Re: 67 - 383 4bb. rebuild
[Re: Tinman761]
#614196
02/15/10 10:08 PM
02/15/10 10:08 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
yes, the 440source heads flow as well as edelbrock RPM heads, so they are 500+ Hp capable out of the box, they look almost identical to cast iron heads, and they have straight spark plugs unlike the eddys.
that intake is a low rise dual plane intake, and can easily pass for an original, so yes, that combo could be done and look stock on the outside.
a cheaper route for some simple stop light fun would be some high compression pistons, and a decent cam, factory iron heads will support 450-500 hp pretty easily, and would be a lot cheaper than a big dollar, aluminum headed stroker motor.
but, a stock stroke 383 running on pump gas would probably max out at 400-450 hp, and still be a fun street cruiser
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
Re: 67 - 383 4bb. rebuild
[Re: Tinman761]
#614199
02/16/10 01:47 AM
02/16/10 01:47 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
It would take a lot of $ invested to get them to flow enough for 500hp, especially on a 383. The stealth heads look stock to most people and their cost is reasonable. Quote:
what would you suggest as far as a rear gear? i'm not sure what is in there now. i pulled the tranny at the same time, to have it freshend up also. any suggestions for that also? thanks,Joe
Again, it depends on your intended usage and your motor build(cam, compression and converter are the big ones). I always say go with as much rear gear as you can stand to drive. If you plan on doing a lot of highway driving, you typically only want to go so far. You can play with this calculator to help yourself decide:
http://vexer.com/68rt/speed.html
|
|
|
Re: 67 - 383 4bb. rebuild
[Re: Tinman761]
#614201
02/17/10 12:02 AM
02/17/10 12:02 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647 IL
71383beep
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
|
If that is truly a 67 motor and its never been apart then you should have the closed chamber 516's which are a good starting spot. They can make good power...especially in the 400 to 450 range...trust me because I am running them now! Compression is the larger part of the battle for 383's becasue the aftermarket pistons are way down in the hole for compression. Don't use the guides available on manufactures websites to calculate compression. If you go with KB's at least go with the 400's as opposed to the 162's. Get a good cam in the 230+ w/ .470+ range and you're good to go. As you probably already know though the limiting factor will be the intake and exhaust. The stock carb will be taxed a bit too. To be honest 400 hp may be pushing it a bit...
'73 GK6 Challenger Rallye - 340 4-Speed
|
|
|
Re: 67 - 383 4bb. rebuild
[Re: 71383beep]
#614203
02/18/10 12:59 AM
02/18/10 12:59 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 902 Seattle, WA
rss
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 902
Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
Compression is the larger part of the battle for 383's becasue the aftermarket pistons are way down in the hole for compression
Don't mean to hijack, but several have suggested bumping compression up.
What would you guys suggest for maximum compression for 383 with iron heads running pump gas?
|
|
|
Re: 67 - 383 4bb. rebuild
[Re: rss]
#614204
02/18/10 02:50 AM
02/18/10 02:50 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647 IL
71383beep
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
|
Not more than 9.5:1.
However cam choice can affect this somewhat, but this is good rule of thumb per say.
'73 GK6 Challenger Rallye - 340 4-Speed
|
|
|
|
|