the box and ported?
I would think it would depend on what you wanted to do and how fast you want to go. I see no reason why a set these CNC ported Stealth heads wouldn't be fine for a 3500lb bracket car running 10's all day long.




I guess that all depends on how fast you want to go. Mid 10's to me isn't what it used to be. Compare flow numbers of maxxed out Stealths to almost anything Indy makes but especially their top shelf stuff. Now compare this stuff to the better Ford and Chevy heads. I stand by what I said.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: BobR] #712615
06/01/10 04:56 PM
06/01/10 04:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 568
Ky
M
moparmafia Offline
mopar
moparmafia  Offline
mopar
M

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 568
Ky
Quote:

Quote:

I guess I'm confused, I see a lot of bracket cars at the track running stock heads, I see stock eliminator cars running stock heads, and I'm guessing these Stealth heads flow better than stock from what I have read.
Why would they not be race worthy if they flow better than stock both out of the box and ported?
I would think it would depend on what you wanted to do and how fast you want to go. I see no reason why a set these CNC ported Stealth heads wouldn't be fine for a 3500lb bracket car running 10's all day long.




I guess that all depends on how fast you want to go. Mid 10's to me isn't what it used to be. Compare flow numbers of maxxed out Stealths to almost anything Indy makes but especially their top shelf stuff. Now compare this stuff to the better Ford and Chevy heads. I stand by what I said.




i think most people get caught up on flow numbers and dyno numbers. we might not have the most peak flow but the stock mopar heads have very good velocity and make good power. i have ran mopars my whole adult life and i have outrun many a ford and chevies that have higher flow numbers and an impressive dyno sheet. my very mild 1977 400 with stock 452 heads was out running my friends 93 mustang with edelbrock heads cam and intake. but man did his flow sheet look good. lol

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: BobR] #712616
06/01/10 05:35 PM
06/01/10 05:35 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
B1Fish540 Offline
master
B1Fish540  Offline
master

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
Quote:

Quote:

I guess I'm confused, I see a lot of bracket cars at the track running stock heads, I see stock eliminator cars running stock heads, and I'm guessing these Stealth heads flow better than stock from what I have read.
Why would they not be race worthy if they flow better than stock both out of the box and ported?
I would think it would depend on what you wanted to do and how fast you want to go. I see no reason why a set these CNC ported Stealth heads wouldn't be fine for a 3500lb bracket car running 10's all day long.




I guess that all depends on how fast you want to go. Mid 10's to me isn't what it used to be. Compare flow numbers of maxxed out Stealths to almost anything Indy makes but especially their top shelf stuff. Now compare this stuff to the better Ford and Chevy heads. I stand by what I said.




440Source does not claim that it is a race head. That is totally NOT its purpose. Its a stock replacement(almost identical)and is supposed to make a "stock looking" motor faster than it looks. And I think it succeeds for its intended purpose...plus, it is cheap. This may tempt alot of guys to use it for bracket or other limited type of racing. Just like the Eddy RPM. The flow numbers are pretty much the same for both. The RPM may look more like a race head but its not much better than a maxed out 906 iron head ..just like the Stealth. The BB Chev head, by its design, is an inherently a good flowing head just like a Hemi. So, you almost have to compare the BB mopar to a SB chevy...thats what it most closely resembles and the power can go from the most wimpy to fairly muscular...but not until serious changes are made in the design..ports, valve size and length etc etc,. Then you have a head that does not even look stock any more. The ports are much bigger and raised, the plugs are relocated and the head itself is taller and wider.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: B1Fish540] #712617
06/01/10 05:48 PM
06/01/10 05:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
440sourcedotcom Offline
super stock
440sourcedotcom  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I guess I'm confused, I see a lot of bracket cars at the track running stock heads, I see stock eliminator cars running stock heads, and I'm guessing these Stealth heads flow better than stock from what I have read.
Why would they not be race worthy if they flow better than stock both out of the box and ported?
I would think it would depend on what you wanted to do and how fast you want to go. I see no reason why a set these CNC ported Stealth heads wouldn't be fine for a 3500lb bracket car running 10's all day long.




I guess that all depends on how fast you want to go. Mid 10's to me isn't what it used to be. Compare flow numbers of maxxed out Stealths to almost anything Indy makes but especially their top shelf stuff. Now compare this stuff to the better Ford and Chevy heads. I stand by what I said.




