Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
#494886
10/12/09 09:41 AM
10/12/09 09:41 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552 Michigan
Kiddart
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Michigan
|
What are the pros and cons if any using the Unlawful rear trianulated system versus the cal trac. Is there a 60 foot delta or is this system more for handeling. can someone shead some light on the differences?? Thanks __________________ Kiddart1
Thank you Kiddart
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: Stanton]
#494888
10/12/09 10:50 AM
10/12/09 10:50 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552 Michigan
Kiddart
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Michigan
|
Is there an advantage to the triangulated system or not I didnt get that out of your responce. Cal trac advertises better 60ft times.
Thank you Kiddart
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: Stanton]
#494889
10/12/09 12:10 PM
10/12/09 12:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,871 Smyrna, South Carolina
STEFF
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,871
Smyrna, South Carolina
|
Quote:
The triangulated systems are NOT afternoon bolt-in jobs. The short upper bars on the triangulated systems and the amount of adjustment on both upper and lower bars limit their HP level.
My guess is the HP limitations of both are about the same. The next level would be back-halfing the car.
I guess you've never seen any of the many Fox Body Mustangs racing all over the country, be it Drag Radial or NMRA Hot Street or NMCA Pro Stock etc.... Fox Body Mustangs came from the factory with a triangulated style rear suspension. A good "stock suspension" Mustang is capable of 60 footing in the high 1-teens - low 1.20's & handle 1500-1600 hp as a guess? I'm not sure the exact HP the drag radial guys are running, but a few have gone around 7.40's at about 3400 lbs.
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: STEFF]
#494890
10/12/09 12:22 PM
10/12/09 12:22 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552 Michigan
Kiddart
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Michigan
|
So I guess it may be worth the $3995.00 if i was competitive, since i amd a street strip car I cant justify the dollars. thanks for the help i greatly appreciate it
Thank you Kiddart
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: Kiddart]
#494891
10/12/09 12:36 PM
10/12/09 12:36 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,365 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,365
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
You can be rolling around on the full Cal-Trac setup for less than a grand. It may not be quite as good as the other setup, but sure is a lot cheaper and works VERY well. CHIP
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: Kiddart]
#494892
10/12/09 12:39 PM
10/12/09 12:39 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,586 Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana
ProStDodge
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,586
Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana
|
There are a lot of very fast cars on Cal-tracks and the price is reasonable. The bars are $340. For a little better tuning you can get the mono-leaf springs for another $298. And then a set of good adjustable shocks $178pr. You might want to look into the RMS "Street-Lynx" setup which is about $1795 (same guy that makes the Alter-k-tion front ends). It is also a triangulated 4-bar setup which will require some welding, but is a fairly easy installation. RMS Street-Lynx Please contact me if you need anything. Scott
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: ProStDodge]
#494893
10/12/09 12:53 PM
10/12/09 12:53 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552 Michigan
Kiddart
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Michigan
|
Thanks for all this info guys!!! this is why I love Moparts and having a mopar!!!
Thanks Again
Thank you Kiddart
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: Kiddart]
#494894
10/12/09 12:55 PM
10/12/09 12:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,443 Northern N.J.
hemi_doug
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,443
Northern N.J.
|
Go with the caltracs and don't look back....plenty of guys in the 9s running them...And you can install them in the driveway with a hand fiull of tools.
71 440-6 4spd & 69 Hemi 4spd
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: hemi_doug]
#494895
10/12/09 01:07 PM
10/12/09 01:07 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,586 Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana
ProStDodge
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,586
Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana
|
Quote:
Go with the caltracs and don't look back....plenty of guys in the 9s running them...And you can install them in the driveway with a hand fiull of tools.
Yes, but once installed, I HIGHLY recommend you weld straps (gussets) from the front and back of the spring perches to the top of the axle housing, as all that extra torque can damage the axle tubes - Been there-done that.
