Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: stealth vs 906 Heads [Re: Coronet-R/T-Rag] #637396
03/15/10 06:02 PM
03/15/10 06:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 51
bristol tn
J
jbcuda Offline
member
jbcuda  Offline
member
J

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 51
bristol tn
Mine done the same thing bout two months ago so I ordered stealths and hopefully get to put them on shortly they look great

Re: stealth vs 906 Heads [Re: jbcuda] #637397
03/15/10 06:38 PM
03/15/10 06:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,162
CT
GTX MATT Offline
master
GTX MATT  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,162
CT
Roy, I would go with the Stealths. One of the magazines tested a pretty average 440 back to back with 906 heads and the Edelbrocks, which flow in the range of the Stealths, probably just a little more. Anyway, it was a 440, 9:1, Comp XE268 (which is similar to your cam, just a tighter lobe seperation with 112 degrees and its 224/230 duration. Eddy RPM intake and 1 7/8 headers. They dynoed 399 with the 906 heads, and 473 ft lbs of torque. With the Eddies it was 456 horsepower and 514 ft lbs of torque. Peak torque was at the same RPM and peak horsepower went up only 200 rpm.

I think even a stock HP engine would benefit 20-30 horse from Eddies or Stealths.


Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat
Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
Re: stealth vs 906 Heads [Re: GTX MATT] #637398
03/16/10 02:34 AM
03/16/10 02:34 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 324
GA
R
roy2345 Offline OP
enthusiast
roy2345  Offline OP
enthusiast
R

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 324
GA
not porting the 906 just 3 angle valve job.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1