440Source does not claim that it is a race head. That is totally NOT its purpose. Its a stock replacement(almost identical)and is supposed to make a "stock looking" motor faster than it looks. And I think it succeeds for its intended purpose...plus, it is cheap. This may tempt alot of guys to use it for bracket or other limited type of racing. Just like the Eddy RPM. The flow numbers are pretty much the same for both. The RPM may look more like a race head but its not much better than a maxed out 906 iron head ..just like the Stealth. The BB Chev head, by its design, is an inherently a good flowing head just like a Hemi. So, you almost have to compare the BB mopar to a SB chevy...thats what it most closely resembles and the power can go from the most wimpy to fairly muscular...but not until serious changes are made in the design..ports, valve size and length etc etc,. Then you have a head that does not even look stock any more. The ports are much bigger and raised, the plugs are relocated and the head itself is taller and wider.




When comparing flow numbers from different companies, you are not comparing apples to apples. It is well known in the industry that certain companies greatly inflate their flow numbers, while others are much more accurate. The ONLY way to evaluate flow numbers is if all the heads you are comparing are flowed on the same calibrated flow bench, bolted to the same fixture (bore size), and flowed by the same person at the same time.

Bottom line is, several dozen of our CNC'd stealth heads have been dyno'd on 500+ CI engines. They make in the area of 675-725 horsepower everytime like clockwork.

We will be the first to tell you, if you are looking for 750+ HP, these are not the heads for you. If you are looking for 700/725 HP or less, (generally in the 9 second range for most cars) then they will be a good option, as they have been proven without a doubt to be capable of these power levels.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: B1Fish540] #712618
06/01/10 05:52 PM
06/01/10 05:52 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 732
eastern,Ky
70RT Charger Offline
super stock
70RT Charger  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 732
eastern,Ky
Im thinking about building a 512 stroker from 440 source and they recommend running the stealth heads or the Elderbrock Victor.I was told the same thing about the Stealth heads cracking,so whats the difference between the eddy Victor and the eddy rpm.I was told to go with a eddy victor?

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: BobR] #712619
06/01/10 06:03 PM
06/01/10 06:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
B1Fish540 Offline
master
B1Fish540  Offline
master

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
Quote:

I'd certainly(and have) buy a 440Source engine kit.I would not buy these heads-crack prone or not-for any kind of race car. For a street deal, fine, but the flow numbers coming out of these heads aren't race car worthy type figures.




Bob, I do understand where you are coming from(from other posts you have made)and I agree that the term "race head" should be confined to heads that have some of the modification I mentioned in my other post. In other words, they are considered exotic. Examples would be original B1, 440-1, Predator, B1-TS, Brewer, 426 Hemi..these heads are all capable of 1000+ HP. Even the Victor and mopar Stage VI are more "exotic" than "stock" so should be consider race heads. as well, imho.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 70RT Charger] #712620
06/01/10 06:04 PM
06/01/10 06:04 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
B1Fish540 Offline
master
B1Fish540  Offline
master

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
Quote:

Im thinking about building a 512 stroker from 440 source and they recommend running the stealth heads or the Elderbrock Victor.I was told the same thing about the Stealth heads cracking,so whats the difference between the eddy Victor and the eddy rpm.I was told to go with a eddy victor?




about 100 HP!

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712621
06/01/10 06:10 PM
06/01/10 06:10 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
dOc ! Offline
The village idiot's idiot
dOc !  Offline
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
Quote:



Bottom line is, several dozen of our CNC'd stealth heads have been dyno'd on 500+ CI engines. They make in the area of 675-725 horsepower everytime like clockwork.






CNCed ? .. how about the-best OOTB ??

And what would your grocery-list on that motor be?

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: dOc !] #712622
06/01/10 06:36 PM
06/01/10 06:36 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
440sourcedotcom Offline
super stock
440sourcedotcom  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
Quote:

Quote:



Bottom line is, several dozen of our CNC'd stealth heads have been dyno'd on 500+ CI engines. They make in the area of 675-725 horsepower everytime like clockwork.






CNCed ? .. how about the-best OOTB ??

And what would your grocery-list on that motor be?




For the motors we are talking about, we are talking 500+ cubes, a cam at least .565+ lift, usually pump gas (10 to 10.5:1 compression - a few of the engines have been 12 or 13 to 1), roller rockers, 950-1050 carb, etc. Obviously, components must be matched correctly, and the engine must be tuned correctly, but there's no magic to it.

