|
Re: Shedding weight on a newer computerized car
[Re: fal3]
#2568032
10/22/18 09:50 PM
10/22/18 09:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,840 The Swamp
Sixpak
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,840
The Swamp
|
Thinking in a year or two to purchase a used Challenger and this led me to the fact that these cars are heavy. 4500 lbs is a number mentioned the most for the vehicle weight. So, I got to thinking, can you lighten these cars up? With the computer (computers) that run these vehicles, is it really possible to shed some weight from them? Interested in hearing some opinions on this topic. Any weight numbers on the Scat Pak 1320 ?
|
|
|
Re: Shedding weight on a newer computerized car
[Re: fal3]
#2568038
10/22/18 10:05 PM
10/22/18 10:05 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,467 Martinsville, IN
cdwmotorsports
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,467
Martinsville, IN
|
The 1320 seems as good a place to start as any at this point., if ya add a cage I see no need to have all the mandated crash crap.
eBay-cdwmotorsports
|
|
|
Re: Shedding weight on a newer computerized car
[Re: cdwmotorsports]
#2569010
10/24/18 05:50 PM
10/24/18 05:50 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,848 South Bend
John Brown
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,848
South Bend
|
I've watched Project Binky from day one. Never cared to go Rally Racing, or own one of those toy cars, but the fab stuff on there is extreme.
July 19th should be "Drive Like Rockford Day". R.I.P. Jimmie.
|
|
|
|
|
|