Scott
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: ProStDodge]
#494896
10/12/09 02:33 PM
10/12/09 02:33 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552 Michigan
Kiddart
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Michigan
|
can you take a picture I just bought the caltrac set up should be at my house for the weekend. showing the welded straps or gussets
Thank you Kiddart
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: Kiddart]
#494897
10/12/09 03:09 PM
10/12/09 03:09 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 705 Michigan
Hemiroid
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 705
Michigan
|
Quote:
can you take a picture I just bought the caltrac set up should be at my house for the weekend. showing the welded straps or gussets
Not the greatest drawing, but you should be able to see what to do from it
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: Kiddart]
#494898
10/12/09 03:11 PM
10/12/09 03:11 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,586 Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana
ProStDodge
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,586
Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana
|
Don't have a good pic at the moment, but will get one for you. If you had gotten the Cal-Tracs from me, I would have included the straps. I have seen 3 cars with damaged axle tubes from the spring perch crushing into the tube. These were all 8-3/4 housings and in cars running in the 11's. In one case, the rear end moved enough to allow the tire to hit the wheel lip, cutting the tire severely at the top end of the track. The extra brace will help prevent that from happening. I use a piece of 3/16 bar, 1" wide and wrap it from the front of the spring perch, over the axle tube to the back of the perch. Welding it at both ends and stitch welding it to the tube (avoid excessive heat which could warp the tube). This makes the spring perch MUCH stronger. OOPS !! Hemiroid beat me to it - not a bad drawing (upside down), but I still like to go all the way over the tube. Also--for the Cal-Tracks to work "right" you want to make sure you have enough front end travel to allow for roll rotation of the car. The magic number according to John Calvert is 5". You can check that by measuring your front wheel lip height at rest, then jack the front of the car up until the wheel start to leave the ground, and re-measure. If you don't have enough travel, lower your torsion bars (evenly). You may need taller front tires to keep your ride height. Scott
Last edited by ProStDodge; 10/12/09 03:21 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: Kiddart]
#494901
10/13/09 05:12 PM
10/13/09 05:12 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,675 Ortonville, MI
RoadRnnr69
Keyster
|
Keyster
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,675
Ortonville, MI
|
Scot, based on your posts it looks like you already made your mind up on the cal tracs. The Unlawful system is nothing like the street links. I see a lot of people racing and cruising with the alterkation front ends but havn't seen anybody racing with the rear ends. No offense but it just doen't look like it can take a lot of power. I am no engineer so it just my opinion. The Unlwaful system can take a ton of power where the street links seems to be more for street use. The cal tracs do work for racing but not so good for street use, you are basically making the front half of your spring a solid link. This can and sometimes does tear parts of the car if a lot of power is applied to a weak or rusty car. Make sure you have a solid body at the connections for the springs!!! Like any system, cal tracs are just not as simple as bolting it on. There is going to be other stuff you need to change and upgrade. The Unlawful system is complete when you get it, shocks, springs, bolts hangers, everything you need to put it together. All the little stuff adds up. I needed nothing else for this system. You can adjust this system to leave flat and maximize traction, or pull a big wheelie if you want to. It is all how you set the instant center and can be changed at the track in minutes, literally!!. Cal tracs can't change the instant center, only stop the axle wrap. This is very streetable as well!!! My car handles like it's on rails. This system is not a back half but gives you many of the same advantages. One thing about it is that you can easily go back to stock on a valuable musclecar, you can't do that with a back half. Again, this is just the opinion of a guy who uses a particular system and likes it. It has improved my car by .20 second in the quarter. I have my flack jacket on so fire away!!
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: RoadRnnr69]
#494902
10/13/09 05:29 PM
10/13/09 05:29 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 127 Phoenix, Arizona
HerboldRacing
member
|
member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 127
Phoenix, Arizona
|
Quote:
Cal tracs can't change the instant center, only stop the axle wrap.
Not true - you can change the IC of a car with Caltracs by selecting either the top hole or the bottom hole. Top hole brings the IC back, bottom hole brings it forward.
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: RoadRnnr69]
#494903
10/13/09 06:40 PM
10/13/09 06:40 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552 Michigan
Kiddart
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Michigan
|
I do truely understand the pros and cons now. I did stop the order from the airport this morning before I left for Saltillo Mexico. I have a very long winter to think this over. Its a tuff decision, especially when the money tree is bare unlike a few years back. Mr. Irons thanks for the blunt truth I do appreciate it and yes good solid proven part come at a price that i do know for sure. Currently right now my dart on the average is a 1.43 to 1.45 60 foot at milan. I think that is prety good for super stock springs. I could be wrong. I will be doing some more research soon so please be patient with me. Kiddart1 AKA Scot Bigelow
Thank you Kiddart
|
|
|
Re: Caltracs Versus Triangulated system from Unlawfuls
[Re: HerboldRacing]
#494904
10/13/09 07:08 PM
10/13/09 07:08 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,675 Ortonville, MI
RoadRnnr69
Keyster
|
Keyster
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,675
Ortonville, MI
|
Quote:
Quote:
Cal tracs can't change the instant center, only stop the axle wrap.
Not true - you can change the IC of a car with Caltracs by selecting either the top hole or the bottom hole. Top hole brings the IC back, bottom hole brings it forward.
But is there only two adjustment points?
|
|
|
|
|