Out of the box, (non CNC version) most guys are making 540-560 HP with similar internal components as described above.

If you take the well known formula of CFM x .257 x number of cylinders, these horsepower numbers quoted are within the range of this formula, based on the CFM numbers we publish for our heads. This stuff is not rocket science and there's no mysteries to it, it's pretty simple and straightforward.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: BobR] #712623
06/01/10 07:32 PM
06/01/10 07:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
moparmanjames Offline
pro stock
moparmanjames  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
Quote:

Quote:

I guess I'm confused, I see a lot of bracket cars at the track running stock heads, I see stock eliminator cars running stock heads, and I'm guessing these Stealth heads flow better than stock from what I have read.
Why would they not be race worthy if they flow better than stock both out of the box and ported?
I would think it would depend on what you wanted to do and how fast you want to go. I see no reason why a set these CNC ported Stealth heads wouldn't be fine for a 3500lb bracket car running 10's all day long.




I guess that all depends on how fast you want to go. Mid 10's to me isn't what it used to be. Compare flow numbers of maxxed out Stealths to almost anything Indy makes but especially their top shelf stuff. Now compare this stuff to the better Ford and Chevy heads. I stand by what I said.




So basically you agree that they are fine for a mid 10 second bracket car or slower, yes?
It seems that 10 seconds or slower is what 70% of the people are running at the track, basically most of Pro Bracket along with sportsman/street.

These are race cars too you know.

BTW I have a set of maxxed out Indy SR's that flow around 345 and I love them too.

Last edited by moparmanjames; 06/01/10 07:38 PM.
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712624
06/01/10 07:35 PM
06/01/10 07:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
moparmanjames Offline
pro stock
moparmanjames  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
Quote:



When comparing flow numbers from different companies, you are not comparing apples to apples. It is well known in the industry that certain companies greatly inflate their flow numbers, while others are much more accurate. The ONLY way to evaluate flow numbers is if all the heads you are comparing are flowed on the same calibrated flow bench, bolted to the same fixture (bore size), and flowed by the same person at the same time.

Bottom line is, several dozen of our CNC'd stealth heads have been dyno'd on 500+ CI engines. They make in the area of 675-725 horsepower everytime like clockwork.

We will be the first to tell you, if you are looking for 750+ HP, these are not the heads for you. If you are looking for 700/725 HP or less, (generally in the 9 second range for most cars) then they will be a good option, as they have been proven without a doubt to be capable of these power levels.




Nice numbers, do you guys plan on offering a raised port/longer valve head anytime soon? Thanks

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: moparmanjames] #712625
06/01/10 07:59 PM
06/01/10 07:59 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
440sourcedotcom Offline
super stock
440sourcedotcom  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
Quote:



Nice numbers, do you guys plan on offering a raised port/longer valve head anytime soon? Thanks




Yes, our Stealth stage II heads are out of design and development and are currently in the pattern/tooling production stage. They may hit the market by the end of the year.

They will use an offset rocker to get rid of the "pushrod turn", but still have the exterior factory look and form factor (no cast in "intake spacers, raised valve covers, etc).

As far as flow numbers, we're getting peak numbers of about 325 cfm from them out of the box. On our same bench, out of the box victors flowed about 330, so they are holding their own with victors out of the box, however because of the raised port and longer valve design of the victors, the victors should have more potential with all out porting then our Stealth stage II. But we are confident the Stealth stage II should easily be an 800-850HP capable head.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712626
06/01/10 08:03 PM
06/01/10 08:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
B1Fish540 Offline
master
B1Fish540  Offline
master

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,840
Flint, Michigan
Quote:

Quote:



Nice numbers, do you guys plan on offering a raised port/longer valve head anytime soon? Thanks




Yes, our Stealth stage II heads are out of design and development and are currently in the pattern/tooling production stage. They may hit the market by the end of the year.

They will use an offset rocker to get rid of the "pushrod turn", but still have the exterior factory look and form factor (no cast in "intake spacers, raised valve covers, etc).

As far as flow numbers, we're getting peak numbers of about 325 cfm from them out of the box. On our same bench, out of the box victors flowed about 330, so they are holding their own with victors out of the box, however because of the raised port and longer valve design of the victors, the victors should have more potential with all out porting then our Stealth stage II. But we are confident the Stealth stage II should easily be an 800-850HP capable head.




