|
Re: 340 Crankshaft question
[Re: 440mopar]
#2574795
11/06/18 12:41 PM
11/06/18 12:41 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,779 Mt.Gilead, Ohio
OhioMopar
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,779
Mt.Gilead, Ohio
|
As far as I know, yes. But there are exceptions.
1969 Dart GTS 340 1969 Super Bee X9 N-96 1969 Coronet R/T X9 N-96 2015 Dodge Dart GT 2019 Ram 2500 Big Horn. Looking for the original block for my Bee. The last 4 are 7449
|
|
|
Re: 340 Crankshaft question
[Re: 440mopar]
#2574864
11/06/18 03:03 PM
11/06/18 03:03 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,305 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,305
Bend,OR USA
|
Were crankshafts in 340 engines typically drilled for pilot bushings even if they came with an automatic? Not always, maybe half or less is what I have seen on the west coast cars ![shruggy shruggy](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/shruggy.gif)
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: 340 Crankshaft question
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2574889
11/06/18 03:44 PM
11/06/18 03:44 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
Were crankshafts in 340 engines typically drilled for pilot bushings even if they came with an automatic? Not always, maybe half or less is what I have seen on the west coast cars About three quarters of the auto cranks I've come across aren't drilled. The hole is roughed in but it's not finished. I've finished several of them. If you have a lathe it's fairly easy.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: 340 Crankshaft question
[Re: 440mopar]
#2574981
11/06/18 06:40 PM
11/06/18 06:40 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 350 Mequon, WI
gzig5
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 350
Mequon, WI
|
The word I heard was that the forged cranks up to '71 were usually finished whether auto or manual and cast cranks after that were only done for manuals. But I'm sure there are exceptions. Doesn't matter if you use the modern alternative from the Magnum that is backward compatible to the LA. If using the new bearing, I'd make sure to remove the bronze one if it is present. http://www.brewersperformance.com/proddetail.php?prod=PB5300
|
|
|
Re: 340 Crankshaft question
[Re: 440mopar]
#2575050
11/06/18 09:48 PM
11/06/18 09:48 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 608 TN
1DGEMAN
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 608
TN
|
ROCKAUTO has that bearing for a lot less. It is ll I have used for years. Just make sure pilot hole is deep enough for trans input shaft. Don't cut off the input shaft drill the hole deeper.
Real Men shift for themselves
|
|
|
Re: 340 Crankshaft question
[Re: 1DGEMAN]
#2575054
11/06/18 09:51 PM
11/06/18 09:51 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
ROCKAUTO has that bearing for a lot less. It is ll I have used for years. Just make sure pilot hole is deep enough for trans input shaft. Don't cut off the input shaft drill the hole deeper. I had a customer that used one of those. It kept breaking the bearing retainer. After verifying the bell was indicated in, we found the bore in the crank was off. I just made a bushing that went in the converter register and that fixed that. It's the only time I've seen that happen.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: 340 Crankshaft question
[Re: 440mopar]
#2575063
11/06/18 10:03 PM
11/06/18 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,212 Park Forest, IL
slantzilla
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,212
Park Forest, IL
|
Dakota truck roller bearing fits in the crank register too.
"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
|
|
|
|
|
|