Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
These new engines #3181628
10/06/23 10:43 AM
10/06/23 10:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
The number one reason these engine are not being used is no Distributor, it’s not cost effective without another 2 grand worth of electrical stuff, plus the big money for someone to tune it. A real shame since the engine is a great platform.

Re: These new engines [Re: cudaman1969] #3181681
10/06/23 12:59 PM
10/06/23 12:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
MSD hemi6 is not $2000

Holley finally came out with a decent looking intake for a carb with a decent price too boot!

Between MSD hemi6, Holley intake and a new carb you can still be under $2000 for all of that combined.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: These new engines [Re: cudaman1969] #3181682
10/06/23 01:00 PM
10/06/23 01:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
You would spend more on a set of trickflows for a SB and still not make as much power as a JY 5.7 with that set up on top of it.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: These new engines [Re: HotRodDave] #3181724
10/06/23 03:45 PM
10/06/23 03:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
No, buying all new stuff would put BOTH Gen III and the LA engine in same ballpark BUT there’s tons of cheap good parts out there for the LA or Magnum platform plus one can pick them up from the yards for $100 to $300. The lowest Ive seen for a 5.7 is $1500 then you’ll spend $2000 for all the extras to get it in car and running, very little used stuff out there yet for them. Let alone the 392 engines It’s not a bargain basement engine. Be realistic

Re: These new engines [Re: cudaman1969] #3181745
10/06/23 05:47 PM
10/06/23 05:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
No, buying all new stuff would put BOTH Gen III and the LA engine in same ballpark BUT there’s tons of cheap good parts out there for the LA or Magnum platform plus one can pick them up from the yards for $100 to $300. The lowest Ive seen for a 5.7 is $1500 then you’ll spend $2000 for all the extras to get it in car and running, very little used stuff out there yet for them. Let alone the 392 engines It’s not a bargain basement engine. Be realistic


Gonna have a real hard time building a $3500 SB that will make the power a JY 5.7 will with that carb and intake. Heck whatever carb you use on the SB would work on the hemi so really you buy the MSD and intake.


PS... I have bought several 6.4s under $1000, you just got to know where to look just like finding real good cheap SB goodies... I just had a long block show up in a crate for $900 total including shipping with just a bad cam, I have never even heard of a pair $900 SB heads that flow 340 CFM much less a long block less cam 392 CID SB for that price.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: These new engines [Re: HotRodDave] #3181848
10/07/23 08:21 AM
10/07/23 08:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
Originally Posted by HotRodDave
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
No, buying all new stuff would put BOTH Gen III and the LA engine in same ballpark BUT there’s tons of cheap good parts out there for the LA or Magnum platform plus one can pick them up from the yards for $100 to $300. The lowest Ive seen for a 5.7 is $1500 then you’ll spend $2000 for all the extras to get it in car and running, very little used stuff out there yet for them. Let alone the 392 engines It’s not a bargain basement engine. Be realistic


Gonna have a real hard time building a $3500 SB that will make the power a JY 5.7 will with that carb and intake. Heck whatever carb you use on the SB would work on the hemi so really you buy the MSD and intake.


PS... I have bought several 6.4s under $1000, you just got to know where to look just like finding real good cheap SB goodies... I just had a long block show up in a crate for $900 total including shipping with just a bad cam, I have never even heard of a pair $900 SB heads that flow 340 CFM much less a long block less cam 392 CID SB for that price.


I have $1100 in a 360-380 that I put together with ported heads, adjustable rockers, better springs pushrods and guide plates, M1intake plus everything new inside that will make more power than a stock 5.7. And it will drop right in any car with no special mounts, oil pan, high dollar headers or special pully brackets etc. All that additional stuff adds up quick. But if ya got deep pockets go for it.

Re: These new engines [Re: cudaman1969] #3181864
10/07/23 09:28 AM
10/07/23 09:28 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,838
NW Indiana
F
fbs63 Offline
top fuel
fbs63  Offline
top fuel
F

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,838
NW Indiana
I think it's more the power potential they have with stock parts. A boosted Gen III can make 4 digit HP.

Re: These new engines [Re: cudaman1969] #3181868
10/07/23 10:05 AM
10/07/23 10:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
In its first year Chrysler’s press release said the new 5.7 was
“6% more fuel efficient”
than the previous Magnum 5.9V8

a portion of that must have been no distributor drive
another portion 2 spark plugs per cylinder
another portion thinner piston rings
another portion higher dynamic compression ratio

Re: These new engines [Re: 360view] #3181972
10/07/23 03:15 PM
10/07/23 03:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by 360view
In its first year Chrysler’s press release said the new 5.7 was
“6% more fuel efficient”
than the previous Magnum 5.9V8

a portion of that must have been no distributor drive
another portion 2 spark plugs per cylinder
another portion thinner piston rings
another portion higher dynamic compression ratio



Also much improved windage with the oil from the top end bypassing the spinning crank and a good windage tray. Plastic intake keeping the air going into the engine 100 degrees cooler than the magnum could. Bone stock heads flow as much as a heavily ported SB head. Lighter and lower located weight. Crank driven oil pump instead of gear driven.