Cool, will the price be comparable to the Pro Comp victors? They are about $1200, CNCed.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: moparmafia] #712627
06/01/10 08:10 PM
06/01/10 08:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,245
Between a rock & a hard place
C
cudadoug Offline
master
cudadoug  Offline
master
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,245
Between a rock & a hard place
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I guess I'm confused, I see a lot of bracket cars at the track running stock heads, I see stock eliminator cars running stock heads, and I'm guessing these Stealth heads flow better than stock from what I have read.
Why would they not be race worthy if they flow better than stock both out of the box and ported?
I would think it would depend on what you wanted to do and how fast you want to go. I see no reason why a set these CNC ported Stealth heads wouldn't be fine for a 3500lb bracket car running 10's all day long.




I guess that all depends on how fast you want to go. Mid 10's to me isn't what it used to be. Compare flow numbers of maxxed out Stealths to almost anything Indy makes but especially their top shelf stuff. Now compare this stuff to the better Ford and Chevy heads. I stand by what I said.




i think most people get caught up on flow numbers and dyno numbers. we might not have the most peak flow but the stock mopar heads have very good velocity and make good power. i have ran mopars my whole adult life and i have outrun many a ford and chevies that have higher flow numbers and an impressive dyno sheet. my very mild 1977 400 with stock 452 heads was out running my friends 93 mustang with edelbrock heads cam and intake. but man did his flow sheet look good. lol




I would agree 100% with this statement. I once ran a TRW flat top 440 (12+ years ago) going 10.30s @ 128 with 906 heads (263 peak CFM) at 3250-ish lbs. All of the "experts" said "no way, gotta be a stroker, where's the bottle"...I heard it all. Head flow, is just that: head flow, which is PART of the overall combo...

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: B1Fish540] #712628
06/01/10 08:36 PM
06/01/10 08:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
B
BobR Offline
master
BobR  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I guess I'm confused, I see a lot of bracket cars at the track running stock heads, I see stock eliminator cars running stock heads, and I'm guessing these Stealth heads flow better than stock from what I have read.
Why would they not be race worthy if they flow better than stock both out of the box and ported?
I would think it would depend on what you wanted to do and how fast you want to go. I see no reason why a set these CNC ported Stealth heads wouldn't be fine for a 3500lb bracket car running 10's all day long.




I guess that all depends on how fast you want to go. Mid 10's to me isn't what it used to be. Compare flow numbers of maxxed out Stealths to almost anything Indy makes but especially their top shelf stuff. Now compare this stuff to the better Ford and Chevy heads. I stand by what I said.




440Source does not claim that it is a race head. That is totally NOT its purpose. Its a stock replacement(almost identical)and is supposed to make a "stock looking" motor faster than it looks. And I think it succeeds for its intended purpose...plus, it is cheap. This may tempt alot of guys to use it for bracket or other limited type of racing. Just like the Eddy RPM. The flow numbers are pretty much the same for both. The RPM may look more like a race head but its not much better than a maxed out 906 iron head ..just like the Stealth. The BB Chev head, by its design, is an inherently a good flowing head just like a Hemi. So, you almost have to compare the BB mopar to a SB chevy...thats what it most closely resembles and the power can go from the most wimpy to fairly muscular...but not until serious changes are made in the design..ports, valve size and length etc etc,. Then you have a head that does not even look stock any more. The ports are much bigger and raised, the plugs are relocated and the head itself is taller and wider.




I agree.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: moparmanjames] #712629
06/01/10 08:40 PM
06/01/10 08:40 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
B
BobR Offline
master
BobR  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I guess I'm confused, I see a lot of bracket cars at the track running stock heads, I see stock eliminator cars running stock heads, and I'm guessing these Stealth heads flow better than stock from what I have read.
Why would they not be race worthy if they flow better than stock both out of the box and ported?
I would think it would depend on what you wanted to do and how fast you want to go. I see no reason why a set these CNC ported Stealth heads wouldn't be fine for a 3500lb bracket car running 10's all day long.




I guess that all depends on how fast you want to go. Mid 10's to me isn't what it used to be. Compare flow numbers of maxxed out Stealths to almost anything Indy makes but especially their top shelf stuff. Now compare this stuff to the better Ford and Chevy heads. I stand by what I said.




