Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Big difference going from 3.23's to 3.73's? [Re: Paul_Fancsali] #582511
01/15/10 06:21 PM
01/15/10 06:21 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,978
Moncton, New Brunswick
hemidart1 Offline OP
top fuel
hemidart1  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,978
Moncton, New Brunswick
I have a car trailer for the long hauls anyhow.
As far as having enough cam to support the rpm's I think my cam is stock-
have a listen and tell me if you think it's stock.

video


1967 Hemi GTX
1969 Chrysler 300
Re: Big difference going from 3.23's to 3.73's? [Re: hemidart1] #582512
01/17/10 04:18 PM
01/17/10 04:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,931
P
Paul_Fancsali Offline
master
Paul_Fancsali  Offline
master
P

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,931
Does not sound stock unless stock is the HP 383 cam as in the 330 or 335 horse engine I owned a 69 383 sport sat with a 4spdanditsounded thesame as my brothers 69 383 road runner which I'm sure is stock and the block numbers on engine ID pad in the front were the same, all the325 horse 383 Iahve driven in and or rode in when I was kid all sounded very mild and smooth idle. Frankly stock is a ??? here but newer repo cam may have been tweeked

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1