Also while a 380 crate 360 may make as much as a stock 5.7 it will be more peaky than the 5.7 and it will not touch a 6.4.

I used to make all the same arguments he is for years and years but stuff has changed, 360s are getting harder to find that are not sacked out and the JY prices are going up, new hemis are getting easier to find and cheaper, good parts are coming out at more reasonable prices like the holley intake I mentioned, eagle heads on an early short block is cheap and it makes a beast of an engine especially if you throw in a 6.1 cam with 100% stock parts, those later heads flow as much as heavily worked W2s at high valve lift and will flat destroy a W2 head at lower valve lifts. You don't need any special pulleys and stuff, I don't know where that idea comes from, it is all in the JY just like SB stuff and even more so.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: These new engines [Re: HotRodDave] #3182105
10/08/23 08:49 AM
10/08/23 08:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,021
Tulsa OK
Bad340fish Offline
master
Bad340fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,021
Tulsa OK
If you are new to the hobby or starting with a clean slate the bang per buck to go gen III is all there. If you are starting clean it would be smarter to go EFI with a new hemi anyways. You get your fuel system AND ignition system handled in one setup. You can even say that for a old engine platform also.

When you are and ol mopar guy and you have a shed full of parts it makes sense to stay small block.

HotRodDave, you don't happen to have a good 6.4 crank for sale do you?


68 Barracuda Formula S 340
Re: These new engines [Re: cudaman1969] #3182201
10/08/23 02:47 PM
10/08/23 02:47 PM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,111
Usa
A
A39Coronet Offline
super stock
A39Coronet  Offline
super stock
A

Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,111
Usa
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
The number one reason these engine are not being used is no Distributor, it’s not cost effective without another 2 grand worth of electrical stuff, plus the big money for someone to tune it. A real shame since the engine is a great platform.


This is like saying "I'm not buying a model T because it doesn't run on oats and grain like my horse n buggy and this new gasoline stuff is too expensive."

New engines are apples to oranges vs the older stuff. Cam sensors, fuel injection, MAFs, O2 sensors...the list goes on. All of these things are the exact reason why new engines are far and away superior.


Follow my G3 Hemi Barracuda build on Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSDAWczXoZw&list=PLTus_wQu8POADHEeJNJp2nr4NMHEyB9EK

2015 Tri-State Stock Super Stock Champion
2017 Monster Mopar Pro Winner
2018 Monster Mopar No Box Winner
Re: These new engines [Re: 360view] #3182344
10/09/23 01:00 AM
10/09/23 01:00 AM
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 340
Red Deer, Alberta
G
Greenwood Offline
enthusiast
Greenwood  Offline
enthusiast
G

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 340
Red Deer, Alberta
Originally Posted by 360view
In its first year Chrysler’s press release said the new 5.7 was
“6% more fuel efficient”
than the previous Magnum 5.9V8

a portion of that must have been no distributor drive
another portion 2 spark plugs per cylinder
another portion thinner piston rings
another portion higher dynamic compression ratio

That's rather humorous, in hindsight. My last Magnum-powered truck couldn't go 500 km (310 miles) on a tank. My first Hemi easily went 100-150 km further on the same size tank. The Magnum was undrivable in cruise control, as the O/D constantly hunted, even on a relatively flat highway. Hills the Magnum (318) couldn't get up in high gear, with NO load, the Hemi could go up in O/D, with a 3000 lb car on a 2000 lb trailer behind it. I'm now on my 4th Hemi truck. Two weeks ago, I rolled out of Kalispell with a full tank. Drove 65-75 mph all the way home. 665 km. The range indicator showed 224 km to empty when we pulled in the driveway. Same size tank as my old 318 Magnum, in a 4x4 Crew Cab 1500.

Last edited by Greenwood; 10/09/23 01:02 AM.
Re: These new engines [Re: Greenwood] #3182360
10/09/23 07:56 AM
10/09/23 07:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
Another quote I vaguely remember was a few years later when the 5.7 Hemi V8 got its variable length intake runner manifold and variable valve timing.