So basically you agree that they are fine for a mid 10 second bracket car or slower, yes?
It seems that 10 seconds or slower is what 70% of the people are running at the track, basically most of Pro Bracket along with sportsman/street.

These are race cars too you know.

BTW I have a set of maxxed out Indy SR's that flow around 345 and I love them too.




Can't argue with that. Just realize that with the Stealths there isn't much room for growth and there won't be much resale value.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712630
06/01/10 08:42 PM
06/01/10 08:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
RAMM Offline
super stock
RAMM  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
First of all the Victor is not that great of a head. On my SF-1020, 4.375" fixture, 28" of water the victors went a best of 317 or 319 @ .650". I was not all that thrilled-so I cut and cut and cut,,, etc. I managed a peak of 357 cfm after many hours of work @ .700-.750" lift. So this engine went onto our Sf-902 and we struggled to make 720 hp and 652 ft/lbs from 471 cubes on pump fuel. To make a long story short the Victors have left a foul taste in my mouth and without the benefit of 13-1+ compression they would have a hard time cresting 800HP on a realistic dyno. As a matter of fact I have a 512 combo going together right now that will have some Stealth heads on it that flow 284-288 on our bench. It will have a hydro flat tappet cam 9.5 to 1 and I expect 550-570 hp @ 5300rpm. The Stealth heads are what they are! A LOT better than 906/452/346 OEM cast junk (oh and inexpensive). J.Rob


2009 PHR\EMC Competitor
2010 PHR\EMC Competitor
2011 PHR\EMC Competitor
2012 PHR\EMC Competitor
2013 PHR\EMC Competitor
2014 HotRod/EMC Competitor
2015 HotRod/EMC NoShow
2016 HotRod/EMC 3rd place SPEC Bigblock
2018 HotRod/EMC 7th place G3
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: RAMM] #712631
06/01/10 08:43 PM
06/01/10 08:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
B
BobR Offline
master
BobR  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
Quote:

First of all the Victor is not that great of a head. On my SF-1020, 4.375" fixture, 28" of water the victors went a best of 317 or 319 @ .650". I was not all that thrilled-so I cut and cut and cut,,, etc. I managed a peak of 357 cfm after many hours of work @ .700-.750" lift. So this engine went onto our Sf-902 and we struggled to make 720 hp and 652 ft/lbs from 471 cubes on pump fuel. To make a long story short the Victors have left a foul taste in my mouth and without the benefit of 13-1+ compression they would have a hard time cresting 800HP on a realistic dyno. As a matter of fact I have a 512 combo going together right now that will have some Stealth heads on it that flow 284-288 on our bench. It will have a hydro flat tappet cam 9.5 to 1 and I expect 550-570 hp @ 5300rpm. The Stealth heads are what they are! A LOT better than 906/452/346 OEM cast junk (oh and inexpensive). J.Rob




Great post.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: BobR] #712632
06/01/10 08:47 PM
06/01/10 08:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
RAMM Offline
super stock
RAMM  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
Quote:

Quote:

First of all the Victor is not that great of a head. On my SF-1020, 4.375" fixture, 28" of water the victors went a best of 317 or 319 @ .650". I was not all that thrilled-so I cut and cut and cut,,, etc. I managed a peak of 357 cfm after many hours of work @ .700-.750" lift. So this engine went onto our Sf-902 and we struggled to make 720 hp and 652 ft/lbs from 471 cubes on pump fuel. To make a long story short the Victors have left a foul taste in my mouth and without the benefit of 13-1+ compression they would have a hard time cresting 800HP on a realistic dyno. As a matter of fact I have a 512 combo going together right now that will have some Stealth heads on it that flow 284-288 on our bench. It will have a hydro flat tappet cam 9.5 to 1 and I expect 550-570 hp @ 5300rpm. The Stealth heads are what they are! A LOT better than 906/452/346 OEM cast junk (oh and inexpensive). J.Rob




Great post.




Are you being facetious Bob?


2009 PHR\EMC Competitor
2010 PHR\EMC Competitor
2011 PHR\EMC Competitor
2012 PHR\EMC Competitor
2013 PHR\EMC Competitor
2014 HotRod/EMC Competitor
2015 HotRod/EMC NoShow
2016 HotRod/EMC 3rd place SPEC Bigblock
2018 HotRod/EMC 7th place G3
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: RAMM] #712633
06/01/10 09:01 PM
06/01/10 09:01 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
California
E
Erik Jones Offline
member
Erik Jones  Offline
member
E

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
California
We have tested the 440 source head and have good results. Pretty good quality for the money. They will never flow the Big numbers that some people claim they need but are a very good upgarde for the money.

I have developed a pretty good upgrade for these heads if anyone is interested. I applied the Same Technology to these heads as we use on our 383/440 Superstock heads and have had great results!

I will be glad to answer any questions!

Erik Jones
www.jonesenginedevelopment.com
661-942-3364

Last edited by Erik Jones; 06/01/10 09:04 PM.
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712634
08/29/11 11:01 PM
08/29/11 11:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,085
NotRussia
2
2fast4yourBrain Offline
Whack top Dodger
2fast4yourBrain  Offline
Whack top Dodger
2

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,085
NotRussia
Quote:



Yes, our Stealth stage II heads are out of design and development and are currently in the pattern/tooling production stage. They may hit the market by the end of the year.





Update???

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 2fast4yourBrain] #712635
08/30/11 02:16 AM
08/30/11 02:16 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
440sourcedotcom Offline
super stock
440sourcedotcom  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
Quote:

Quote:



Yes, our Stealth stage II heads are out of design and development and are currently in the pattern/tooling production stage. They may hit the market by the end of the year.





Update???




They are currently IN STOCK, however they are so new we have not yet listed them on our website. Look for them to be "officially" for sale in the next couple weeks. Price should be $995/pair, sold BARE only.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712636
08/30/11 02:39 AM
08/30/11 02:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
moparmanjames Offline
pro stock
moparmanjames  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:



Yes, our Stealth stage II heads are out of design and development and are currently in the pattern/tooling production stage. They may hit the market by the end of the year.





Update???




They are currently IN STOCK, however they are so new we have not yet listed them on our website. Look for them to be "officially" for sale in the next couple weeks. Price should be $995/pair, sold BARE only.




I have had trouble with pushrod clearance on these type of heads when using 1.6 ratio rockers or higher, have you guys made any modifications for this or will I still have to clearance the pushrod holes when using higher ratio rockers?
Thanks!

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712637
08/30/11 02:45 AM
08/30/11 02:45 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
dOc ! Offline
The village idiot's idiot
dOc !  Offline
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
Quote:



They are currently IN STOCK, however they are so new we have not yet listed them on our website. Look for them to be "officially" for sale in the next couple weeks. Price should be $995/pair, sold BARE only.




Who would you recommend for putting a complete package together? .. and at what cost? ...same valve sizes as #1?

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: dOc !] #712638
08/30/11 09:57 AM
08/30/11 09:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,412
Johnstown
69dart Offline
pro stock
69dart  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,412
Johnstown
I'm planning to put a set of Stealths on my old 383 that I rebuild last winter. Hoping for about 450 HP.


33 Plymouth Roadster - 383 - 5.90 1/8th 9.58 1/4
68 Dart - 340
66 Belvedere - 400

Windy Hollow Garage - https://www.youtube.com/@windyhollowgarage
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712639
08/30/11 10:33 AM
08/30/11 10:33 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
They are currently IN STOCK, however they are so new we have not yet listed them on our website. Look for them to be "officially" for sale in the next couple weeks. Price should be $995/pair, sold BARE only.




What length valve are you calling out for this new head
so the rockers will work correctly

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: MR_P_BODY] #712640
08/30/11 02:57 PM
08/30/11 02:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
440sourcedotcom Offline
super stock
440sourcedotcom  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
Our new heads (which will be called "Super Stealth") use a stock length valve. When you get into longer valves, you must raise the valve cover rail by a corresponding length, which also increases the overall exterior height of the head. At that point, it becomes impossible to keep the factory 'look' on the exterior of the casting. Plus, because the bowl area was opened up considerably and port roof was raised as far as possible, we were getting flow numbers that we wanted without feeling we needed to go to longer valves.