The official quote was something similar to:

This new 5.7 version can make more Torque at idle RPM
than the old Magnum 5.9 V8 could make at 3200 RPM

But... that plastic tensioner on the timing chain of the later year 5.7 was not an improvement

Re: These new engines [Re: 360view] #3182481
10/09/23 02:41 PM
10/09/23 02:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,405
Michigan
MarkZ Offline
Worthy
MarkZ  Offline
Worthy

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,405
Michigan
I can get 5.7's out of the local pick 'n pull for $250 now.


1987 Fifth Avenue - 512/518/D60
Re: These new engines [Re: MarkZ] #3182535
10/09/23 05:29 PM
10/09/23 05:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,550
Michigan
K
Kiddart Offline
pro stock
Kiddart  Offline
pro stock
K

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,550
Michigan
Mark Z

what pick and pull, I call around and no one ever has a 5.7, 6.1 or 6.4?? I am in Michigan as well.


Thank you
Kiddart
Re: These new engines [Re: Greenwood] #3182618
10/09/23 10:17 PM
10/09/23 10:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
Originally Posted by Greenwood
Originally Posted by 360view
In its first year Chrysler’s press release said the new 5.7 was
“6% more fuel efficient”
than the previous Magnum 5.9V8

a portion of that must have been no distributor drive
another portion 2 spark plugs per cylinder
another portion thinner piston rings
another portion higher dynamic compression ratio

That's rather humorous, in hindsight. My last Magnum-powered truck couldn't go 500 km (310 miles) on a tank. My first Hemi easily went 100-150 km further on the same size tank. The Magnum was undrivable in cruise control, as the O/D constantly hunted, even on a relatively flat highway. Hills the Magnum (318) couldn't get up in high gear, with NO load, the Hemi could go up in O/D, with a 3000 lb car on a 2000 lb trailer behind it. I'm now on my 4th Hemi truck. Two weeks ago, I rolled out of Kalispell with a full tank. Drove 65-75 mph all the way home. 665 km. The range indicator showed 224 km to empty when we pulled in the driveway. Same size tank as my old 318 Magnum, in a 4x4 Crew Cab 1500.

2001 Ram Van, 360 magnum, cruise never hunts at 45 or 75 up and down hills but it is a gas guzzler, 15 mpg tops, torque out the Ying Yang

Re: These new engines [Re: cudaman1969] #3182735
10/10/23 12:43 PM
10/10/23 12:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
Originally Posted by Greenwood
Originally Posted by 360view
In its first year Chrysler’s press release said the new 5.7 was
“6% more fuel efficient”
than the previous Magnum 5.9V8

a portion of that must have been no distributor drive
another portion 2 spark plugs per cylinder
another portion thinner piston rings
another portion higher dynamic compression ratio

That's rather humorous, in hindsight. My last Magnum-powered truck couldn't go 500 km (310 miles) on a tank. My first Hemi easily went 100-150 km further on the same size tank. The Magnum was undrivable in cruise control, as the O/D constantly hunted, even on a relatively flat highway. Hills the Magnum (318) couldn't get up in high gear, with NO load, the Hemi could go up in O/D, with a 3000 lb car on a 2000 lb trailer behind it. I'm now on my 4th Hemi truck. Two weeks ago, I rolled out of Kalispell with a full tank. Drove 65-75 mph all the way home. 665 km. The range indicator showed 224 km to empty when we pulled in the driveway. Same size tank as my old 318 Magnum, in a 4x4 Crew Cab 1500.

2001 Ram Van, 360 magnum, cruise never hunts at 45 or 75 up and down hills but it is a gas guzzler, 15 mpg tops, torque out the Ying Yang


My wife has a 2000 Ram 3500 van 5.9 magnum for a daily driver, we drove it 430 miles yesterday and it never hunts for gears like my 5.7 hemi ram. The TQ down low is great but man it has no power at all compared to the hemi when I want to pass someone. I like the new engines but HATE HATE HATE the new transmissions. I think if the transmission was programmed to actually keep the hemi at lower RPM it would be fine, I had one with a 5 speed in a 2500 ram and could lug it down low and it was just fine, the new automatic just wants to downshift for no reason at all at the mear thought of a hill, heck it downshifts going down a hill! Udderly stupid...


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: These new engines [Re: Bad340fish] #3186878
10/27/23 04:27 PM
10/27/23 04:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,226
ILLINOIS
V
volaredon Offline
top fuel
volaredon  Offline
top fuel
V

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,226
ILLINOIS
Going to look at one with misfire codes. I'm gonna bring my scanner along, how robust are these things internally? I've never dealt with one beyond an oil change. I usually buy 318 powered vehicles.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1