On the question of pushrod clearance, the "dog leg" or turn in the intake ports has been almost completely removed in these heads. This requires them to use a .650" offset intake rocker. We chose this offset because it is identical to what the Edelbrock Victor head uses, ensuring there are many rocker arm manufacturers (Harland Sharp) etc, making these. We also carry our own version available on our web site at: http://store.440source.com/650-Offset-Aluminum-Roller-Rockers_shafts-15-Ratio/productinfo/200-1125/

Because of the offset rockers, we had to completely relocate and enlarge the intake pushrod holes. We made the holes as large as we could, and out of all the test engines we used, not a single one had any pushrod clearancing problems. However, (as they say) YOUR MILEAGE MAY VARY. You should always do a mockup before final assembly and check for clearancing. Too many factors affect pushrod placement to put an engine together without checking it first. Also, our 1.5 rockers outsell our 1.6's by a factor of at least 10 to 1, so all our test engines were fitted with 1.5 rockers. So using 1.6's would likely increase the chances (if any) that clearancing would be required.

Hope this answers your questions, thanks for your interest. These new heads have been several years in the making. Eventually we hope to have a CNC version available from Jeff.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712641
08/30/11 03:03 PM
08/30/11 03:03 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
dOc ! Offline
The village idiot's idiot
dOc !  Offline
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
Projected cost of the total package ?

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: dOc !] #712642
08/30/11 05:12 PM
08/30/11 05:12 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
440sourcedotcom Offline
super stock
440sourcedotcom  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
Quote:

Projected cost of the total package ?




There isn't really a specific "package", although we'd be happy to put together a quote for everything you'll need based on your particular situation.

The only components which are "specific" to these heads are eight .650" offset intake rockers. You can buy these complete as a set, or if you already have rockers, you can still use eight of your standard rockers, plus the standard shafts, holddowns, shims, etc. All you need to buy are the eight individual offset arms themselves. One other fact to mention is that because the rockers are moved over so far, eight of the pushrods will be slightly diagonal, which may require a tiny bit of extra length. In almost all the test engines, we were able to use one of our off the shelf pushrods, but you should always use a checking tool to measure correct pushrod length before ordering pushrods, or get our cut to fit pushrod set, so you don't have to worry about getting the wrong length.

Depending on how much power you want to make from the heads, there are several different ways you can go for the valves. The heads do come with a "production" valve job setup for 2.14 valves, but this valve job is really just a starting point. We expect most people at the minimum will want to do a custom competition valve job along with some bowl cleanup and port matching. For this we do sell nice sets of stainless valves which work great. If you're planning on significantly opening up the ports, you'll most likely want to go with a 2.19 or larger valve. Any big block Chrysler length valves will work.

We expect these heads to run with a healthy camshaft, so you'll want to match the springs to your cam based on the cam manufacturers recommendations, and you'll want to go with some premium 10 deg locks and retainers as well.

All the above reasons are why we only sell these heads bare. They are designed as a head to be built as part of a serious performance engine, not a "bolt on" deal, where you do a head swap in a couple hours and are back on the road after lunch.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712643
08/30/11 05:22 PM
08/30/11 05:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,141
junction city oregon
V
viperblue72 Offline
top fuel
viperblue72  Offline
top fuel
V

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,141
junction city oregon
Brandon,
So these heads will be standard port or max wedge? 75cc chamber, 2.14. 1.81??

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #712644
08/30/11 05:26 PM
08/30/11 05:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
moparmanjames Offline
pro stock
moparmanjames  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
Brandon, I didn't see you guys at the last Mopars at the Strip, will you be there next year?

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: moparmanjames] #712645
08/30/11 06:29 PM
08/30/11 06:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 862
Iowa State fan
kilroy Offline
super stock
kilroy  Offline
super stock

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 862
Iowa State fan
Have to say the STEALTH 2 actually have me a little excited about a new set of head. No stupid intake spacer cast in, standard gear, 325cfm. COOL!

x2 on the chamber volume and shape

also what about the Intake and Exhaust runners's CC?


1973 Charger, former SE, former auto

I'm not trying to be difficult, it comes naturally....
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: kilroy] #712646
08/30/11 07:22 PM
08/30/11 07:22 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
440sourcedotcom Offline
super stock
440sourcedotcom  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
We should be at MATS next year. These heads use the same 80cc "closed chamber" design as our standard Stealths, with straight spark plugs. The port window is not max wedge, but it is essentially an enlarged or "port matched" version of a standard port size. Factory spec on port windows is 2.27 x 1.23, and factory heads are usually considerably smaller than this. Our port window size spec is 2.33 x 1.28, although port window size ends up being determined by the size/position of the sand core molds, so they are not accurate to the thousandth by any means.

As far as CFM and port CC's, etc, we are not officially advertising these, because these heads are being sold only as a rough starting point. What your shop does to them, including what size/type of valves used, valve job, level of porting, etc will determine these numbers. We'll see what some cylinder head shops can do and have them advertise their specs and numbers. I'm sure we'll be setting up a partnership with Jeff at Modern for something like this. Once this is setup, we'll publish the numbers and specs he supplies.

Also, these are currently available for purchase. The part number for one bare head is 200-1127, so be sure to order a quantity of two for a set. They are not listed on our web store yet, but they can be ordered over the phone through a salesperson. Cost is $499.95 per head.

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: BobR] #712647
02/11/12 12:01 AM
02/11/12 12:01 AM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853
Pattison Texas
CSK Offline
master
CSK  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853
Pattison Texas
the stupid stealths flow the same as the old stealth heads out of the box oh super stealth 267 cfm @ .550


1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI
512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim
2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: CSK] #712648
02/11/12 04:38 AM
02/11/12 04:38 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 461
Hinterland SE Qld Aust
S
SG duster Offline
mopar
SG duster  Offline
mopar
S

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 461
Hinterland SE Qld Aust
I would think 267cfm @ only 550" for a short valve head "out of the box" cyl head is quite resonable. what are that at 700"? and what did you get with a bit of port work? the source says they sell them blank so to do what you like with them. its an open envelope

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: CSK] #712649
02/11/12 03:32 PM
02/11/12 03:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,949
land of 10,000______'s
B
BDS871Cuda Offline
top fuel
BDS871Cuda  Offline
top fuel
B

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,949
land of 10,000______'s
Quote:

the stupid stealths flow the same as the old stealth heads out of the box oh super stealth 267 cfm @ .550






You read the ad and 440 source says 875 HP and up
with their stroker kit and their super stealth
heads. You only fool yourself into thinking
how easy it is. You buy a $500 head and you get
a $500 head. Everybody wants the most HP for the
least amount $$$. Super Stealth's 100-150 HP
over regular Stealth heads without a major head
mod like Victor heads over RPM's? REALLY??? !~!

Like I said, you buy a $500 head, you get a $500
head... nothing more nothing less.


Snap your neck, mega G-force launch, is all I want!
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: SG duster] #712650
02/11/12 03:32 PM
02/11/12 03:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853
Pattison Texas
CSK Offline
master
CSK  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853
Pattison Texas
thats it they stop @ 550


1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI
512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim
2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5

Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: RAMM] #712651
02/11/12 05:59 PM
02/11/12 05:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
RAMM Offline
super stock
RAMM  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
Quote:

As a matter of fact I have a 512 combo going together right now that will have some Stealth heads on it that flow 284-288 on our bench. It will have a hydro flat tappet cam 9.5 to 1 and I expect 550-570 hp @ 5300rpm. J.Rob




Just saw this post and the 512 wound up making a whopping 523 hp and 583 ft.lbs. Yeah--I thought that was terrible and it is, although I think the cam and low compression has a major role in that. At least the 65 year old dude that owns it thinks its awesome. I have built '452 headed 451's that exceeed that with not much work at all. IF you just have to have aluminum heads then go for it, if you want to go fast then talk to somebody that knows. J.Rob


2009 PHR\EMC Competitor
2010 PHR\EMC Competitor
2011 PHR\EMC Competitor
2012 PHR\EMC Competitor
2013 PHR\EMC Competitor
2014 HotRod/EMC Competitor
2015 HotRod/EMC NoShow
2016 HotRod/EMC 3rd place SPEC Bigblock
2018 HotRod/EMC 7th place G3
Re: 440 source stealth heads: GOOD?? BAD?? [Re: RAMM] #712652
02/13/12 06:46 PM
02/13/12 06:46 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853
Pattison Texas
CSK Offline
master
CSK  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853
Pattison Texas
ok did a little reshaping on short side ,opened up the roof 320@.600 2.14 valve not bad at all will work on seats for low & mid lift flow & post my results & thats just a little work,will turn off my phone & close the shop doors & see what more i can get note to all these are SUPER STEALTH HEADS FROM 440 SOURCE FOR A STOCK LOOKING HEAD ITS DARN GOOD moral of the story is out of box not so great,just a little grinding & sandpaper roll work,dang good so far, more to come ck


1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI
512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim
2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1